On 01/10/14 12:31 AM, James Almer wrote:
> On 01/10/14 12:18 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:57:14PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>>> On 30/09/14 11:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:59:39PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 15.09.201
On 01.10.2014 04:34, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:59:39PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 15.09.2014 22:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014
On 01/10/14 12:18 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:57:14PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> On 30/09/14 11:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:59:39PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
On 15.09.2014 22:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mo
On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:57:14PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 30/09/14 11:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:59:39PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> >> On 15.09.2014 22:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wro
On 30/09/14 11:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:59:39PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
>> On 15.09.2014 22:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:59:39PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote:
> On 15.09.2014 22:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> >>On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> >>>On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:46:03PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 15.09.2014 22:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:46:03PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
Signed-off-by: James Almer
about the patchset as a whole, not specificall
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:19:58PM -0700, Timothy Gu wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> >> I'm not exactly interested in looking around to see if any of this
> >> deprecated
> >> stuff is still us
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> I'm not exactly interested in looking around to see if any of this deprecated
>> stuff is still used. And IMO reintroducing them in a point release is quite
>> ugly.
>> An
On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:46:03PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: James Almer
> >
> > about the patchset as a whole, not specifically this one
> >
> > we should check
On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:46:03PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: James Almer
>
> about the patchset as a whole, not specifically this one
>
> we should check if theres any software left around that still uses
> the symbols before re
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:46:03PM -0300, James Almer wrote:
> Signed-off-by: James Almer
about the patchset as a whole, not specifically this one
we should check if theres any software left around that still uses
the symbols before removing the code completely and if so consider
to reintroduce
12 matches
Mail list logo