On Jan 11, 2012, at 12:19 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Apache seems to have many successful projects using a projectname-user
> mailing list and has conventions for lazy consensus. It would be my
> preference to try their mechanism and see if we get complaints that
> something isn't working for folks
On 1/10/12 8:40 PM, "Michel Boudreau" wrote:
> IRC is a place to go to either discuss the technology, ask
> a consensus among several flex experts or ask questions pertinant to Flex
> that isn't easily accessible through search. It's a place of discussion,
> not only of Q&A. In no way should
Hey Erik,
i like the icon a lot! I didn't listen to all of your presentation, but it
seems to fit the keywords pretty good and is a unique visual!
The lettering saying "Apache Flex" would probably look a bit more united
with just one font at the same font size.
Defenitely a +1!
- Samuel
2012/1/
If the "official" tag on the title is the problem, I don't have any issue
changing it. However, I personally despise mailing list. I can barely
stand this one for the sheer amount of emails, but I'll survive.
IRC is a place to go to either discuss the technology, ask
a consensus among several fl
Yeah, I vote for the IRC chan and stackoverflow. I'm active in both and
there's a lot of great resources and people there.
M
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 7:25 PM, Jeffry Houser wrote:
>
> Same place they always have. StackOverflow, the Adobe Flex Forums, and
> Flex Coders.
> If Adobe is going to
Hey Tink,
This was something that was discussed a few times at Adobe. The
performance penalty of taking 2 display objects is high, so we thought
about making either the SkinnableComponent or the Skin not a DisplayObject.
In the end, we didn't have enough time to go about to fully investigate
it;
On Jan 10, 2012, at 7:35 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> No apology needed. You did the right thing. You "did something". People
> expressed concern so you undid it. It's best to work that way. If we discuss
> and vote on every little thing before doing it we'd never get anything done.
> So we err on
On Jan 7, 2012, at 11:54 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/7/12 2:02 AM, "Anne Kathrine Petterøe" wrote:
>
>> From the top of my head:
>> Would you be able to get enough initial committers for a proposal?
> That's one thing I'm worried about.
>
>> there someone championing the project at A
No apology needed. You did the right thing. You "did something". People
expressed concern so you undid it. It's best to work that way. If we discuss
and vote on every little thing before doing it we'd never get anything done. So
we err on the side of doing then undo when necessary.
Except of c
+1
Keep Walking,
~ Sandeep
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:43 PM, Matt LeGrand wrote:
> More fun logo ideas:
> http://img.skitch.com/20120109-e58tu9kd6ixk7cgdhibya2kypi.png
>
> Vector zip file:
> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/382105/apacheFlexLogo.ai.zip
>
> -Matt
>
> --
> Matt LeGrand
> 3843 NW 27th Ave
Hi,
It's about 2 o'clock in the morning here in Portugal and I just went
through the last of today's (yesterday's?) posts on the mailing list and I
must confess that having gone through them all in a short period of time it
does look like we're trying really hard to find ways this project coul
On Jan 10, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Nicholas Kwiatkowski wrote:
> I'm not quite sure how you would 'merge' the projects. They are completely
> different code bases and have a lot features that differ...
Also, LGPL licensed software must not be included in Apache release. [1]
HTH,
Dave
[1] http://www
On 1/10/2012 6:58 PM, Rick Winscot wrote:
As an example, what will happen if Adobe keeps cranking out Flash Builder
versions? Do committers get a free copy - or will they be expected to pay for
it themselves?
Why would committers get a free copy? It would certainly be a nice
gesture from Ado
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 6:31 PM, Dave Fisher wrote:
> And since Spoon is a 3rd Party and not Apache Flex. There are rules for
> using Apache branding at such a conference.
Dave,
Thanks for the link. We'd talked to Bertrand prior to a lot of this coming
out and he said it was feasible as long a
On Jan 10, 2012, at 4:12 PM, Jonathan Campos wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Rick Winscot wrote:
>
>> Johnathan Campos - Apache Flex wants to have a conference in San Francisco
>> on the first anniversary of the project. Since you're on the commiters
>> list... you'll be donating your
Same place they always have. StackOverflow, the Adobe Flex Forums,
and Flex Coders.
If Adobe is going to discontinue / kill the Adobe Flex Forums; I would
direct people to Flex-coders for a mailing list.
