On 1/10/12 2:18 PM, "Jonathan Campos" <jonbcam...@gmail.com> wrote: > I guess more of a simple execution. But that is besides the point. I'm more > interested in your thoughts to a newer component model. I would want to get > a few people going in the same direction on that. I think I am going to put off that discussion for a while. I'm fully booked trying to get Flex source into Apache, and them I'm out of the country for a couple of weeks in early Feb. The basic idea is that our design goals have changed significantly since Flex 3, and we should design a framework for those new goals and sacrifice some backward compatibility. Trying to carry all of our legacy forward is probably not going to make it successful. -- Alex Harui Flex SDK Team Adobe Systems, Inc. http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Stephane Beladaci
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Tink
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Scott Delamater
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Alex Harui
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Jonathan Campos
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Alex Harui
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Jonathan Campos
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Alex Harui
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Jonathan Campos
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Michael Schmalle
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Alex Harui
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Matthew Poole
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Carlos Rovira
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Carlos Rovira
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Alex Harui
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Michael Schmalle
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Quentin Le Hénaff
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Alex Harui
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Michael Schmalle
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Michael Schmalle
- Re: Petition: Flash Catalyst must survive Stephane Beladaci