Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] Cherry picks vs merges

On Sun, Jun 1, 2025 at 5:32 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > I'm not against merging his changes, and i apologize if what i said > before > > sounded like an accusation, but the way i want this to go forward is with > > him being ok with it, and not us trying to find a way to workaround what > w

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg Community Committee – Updates & Next Steps

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 8:27 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Marth64 > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 05:00:30PM -0600, Marth64 wrote: > > Hi Michael, > > > > Thanks for the reply & thoughts. > > > > To clarify on "internal panel" and "structured issue resolution", this > > is with regards to unres

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] avfilter/graphdump: implement options parsing

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 4:16 PM Nicolas George wrote: > James Almer (HE12025-02-28): > > You're the last person i expected to say something so childish... > > Ad-hominem. > > > Ok, you finally answered my question. And it's disappointing to know you > > consider the currently most active develope

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: Better {} style rule

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 4:09 PM Nicolas George wrote: > Hard rules on cosmetic matters are a terrible idea, whether they are > enforced at the level of the language or downstream from it. agree to disagree :) -- Vittorio ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg Community Committee – Updates & Next Steps

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 8:14 AM compn wrote: > On Thu, 27 Feb 2025 23:41:14 +0100, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > > them and make sure we can keep working together without grudges. Also > there > > are a lot of pending issues from that time (the most grave one IMO, how a &

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: Better {} style rule

On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 1:25 PM Lynne wrote: > > > On 28/02/2025 03:33, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 28, 2025 at 03:25:06AM +0100, Lynne wrote: > >> On 27/02/2025 02:10, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > >>> Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > >>> --- > >>>doc/developer.texi | 11 +

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/developer: Better {} style rule

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 11:47 PM wrote: > On 27 Feb 2025, at 2:10, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > > --- > > doc/developer.texi | 11 +-- > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/developer.tex

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg Community Committee – Updates & Next Steps

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 7:18 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi jb > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 12:11:39AM +0100, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Feb 2025, at 02:51, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > [...] > > > 2. The CC is overstepping its authority. > > > > Literally, the email just says t

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] I've written a filter in Rust

On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 3:30 PM Soft Works < softworkz-at-hotmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of > > Michael Niedermayer > > Sent: Freitag, 21. Februar 2025 14:22 > > To: FFmpeg development discussions and patches > de...@ffmpeg.org>

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FFmpeg Community Committee – Updates & Next Steps

On Wed, Feb 26, 2025 at 2:51 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Marth64 > > On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 05:04:00PM -0600, Marth64 wrote: > > Dear FFmpeg Community, > > > > We’d like to share an update on the work of the Community Committee > > (CC). Starting this week, we will hold a weekly internal

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2025

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 2:17 AM Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel < ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Feb 2025, 00:20 Michael Niedermayer, > wrote: > > > Hi everyone > > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 06:30:11AM +0800, Steven Liu wrote: > > > Michael Niedermayer 于2025年1月28日 周二10:21写道： > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] GSoC 2025 SDR Cleanup

On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 2:21 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > Ive added SDR to our GSoC 2025 page as there was just a single project > on that page and the page needs to be more complete yesterday > > If people are against this say this NOW do not wait until we have accepted > a student

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] 10bit MV-HEVC decoding support

On Fri, Feb 7, 2025 at 4:31 PM Danny Hong wrote: > Hello, is there any plan to add 10bit support to MV-HEVC decoding? As far as I know, 10 bit bitdepth is not specified in the MV profile for HEVC, therefore, any 10 bit support would be out of standard. -- Vittorio _

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization work in progress draft v2

On Mon, Feb 3, 2025 at 7:08 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi James > > On Sun, Feb 02, 2025 at 03:14:58PM -0300, James Almer wrote: > > On 2/1/2025 6:53 PM, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Hi James > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 01, 2025 at 10:30:21AM -0300, James Almer wrote: > > > > On 1/31/2025 9:

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization work in progress draft v2

On Sun, Feb 2, 2025 at 3:26 AM Leo Izen wrote: > While this isn't an entirely analogous situation, most contributors who > are active have been active since they started contributing, so this > doesn't do a whole lot except to pick out people who used to be active > and then stopped and then star