On 1/10/2012 6:43 PM, Brent Arnold wrote:
With this discussion of IRC channels and th
On 1/10/12 3:58 PM, "Rick Winscot" wrote:
> As an example, what will happen if Adobe keeps cranking out Flash Builder
> versions? Do committers get a free copy - or will they be expected to pay for
> it themselves? At the summit, there was no question that Adobe was going to
> keep releasing t
On Jan 10, 2012, at 4:05 PM, Peter Elst wrote:
>> As an example, what will happen if Adobe keeps cranking out Flash Builder
>> versions? Do committers get a free copy - or will they be expected to pay
>> for it themselves?
>>
>
> I don't see how Flash Builder is related to the Apache Flex incub
Quoting Alex Harui :
On 1/10/12 3:36 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
Hearing this from you now it would explain why in the beginning the
Spark set was small, lightweight and manageable and then all the
sudden the classes got huge and out of control.
I would say it wasn't because of an agend
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:58 PM, Rick Winscot wrote:
> Johnathan Campos - Apache Flex wants to have a conference in San Francisco
> on the first anniversary of the project. Since you're on the commiters
> list... you'll be donating your time - pro-bono. Oh... and btw - the
> conference can't make
On 1/10/12 3:36 PM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
> Hearing this from you now it would explain why in the beginning the
> Spark set was small, lightweight and manageable and then all the
> sudden the classes got huge and out of control.
I would say it wasn't because of an agenda per-se. IMHO, the
> As an example, what will happen if Adobe keeps cranking out Flash Builder
> versions? Do committers get a free copy - or will they be expected to pay
> for it themselves?
>
I don't see how Flash Builder is related to the Apache Flex incubator, why
would we expect to get copies? Flash Builder is
Quoting Greg Reddin :
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
What kinds of things get discussed on Struts IRC? Is there an archive that
is searchable?
I'm not sure. I've not spent much time there. It might not even be
used anymore.
I'm worried about confusing folks about wh
At some point... sooner or later - we'll have to embrace the notion that
resources cost money and that the success of a project may be dependent upon
resources other than coding.
As an example, what will happen if Adobe keeps cranking out Flash Builder
versions? Do committers get a free copy -
On 1/10/12 3:47 PM, "peter.e...@gmail.com" wrote:
> When there are Apache Flex releases, I hope we'll have the flex-users
> mailinglist in place. For other questions personally don't think Apache is
> the place for that.
And I have mentioned on the main Adobe forum that folks using Adobe Flex
s
On 1/10/12 3:26 PM, "David Arno" wrote:
> I assume you mean here that the mxmlc compiler uses code also found in the
> asc compiler?
Yes. Actually, these days, it shortcuts that a bit, but that was
essentially the original architecture.
> I didn't think asc existed as a separate executable t
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Brent Arnold wrote:
> Do we want the flex-dev mailing list cluttered with this kind of traffic?
No, I don't think so. But it hasn't happened yet, so I suggest we
don't do anything about it yet.
> I would prefer a forum, rather than a mailing list. And I think an
For example, what is Adobe going to do with their Flex forums, and how
will they address peoples questions that come up in the future that
clearly relate to Apache Flex (not their Adobe Flex components)? I can't
imagine a newbie dev connecting to this list and expecting to find
answers to their
> With this discussion of IRC channels and the like, my question is where do
> we want people asking basic questions on Flex development?
>
When there are Apache Flex releases, I hope we'll have the flex-users
mailinglist in place. For other questions personally don't think Apache is
the place for
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> What kinds of things get discussed on Struts IRC? Is there an archive that
> is searchable?
I'm not sure. I've not spent much time there. It might not even be used anymore.
> I'm worried about confusing folks about what gets discussed
> where
With this discussion of IRC channels and the like, my question is where
do we want people asking basic questions on Flex development?
I'm not talking about the discussions we've had so far, where devs are
asking about component architecture, suggesting changes to the
framework, etc. I'm talkin
>The basic idea is that our design goals have changed significantly since
>Flex 3, and we should design a framework for those new goals and sacrifice
>some backward compatibility. Trying to carry all of our legacy forward is
>probably not going to make it successful.
