On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 01:19:58PM -0700, Timothy Gu wrote: > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 1:03 PM, Michael Niedermayer <michae...@gmx.at> wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 04:08:49PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > >> I'm not exactly interested in looking around to see if any of this > >> deprecated > >> stuff is still used. And IMO reintroducing them in a point release is > >> quite ugly. > >> An exception could be FF_API_DRAWTEXT_OLD_TIMELINE since as Clément > >> pointed in > >> another email might be needed to remain compatible with libav. > > > > probably you only have to wait, as i suspect andreas (in CC) will > > test building all dependant packages in debian against 2.4 > > FF_API_DRAWTEXT_OLD_TIMELINE deprecates an option, which means that a > rebuild won't show if the application works with FFmpeg or not.
yes, that maybe should be put back i meant the other API stuff [...] -- Michael GnuPG fingerprint: 9FF2128B147EF6730BADF133611EC787040B0FAB Why not whip the teacher when the pupil misbehaves? -- Diogenes of Sinope
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org http://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel
