On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:59:39PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > On 15.09.2014 22:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > >>On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >>>On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:46:03PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > >>>>Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> > >>> > >>>about the patchset as a whole, not specifically this one > >>> > >>>we should check if theres any software left around that still uses > >>>the symbols before removing the code completely and if so consider > >>>to reintroduce them in a 2.4.1 while removing whats unused > >> > >>Pushed the three you reviewed since either no code depended on them, or in > >>the > >>OpenCL case it's an API that nobody has ever been able to use anyway. > >> > >>I'm not exactly interested in looking around to see if any of this > >>deprecated > >>stuff is still used. And IMO reintroducing them in a point release is quite > >>ugly. > >>An exception could be FF_API_DRAWTEXT_OLD_TIMELINE since as Clément pointed > >>in > >>another email might be needed to remain compatible with libav. > > > >probably you only have to wait, as i suspect andreas (in CC) will > >test building all dependant packages in debian against 2.4 > > You're right that I'm currently rebuilding those against 2.4, but I > don't expect any problems there, since I already have rebuilt them > against a git snapshot about two weeks ago and didn't notice > anything problematic.
any news ? can these be applied ? [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB DNS cache poisoning attacks, popular search engine, Google internet authority dont be evil, please
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