I totally agree ; I'm a 5-yea
On 1/10/12 3:16 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
Alex, IMO, there was a huge necesity for the new spark component set due to
multiple problems in MX. God methods with lots of mixed code and without
ante separation of concerns that produces lots of lines of code, very
poorly design that makes very
My logo designs:
http://tjoadesign.nl/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/logo.png
http://tjoadesign.nl/afx/logo.ai
Thanks!
Eugene
On 1/10/12 3:16 PM, "Carlos Rovira" wrote:
> Alex, IMO, there was a huge necesity for the new spark component set due to
> multiple problems in MX. God methods with lots of mixed code and without
> ante separation of concerns that produces lots of lines of code, very
> poorly design that makes
> From: Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
> Sent: 10 January 2012 18:04
> MXMLC and COMPC currently leverage ASC. I believe that Flash Authoring
> leverages the same ASC. Flash Authoring has no use for MXMLC
> (at least, the MXML compilation).
I assume you mean here that the mxmlc compiler
I would not give too much credit to Microsoft pulling the plug on
Silverlight... Around February 20010 they joined forces with Apple in
order to kill Flash, at that point they said plugin is dead, Flash is
dead and viva HTML.Then came a new version of Silverlight, at which
point they went public an
+1*10 (so +1 he he )
El martes 10 de enero de 2012, Matthew Poole
escribió:
> +1 this is an opportunity to release legacy code for the greater good.
>
> On 10 January 2012 22:29, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On 1/10/12 2:18 PM, "Jonathan Campos" wrote:
>>
>> > I guess more of a simple ex
On 1/10/12 1:14 AM, "João Fernandes"
wrote:
> BTW Alex, is Adobe having someone to keep contributing to BlazeDS once
> it's an Apache (sub-)Project?
>
> João Fernandes
One could argue that BlazeDS never had any dedicated staff. It is
effectively the underpinnings of DataServices and that
Alex, IMO, there was a huge necesity for the new spark component set due to
multiple problems in MX. God methods with lots of mixed code and without
ante separation of concerns that produces lots of lines of code, very
poorly design that makes very difficult or impossible to extend the code,
etc...
I'm sorry about this, I reverted the changes and the site should be
back to where I added entries earlier today.
Mike
On 1/10/12 2:56 PM, "Greg Reddin" wrote:
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
I'm not liking it, and have no plans to use it. I would think we would set
u
On 1/10/12 2:56 PM, "Greg Reddin" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>> I'm not liking it, and have no plans to use it. I would think we would set
>> up a flex-user mailing list instead.
>
> Perhaps the word "official" is problematic. It's not really official
> becau
Jeffry,
I participated in the mono-touch and mono-droid betas... Moonlight - will run
Silverlight content on Android and at one point Microsoft had announced iOS
support. What the status of those projects are now with Microsoft pulling the
plug on Silverlight... who knows.
--
Rick Winscot
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Greg Reddin wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> > I'm not liking it, and have no plans to use it. I would think we would
> set
> > up a flex-user mailing list instead.
>
I would prefer a user mailinglist over promoting this IRC channe
Quoting Greg Reddin :
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
I'm not liking it, and have no plans to use it. I would think we would set
up a flex-user mailing list instead.
Perhaps the word "official" is problematic. It's not really official
because it's not supported by Apache.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm not liking it, and have no plans to use it. I would think we would set
> up a flex-user mailing list instead.
Perhaps the word "official" is problematic. It's not really official
because it's not supported by Apache. Certainly any "officia
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I'm not liking it, and have no plans to use it. I would think we would set
> up a flex-user mailing list instead.
>
Agreed. My biggest issue is the "official" name to it. That more than
implies "officialness". Especially an issue for voting.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:48 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Shame on me, I thought I read that saying it was a community resource was
> ok.
>
> That's definitely my fault, should I revert it?
IMO, no. If discussion ensues and there doesn't seem to be consensus,
revert it. Otherwise we work by lazy
I'm not liking it, and have no plans to use it. I would think we would set
up a flex-user mailing list instead.
On 1/10/12 2:45 PM, "Tink" wrote:
> I'm not saying this shouldn't be done, but shouldn't this go through
> some kind of vote process/discussion?
>
> The channel now says its the "Of
> Shame on me, I thought I read that saying it was a community resource was
> ok.
>
I also thought there was discussion on this after Bertrand voiced some
concerns. That said for other things there was a vote to get it published.
