On Tue, Sep 30, 2014 at 11:57:14PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > On 30/09/14 11:34 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 10:59:39PM +0200, Andreas Cadhalpun wrote: > >> On 15.09.2014 22:03, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >>> On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > >>>> On 15/09/14 6:07 AM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >>>>> On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 10:46:03PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > >>>>>> Signed-off-by: James Almer <jamr...@gmail.com> > >>>>> > >>>>> about the patchset as a whole, not specifically this one > >>>>> > >>>>> we should check if theres any software left around that still uses > >>>>> the symbols before removing the code completely and if so consider > >>>>> to reintroduce them in a 2.4.1 while removing whats unused > >>>> > >>>> Pushed the three you reviewed since either no code depended on them, or > >>>> in the > >>>> OpenCL case it's an API that nobody has ever been able to use anyway. > >>>> > >>>> I'm not exactly interested in looking around to see if any of this > >>>> deprecated > >>>> stuff is still used. And IMO reintroducing them in a point release is > >>>> quite ugly. > >>>> An exception could be FF_API_DRAWTEXT_OLD_TIMELINE since as Clément > >>>> pointed in > >>>> another email might be needed to remain compatible with libav. > >>> > >>> probably you only have to wait, as i suspect andreas (in CC) will > >>> test building all dependant packages in debian against 2.4 > >> > >> You're right that I'm currently rebuilding those against 2.4, but I > >> don't expect any problems there, since I already have rebuilt them > >> against a git snapshot about two weeks ago and didn't notice > >> anything problematic. > > > > any news ? can these be applied ? > > Debian packages are all meant to work with libav 9 or 11 api, and all this > deprecated > code removed in 2.4 was ffmpeg exclusive, so it's unlikely they used any of > it. > Also, 2.4 has been out for two weeks and nobody complained about their > applications > breaking because these are no longer available. > > We could wait a bit more in any case. The entire patchset is just dead code > removal.
ok, just dont forget about them, i wont keep track of them anymore too much stuff to keep track off .... [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB What does censorship reveal? It reveals fear. -- Julian Assange
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