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FOSDEM meeting

___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization work in progress draft v2

Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2025, at 3:11 PM, Jean-Baptiste Kempf wrote: > > Hello, > >> On Sat, 1 Feb 2025, at 07:45, Zhao Zhili wrote: >> The proposal treat every GA member as suspect, and GA members with >> daily jobs guilty. >> >> The community should be based on trust and everyone s

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization work in progress draft v2

Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2025, at 2:21 PM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi, > >> On Sat, Feb 1, 2025 at 1:45 AM Zhao Zhili < >> quinkblack-at-foxmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: >> >> The proposal treat every GA member as suspect, and GA members with daily >> jobs guilty. > > > Thank you

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] FOSDEM meeting

Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 1, 2025, at 9:28 AM, Devin Heitmueller > wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 25, 2025, 11:09 PM Marth64 wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> Looking forward to it. > > Has a time/location been set for this? Hi Devin, The FFMPEG meeting at FOSDEM will happen at 5pm CET at Chez Theo,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 12:22 AM Soft Works < softworkz-at-hotmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > That does not mean it would be worth trying something different. I > > already > > listed the incidents I've just seen happen before my eyes in this > > mailing > > list and these are not fun incidents. I

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2025

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 10:20 PM Koushik Dutta wrote: > Why gitlab and not GitHub? If the intent is on making contribution from new > developers easier, I think the workflow should be where the majority of > developers are actively participating. > Because Github is hosted on servers in the US,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Fri, Jan 31, 2025 at 1:03 AM Soft Works < softworkz-at-hotmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of > > Vittorio Giovara > > Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2025 10:46 AM > > To: FFmpeg

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:21 PM Niklas Haas wrote: > On Wed, 29 Jan 2025 21:51:27 +0100 Nicolas George wrote: > > Niklas Haas (12025-01-29): > > > I think the most important crux of the problem is a fundamental > disagreement > > > between Michael and the "community" (for lack of a better term)

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 9:02 AM Nicolas George wrote: > Vittorio Giovara (12025-01-30): > > No, what we're seeing is a few representatives of the community > > Nobody appointed them. > > Nobody appointed you. > > I am more representative of the community than

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Thu, Jan 30, 2025 at 12:27 AM Soft Works < softworkz-at-hotmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > If you have reason to believe otherwise, then indeed the situation is > > more > > complicated. And then we may have a third faction consisting of some > > subset of > > (Michael, Timo, Fabrice, and p

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization work in progress draft v2

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 9:33 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > Heres my current "work in progress": (sending that before fosdem, so > people can discuss if they like) > > Goals: > The proposed changes aim to improve the General Assembly's structure > to ensure inclusivity, fairness,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization work in progress draft v2

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:49 PM Soft Works < softworkz-at-hotmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of Leo > > Izen > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 10:39 PM > > To: ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org > > Subject: Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratizat

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] GSoC 2025

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 9:02 PM Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 2:32 PM Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel < > ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > It's clear the contribution method is outdated and difficult to > > manage. We need to move to GitLab ASAP > > > Yes please. >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:45 PM Nicolas George wrote: > Marth64 (12025-01-29): > > Help me understand your version so we can make a table to contrast? > > Once again: learn from history. > > What we are seeing here is a small group of people with some skills in > social engineering bullying Mich

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 10:36 PM Nicolas George wrote: > > Yes, obviously. That is exactly why I think that another fork is a likely > > outcome at this point in time. > > Then the only viable strategy is to make sure the people who fork are > the harmful ones. > So you're leaving? Don't let the

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

Hi SW, would you mind moving to a different thread or at least changing the email subject? This discussion is already hard enough to follow without you throwing a fit. Thank you Vittorio On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 6:23 PM Soft Works < softworkz-at-hotmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > -Original

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 4:24 PM Soft Works < softworkz-at-hotmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > You are skewing the discuscussion and attacking me while constructing > > a > > conspiracy theory that is not true (I don't want to gain any control > > at > > all, I want a community-decided process for m