- Peter
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:45 PM, Tink wrote:
> I'm not saying this shouldn't be done, but shouldn't this go through some
> kind of vote process/discussion?
Discussion is good if we need it. I don't think a vote is necessary in
this case unless there appears to be differences of opinion among the
rrr i dunno ;)
On 10 Jan 2012, at 22:48, Michael Schmalle wrote:
Shame on me, I thought I read that saying it was a community
resource was ok.
That's definitely my fault, should I revert it?
Miek
Quoting Tink :
I'm not saying this shouldn't be done, but shouldn't this go
through s
> -Original Message-
> From: Michael Schmalle [mailto:m...@teotigraphix.com]
>
> Shame on me, I thought I read that saying it was a community resource was
> ok.
>
> That's definitely my fault, should I revert it?
Maybe, at least until we get a consensus on what is allowed. I'm one for no
Shame on me, I thought I read that saying it was a community resource was ok.
That's definitely my fault, should I revert it?
Miek
Quoting Tink :
I'm not saying this shouldn't be done, but shouldn't this go through
some kind of vote process/discussion?
The channel now says its the "Offici
Done.
Mike
Quoting Michael Schmalle :
I will check this out.
Mike
Quoting Michel Boudreau :
Can one of the committers please add this patch that I created? Feel free
to modify text if need be. Warning, I did not actually test this using
that metalanguage.
Cheers,
M
Index: content/flex
I'm not saying this shouldn't be done, but shouldn't this go through
some kind of vote process/discussion?
The channel now says its the "Official Apache Flex Channel" but no-one
has really commented on that yet have they, except Bertrand with
concerns. Does Apache Flex require IRC?
That s
On 1/10/12 10:17 AM, "Matthew Poole" wrote:
> Presumably the community could know ahead of time when language features
> where proposed.
I wouldn't count on lots of advanced notice of new language features. The
player will likely continue being backward compatible so existing technology
shoul
+1 this is an opportunity to release legacy code for the greater good.
On 10 January 2012 22:29, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/10/12 2:18 PM, "Jonathan Campos" wrote:
>
> > I guess more of a simple execution. But that is besides the point. I'm
> more
> > interested in your thoughts to a newer
I will check this out.
Mike
Quoting Michel Boudreau :
Can one of the committers please add this patch that I created? Feel free
to modify text if need be. Warning, I did not actually test this using
that metalanguage.
Cheers,
M
Index: content/flex/irc.mdtext
==
On 1/10/12 2:18 PM, "Jonathan Campos" wrote:
> I guess more of a simple execution. But that is besides the point. I'm more
> interested in your thoughts to a newer component model. I would want to get
> a few people going in the same direction on that.
I think I am going to put off that discus
Can one of the committers please add this patch that I created? Feel free
to modify text if need be. Warning, I did not actually test this using
that metalanguage.
Cheers,
M
Index: content/flex/irc.mdtext
===
--- content/flex/irc.
Quoting Jonathan Campos :
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
Are you looking for proof or more definition on what I'm
talking about?
I guess more of a simple execution. But that is besides the point. I'm more
interested in your thoughts to a newer component model. I would w
Yeah, I think this warrants a new post.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Tink wrote:
> On 10 Jan 2012, at 18:28, Stephane Beladaci wrote:
>
> What about Spark skinning and performance? Does Spark skinning affects
>> or not the performance of an application? I personally really like
>> Spark and
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Are you looking for proof or more definition on what I'm
> talking about?
>
I guess more of a simple execution. But that is besides the point. I'm more
interested in your thoughts to a newer component model. I would want to get
a few people go
I'm not sure there is a Product team. It is now just a bunch of developers
contributing to Apache. So I would say that Adobe is not going to offer a
prize.
On 1/10/12 1:48 PM, "dusty.jew...@gmail.com" wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
>
>> I'm not going to ask e
+1 this is a volunteer community.
On 10 January 2012 21:57, Peter Elst wrote:
> > I asked Aaron Houston if the AUG team would like to sponsor this... he
> felt
> > that this was more in-line with the Product team, so we should ask them.
> >
>
> Not to stir things up but I have the impression the
On 1/10/12 2:03 PM, "Jonathan Campos" wrote:
> I don't supposed you have a test case for this?
