On 01/10/14 12:18 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:57:14PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >> On 30/09/14 11:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:59:39PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: >>>> On 15.09.2014 22:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>>>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >>>>>> On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: >>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:46:03PM -0300, James Almer wrote: >>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> about the patchset as a whole, not specifically this one >>>>>>> >>>>>>> we should check if theres any software left around that still uses >>>>>>> the symbols before removing the code completely and if so consider >>>>>>> to reintroduce them in a 2.4.1 while removing whats unused >>>>>> >>>>>> Pushed the three you reviewed since either no code depended on them, or >>>>>> in the >>>>>> OpenCL case it's an API that nobody has ever been able to use anyway. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm not exactly interested in looking around to see if any of this >>>>>> deprecated >>>>>> stuff is still used. And IMO reintroducing them in a point release is >>>>>> quite ugly. >>>>>> An exception could be FF_API_DRAWTEXT_OLD_TIMELINE since as Clément >>>>>> pointed in >>>>>> another email might be needed to remain compatible with libav. >>>>> >>>>> probably you only have to wait, as i suspect andreas (in CC) will >>>>> test building all dependant packages in debian against 2.4 >>>> >>>> You're right that I'm currently rebuilding those against 2.4, but I >>>> don't expect any problems there, since I already have rebuilt them >>>> against a git snapshot about two weeks ago and didn't notice >>>> anything problematic. >>> >>> any news ? can these be applied ? >> >> Debian packages are all meant to work with libav 9 or 11 api, and all this >> deprecated >> code removed in 2.4 was ffmpeg exclusive, so it's unlikely they used any of >> it. >> Also, 2.4 has been out for two weeks and nobody complained about their >> applications >> breaking because these are no longer available. >> >> We could wait a bit more in any case. The entire patchset is just dead code >> removal. > > ok, just dont forget about them, i wont keep track of them anymore > too much stuff to keep track off ....
I'll apply them this weekend, then. _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