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 5:12 PM compn wrote: > we can see how badly something ran by GA vote works right now. with our > own eyes. ffmpeg just had a vote for the CC and two developers > immediately quit working in the CC. why did we just waste all that > time with a vote then? > I respect the fa

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 12:52 PM Soft Works < softworkz-at-hotmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of > > Vittorio Giovara > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 11:51 AM > > To: FFmpeg

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Wed, Jan 29, 2025 at 11:32 AM Soft Works < softworkz-at-hotmail@ffmpeg.org> wrote: > > > > -Original Message- > > From: ffmpeg-devel On Behalf Of > > Vittorio Giovara > > Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2025 10:45 AM > > To: FFmpeg

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Tue, Jan 28, 2025 at 7:21 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > About people pointing to me as the cause of something they do. > Given iam in this project for over 20 years and iam the main author and > we had a fork long ago. With many people joining back together. There are > people who have had p

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] avformat/hls: Be more picky on extensions

On Sat, Jan 25, 2025 at 9:38 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 23, 2025 at 10:27:47PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 22, 2025 at 09:36:09PM +0100, Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > This blocks disallowed extensions from probing > > > It also requires all available segm

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 10:24 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Kieran > > On Sun, Jan 26, 2025 at 07:39:38PM +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > > I remember such a IRC session before the libav fork. > > > It is very similar to this here > > > 4+ people, who simply accuse me of e

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] configure: Improve the check for the rsync --contimeout option

> On Jan 24, 2025, at 10:40 PM, Martin Storsjö wrote: > > Traditionally, macOS has shipped an old version of rsync that lacked > support for this version, hence this check (added in > a8b3f0c5cf548f654e30c981988bb71981a3f8d3). > > However, in macOS 15.x, they have switched to providing rsync a

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 8:37 PM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Hello, > > Le tiistaina 21. tammikuuta 2025, 2.36.47 UTC+2 Michael Niedermayer a > écrit : > > Hi > > > > On Mon, Jan 20, 2025 at 10:38:17AM -0600, Marth64 wrote: > > > All this time people send back and forth emails attacking each othe

[FFmpeg-devel] FOSDEM meeting

Greetings FFmpeg community There will be a community meeting during the conference, dates and times TBA! I believe there will be means to connect remotely, and everybody is invited to join, especially those that believe that only 1-2 people are representing the community's desires. Be the change

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/4] doc/faq: Document the plan ahead for Governance

On Mon, Jan 13, 2025 at 10:00 AM Nicolas George wrote: > Michael Niedermayer (12025-01-11): > > But i think a company which actually depends on a FFmpeg vote outcome > > will be able to connect the dots and be able to enumerate the options > > to influcence said vote > > Hi. That is true. Which i

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: CC election

On Tue, Jan 7, 2025 at 1:20 PM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le tiistaina 7. tammikuuta 2025, 6.46.24 UTC+2 Vittorio Giovara a écrit : > > S not to poke a bee's nest, but what's going on here? Are there any > > blockers for the elected people to assume their roles?

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/4] doc/faq: Anwser some questions about he GA, which keep popping up

> On Jan 7, 2025, at 7:02 AM, Michael Niedermayer > wrote: > > Hi Ronald > >> On Mon, Jan 06, 2025 at 09:38:27PM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 6, 2025 at 6:23 PM Michael Niedermayer >> wrote: >> >>> +@subsection Can votes be bought? >>> >> >> Really? This is necessary? :-(

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: CC election

On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 3:12 PM Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 11:29 AM Leo Izen wrote: > >> On 12/28/24 11:53 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: >> > Hi all, >> > >> > (Prior note: the election was scheduled to end on the 23rd of Dec

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Democratization

On Thu, Jan 2, 2025 at 9:17 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi all > > I was working in the last few days a little on drafting a democratization > process > > Heres the current draft: (very preliminary and will certainly change alot) > also I still need to find out, if more than 3 developer actua