Not really. We sort of did that for mx:Button, but that's sort of the
degenerate case. Are you looking for proof or more definition on what I'm
talking about?
--
Alex Harui
Flex SDK Team
Adobe Sy
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> We could have retro-fitted every MX
> component to instantiate a skin class just like Spark and not built up a
> whole new component set,
>
I don't supposed you have a test case for this?
--
Jonathan Campos
On 1/10/12 11:32 AM, "Jonathan Campos" wrote:
>
> I'm interested to see what ideas you have about a new skinning model. I
> like the way spark skinning works so I wouldn't want to lose that. But
> interested in what else there is.
I'm not sure there is "something else". The Spark skinning mo
> I asked Aaron Houston if the AUG team would like to sponsor this... he felt
> that this was more in-line with the Product team, so we should ask them.
>
Not to stir things up but I have the impression there was more or less a
consensus and feedback by two of our mentors that the Apache way would
Quoting Alex Harui :
I'm pretty sure God was able to create the world in six days because he
didn't have to go through legal.
We are now shooting for end of this week.
Sorry for the delay,
-Alex
I can only imagine how your head feels and that silence must be golden
to you when you get it.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Sorry for the delay,
No worries. Just trying to keep up with it :)
As the person that did/is doing much of the legal for Spoon I completely
understand that things just take time.
--
Jonathan Campos
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Carol Frampton wrote:
> I'm not going to ask either. I don't think there should be a prize.
I asked Aaron Houston if the AUG team would like to sponsor this... he felt
that this was more in-line with the Product team, so we should ask them.
I'm pretty sure God was able to create the world in six days because he
didn't have to go through legal.
We are now shooting for end of this week.
Sorry for the delay,
-Alex
On 1/10/12 1:30 PM, "Jonathan Campos" wrote:
> Any update from the Adobe side on getting the source in this week?
>
>
Any update from the Adobe side on getting the source in this week?
Discussing the logo and whiteboard is cool and all, just curious when the
source will be pushed.
--
Jonathan Campos
On 1/10/12 2 :32PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>
>
>
>On 1/10/12 10:06 AM, "Michel Boudreau" wrote:
>
>> Wouldn't it be possible to get Adobe to donate some swag? You know,
>> creative suite and the likes? There must be other companies that are
>>able
>> to donate something if we actually look for
> On 1/10/12 10:25 AM, "Jonathan Campos" wrote:
>
>> But if someone wants to go create an AIR based FXG/MXML skin editor, more
>> power to them.
>
> Or build their own Eclipse plug-in. Adobe will not bring back FC. If
> enough folks in the community want something like it, they are free to st
On 1/10/2012 2:48 PM, Doug McCune wrote:
When was the last time you saw a company move away
from Flex to Silverlight or JavaFX? Or make a decision to start a new
project using Silverlight or JavaFX instead of Flex?
In early 2011 a client chose Silverlight for one of their projects. I
was n
On 10 Jan 2012, at 18:28, Stephane Beladaci wrote:
What about Spark skinning and performance? Does Spark skinning affects
or not the performance of an application? I personally really like
Spark and tend to prefer skins over lose CSS styling, however I heard
from some colleague that Spark skinni
The most interesting thing that happened to Java (or more specifically
to the JVM) in the last few yeras is how the community came up with
solutions on how to improve the platform from the "outside" by not
waiting for Sun or Oracle to deliver something. Examples are Groovy
and more recently Scala.
Velocity, adoption and PR will definitely brings HTML closer however I
personally believe that the very nature of W3C standard will always
make the HTML5 stack slower to evolve and innovate. Look at Apple
currently crippling HTML5 audio and video on iOS Safari to protect its
native ecosystem and av
>
> Flex has no competition in the RIA space I do not consider HTML
> remotely close to a RIA technology,
All the clients that are specifically deciding to pursue HTML apps instead
of Flex apps would beg to differ (and ask any Flex consulting shop and
they'll tell you there are *many* clients lik
Hot Potato! Who wants to take charge on this initiative?
