On 01/10/14 12:31 AM, James Almer wrote: > On 01/10/14 12:18 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:57:14PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >>> On 30/09/14 11:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:59:39PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >>>>> On 15.09.2014 22:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >>>>>>> On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:46:03PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> about the patchset as a whole, not specifically this one >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> we should check if theres any software left around that still uses >>>>>>>> the symbols before removing the code completely and if so consider >>>>>>>> to reintroduce them in a 2.4.1 while removing whats unused >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Pushed the three you reviewed since either no code depended on them, or >>>>>>> in the >>>>>>> OpenCL case it's an API that nobody has ever been able to use anyway. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I'm not exactly interested in looking around to see if any of this >>>>>>> deprecated >>>>>>> stuff is still used. And IMO reintroducing them in a point release is >>>>>>> quite ugly. >>>>>>> An exception could be FF_API_DRAWTEXT_OLD_TIMELINE since as Clément >>>>>>> pointed in >>>>>>> another email might be needed to remain compatible with libav. >>>>>> >>>>>> probably you only have to wait, as i suspect andreas (in CC) will >>>>>> test building all dependant packages in debian against 2.4 >>>>> >>>>> You're right that I'm currently rebuilding those against 2.4, but I >>>>> don't expect any problems there, since I already have rebuilt them >>>>> against a git snapshot about two weeks ago and didn't notice >>>>> anything problematic. >>>> >>>> any news ? can these be applied ? >>> >>> Debian packages are all meant to work with libav 9 or 11 api, and all this >>> deprecated >>> code removed in 2.4 was ffmpeg exclusive, so it's unlikely they used any of >>> it. >>> Also, 2.4 has been out for two weeks and nobody complained about their >>> applications >>> breaking because these are no longer available. >>> >>> We could wait a bit more in any case. The entire patchset is just dead code >>> removal. >> >> ok, just dont forget about them, i wont keep track of them anymore >> too much stuff to keep track off .... > > I'll apply them this weekend, then.
Patchset applied, except for "[PATCH 17/18] avfilter: remove obsolete FF_API_DRAWTEXT_OLD_TIMELINE cruft" as we may need to reintroduce that functionality to remain compatible with libav. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