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: CC election

On Mon, Dec 30, 2024 at 11:29 AM Leo Izen wrote: > On 12/28/24 11:53 AM, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > (Prior note: the election was scheduled to end on the 23rd of December. > > Anton is currently taking a break so I've asked him to let me announce > the > > election results.) > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] commit access removed

On Wed, Jan 1, 2025 at 6:34 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Timo > > On Wed, Jan 01, 2025 at 11:36:20PM +0100, Timo Rothenpieler wrote: > > On 01.01.2025 23:12, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > > Happy new year everyone! > > > > > > On Fri

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] commit access removed

Happy new year everyone! On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 8:02 PM Vittorio Giovara wrote: > Hello > > I believe my commit rights were removed without rightful cause and more > importantly without due process. > > I request a formal apology from the perpetrator and my rights reinstated

[FFmpeg-devel] commit access removed

Hello I believe my commit rights were removed without rightful cause and more importantly without due process. I request a formal apology from the perpetrator and my rights reinstated at once. Thank you -- Vittorio ___ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: Your message to ffmpeg-devel awaits moderator approval

On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 8:04 PM James Almer wrote: > On 12/27/2024 9:58 PM, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 11:46 AM Michael Niedermayer < > mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > wrote: > > > >> Hi Anton > >> > >> On T

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Worsening messages

$ git push FATAL: W any ffmpeg vittorio DENIED by fallthru fatal: Could not read from remote repository. On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 8:31 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > This was also not a mail written in jest or a mail written in anger. > You were so not-angry that you removed my commit access, w

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: Your message to ffmpeg-devel awaits moderator approval

On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 11:46 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Anton > > On Tue, Dec 24, 2024 at 06:24:40AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-12-23 21:37:32) > > > If i stand by and do nothing, THAT would be abusing of my power > > > > Behold, the favorite excuse

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Worsening messages

On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 10:32 AM James Almer wrote: > > I'm not going to address the rest of your revisionist history. > > There are more polite ways to say you disagree with his version of the > events. > But that's the problem James. Spreading hate and conspiracy theories and walls of text is

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Worsening messages

On Fri, Dec 27, 2024 at 10:26 AM James Almer wrote: > > That seems to me like more of an implementation detail for scenario 1a, > rather > > than a question that will get us closer to resolving the core issue. > > It's a question to ensure 1a is guaranteed to be successful. Everyone > wants to mo

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Worsening messages

On Thu, Dec 26, 2024 at 1:59 PM James Almer wrote: > On 12/26/2024 12:07 PM, Kieran Kunhya wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 25, 2024 at 1:31 PM Michael Niedermayer > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Community, Community Commitee, Moderators > >> > > > > Your removal of this message as of 1504 GMT 26/12/2024 is compl

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: Your message to ffmpeg-devel awaits moderator approval

On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 3:37 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi > > On Mon, Dec 23, 2024 at 07:44:49AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-12-21 04:57:26) > > > > > > > This is frankly a load of bullshit, and I find it insulting that you > > expect people to swallow

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avutil/timecode: Apply fix from c94875471e3ba3dc396c6919ff3ec9b14539cd71 to av_timecode_get_smpte_from_framenum()

On Sat, Dec 21, 2024 at 7:19 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Found-by: Youngjae Choi > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > --- > libavutil/timecode.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/libavutil/timecode.c b/libavutil/timecode.c > index f40a10eb385..f

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avfilter/vf_scale: remove systematic PAL8 hack

On Wed, Dec 18, 2024 at 12:48 PM Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > > > It is worth pointing out that *libswscale* does not directly output PAL8; > > this rather is (and always was) handled by vf_scale. So in some sense, > this > > functionality already depends on libavfilter. > > > > That said, I do ag

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [ANNOUNCE] upcoming vote: CC election

On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 9:33 AM Anton Khirnov wrote: > Hi all, > the current Community Committee (CC) was elected on 2023-12-05 and its > mandate lasts for one year, so we should hold a new election soon. If > there are no unforeseen circumstances, I would like to start the vote on > Monday 2024-

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc/libx265: flag as experimental