M
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/10/12 10:06 AM, "Michel Boudreau" wrote:
>
> > Wouldn't it be possible to get Adobe to donate some swag? You know,
> > creative suite and the likes? There must be other
Flex has no competition in the RIA space I do not consider HTML
remotely close to a RIA technology, it's a W3C standard and as such it
will never be capable to evolve and innovate as rapidly as other
technologies that are not controlled and crippled by competing
interest of the giants who all sit a
The only competition in the web space is HTML/Javascript, which
has practically no tooling whatsoever at this point in time (obviously
that's being worked on as we speak). The competition in the mobile space is
more varied, with native iOS and Android, as well as HTML/JS packaged up
(ie via PhoneGa
really depends on the client I think. We got some inquiries recently, the
biggest was some 100+ days of pure Flex work - and they *did* know the full
story, but they also know there's no alternative for them.
Other clients did not knew the story, we told them because we think it's
fair to tell it
That sentiment is growing more and more... legal-folks are starting to see
software development as 'creative juices' expressed digitally and not just IP.
However, there are three decades worth of precent that needs massaging to bring
coding on-par with a field like graphic design.
Code can be c
I am seeing the risk that Flex won't be as competitive
with comparable RIA technologies and tools already
out there (see diagram):
http://code.google.com/p/masuland/wiki/WhatsWrongWithFlex#1.1._Comparing_Flex_with_the_Fellows
Therefore, I am seeing the need that there must be
some kind of Flas
The community can decide that Spark is not where they want to put their
energy and decide to put it somewhere else. I plan to use my whiteboard
space for that something else.
I like your direction Alex. I plan to check out what you have going
the minute you commit it.
Mike
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> IMHO, we could have retro-fitted a new skinning model onto the MX
> components in less time.
>
I'm interested to see what ideas you have about a new skinning model. I
like the way spark skinning works so I wouldn't want to lose that. But
inte
On 1/10/12 10:06 AM, "Michel Boudreau" wrote:
> Wouldn't it be possible to get Adobe to donate some swag? You know,
> creative suite and the likes? There must be other companies that are able
> to donate something if we actually look for it, like JetBrains for IntelliJ
> or FDS, or some of t
my favourite is the x icon with the black bg. great work.
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 8:05 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:
> Quoting Doug McCune :
>
> Here's my final logo submission:
>>
>> Preview: http://dougmccune.com/flexlogo/apache_flex_logo_dmccune.jpg
>> Full source assets:
>> http://dougmccune.
On 1/10/12 10:13 AM, "Doug McCune" wrote:
> Yeah, you and Michael make the point that Spark is a good improvement
> regardless of Fc, and I wasn't really trying to argue that it wasn't. I was
> more lamenting the fact that a large amount of brainpower and man-hours
> went into getting things c
On 1/10/12 10:25 AM, "Jonathan Campos" wrote:
> But if someone wants to go create an AIR based FXG/MXML skin editor, more
> power to them.
Or build their own Eclipse plug-in. Adobe will not bring back FC. If
enough folks in the community want something like it, they are free to start
buildi
Quoting Doug McCune :
Here's my final logo submission:
Preview: http://dougmccune.com/flexlogo/apache_flex_logo_dmccune.jpg
Full source assets:
http://dougmccune.com/flexlogo/apache_flex_logo_dmccune.ai
BTW, added my name into the subject just to keep discussions about logos
easier to separat
Just one word... seksi.
-omar
Here's my final logo submission:
Preview: http://dougmccune.com/flexlogo/apache_flex_logo_dmccune.jpg
Full source assets:
http://dougmccune.com/flexlogo/apache_flex_logo_dmccune.ai
BTW, added my name into the subject just to keep discussions about logos
easier to separate (rather than everything
> -Original Message-
> From: Michel Boudreau [mailto:michelboudr...@gmail.com]
>
> Wouldn't it be possible to get Adobe to donate some swag? You know,
> creative suite and the likes? There must be other companies that are able to
> donate something if we actually look for it, like JetBra
On Jan 10, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Rogelio Castillo A. wrote:
> Hey, no problem, I know it gets difficult to follow the list with the current
> activity. I just wanted to express my concern about it, I know when JIRA is
> up, contributing will be much easier and organised.
Your patch is certainly a
Hey, no problem, I know it gets difficult to follow the list with the current
activity. I just wanted to express my concern about it, I know when JIRA is up,
contributing will be much easier and organised.
Cheers
R
On 10/01/2012, at 3:37 PM, Douglas Arthur wrote:
>> -Original Message-
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