On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 1:07 AM Kirithika Kalirathnam < kirith...@multicorewareinc.com> wrote: > Hi Vittorio, > > The commits in this PR > were > picked > and pushed to the master branch of x265.(b647da9 > < > https://bitbucket.org/mul

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] lavc/libx265: flag as experimental

On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 3:22 AM Kirithika Kalirathnam < kirith...@multicorewareinc.com> wrote: > Hi All, > > x265 v4.1 is > released with the fixes addressing memory leak and other reported > issues.Please check it out. > > *Thanks,* > *

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/infra: List at what companies the name servers are hosted and who provides the servers

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 6:46 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Vittorio > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 05:50:56PM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > [...] > > And it took three weeks > > of drama on the mailing list to obtain this information. And you think > this &g

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/infra: List at what companies the name servers are hosted and who provides the servers

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 4:20 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Vittorio > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 03:56:05PM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:56 AM Michael Niedermayer < > mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > wrote: > > > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] doc/infra: List at what companies the name servers are hosted and who provides the servers

On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 11:56 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Kieran > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2024 at 12:01:03AM +, Kieran Kunhya via ffmpeg-devel > wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Nov 2024, 23:32 Michael Niedermayer, > > wrote: > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > > > --- > > > doc/infra.tx

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] doc/community: Add a policy about using FFmpeg name in public events

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 7:33 PM compn wrote: > On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 18:52:02 -0500 > Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 6:11 PM compn wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:37:52 -0500 > > > Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] [GA Vote required] Code of Conduct change re step down requests

On Tue, Nov 26, 2024 at 7:03 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > And you ask me to resign, and have various other demands, like what > should > > > and should not be in the Code of Conduct. And in another thread > > > say the way to make these mails from you stop is to do what you ask > for. > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] doc/community: Add a policy about using FFmpeg name in public events

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 6:11 PM compn wrote: > On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:37:52 -0500 > Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 5:09 PM compn wrote: > > > > > you'll have to get the trademark owners agreement to publish any rules > > > of

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] doc/community: Add a policy about using FFmpeg name in public events

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 5:09 PM compn wrote: > On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 17:01:47 -0500 > Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 4:52 PM compn wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:27:13 -0500 > > > Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > &g

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] doc/community: Add a policy about using FFmpeg name in public events

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 4:52 PM compn wrote: > On Mon, 25 Nov 2024 14:27:13 -0500 > Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > > +* To represent FFmpeg in any product, conference, or tradeshow, you must > > obtain > > you'll have to get the trademark owners agreement to publ

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] doc/community: Add a policy about using FFmpeg name in public events

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 2:32 PM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > Le maanantaina 25. marraskuuta 2024, 21.27.13 EET Vittorio Giovara a écrit > : > > --- > > Here are some initial talking points, I wasn't sure where to put this so > I > > thought community.texi was ok,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: deprecate sonic

On Mon, Nov 25, 2024 at 12:13 AM Anton Khirnov wrote: > Quoting Vittorio Giovara (2024-11-20 23:14:03) > > On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 7:47 AM J. Dekker wrote: > > > > > This is an experimental and research codec of which ffmpeg is the only > > > encoder and decod

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] doc/community: Add a policy about using FFmpeg name in public events

--- Here are some initial talking points, I wasn't sure where to put this so I thought community.texi was ok, please let me know your thoughts. Ideally we should have the GA vote on this when we reach consensus (or get close to it). Thanks Vittorio doc/community.texi | 33

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] [GA Vote required] Code of Conduct change re step down requests

On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 7:21 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > > Hey Micheal, > > > > Instead of flooding the CoC with a series of ad-personam rules that will > > grant immunity to you and stifle any voice of dissent, can you answer > > whether you're a professional admin or not? Ignoring the q

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Update MAINTAINERS

On Sat, Nov 23, 2024 at 5:46 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > That's cool, step down from the CC, > > The CC is elected by the people and represents the people. > I presume you voted for someone, and if so your vote was counted and you > have your representative in the CC. Asking someone who you

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] [RFC] [GA Vote required] Code of Conduct change re step down requests

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 7:49 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 09:41:02AM -1000, compn wrote: > > Hello, > > > > as the CoC rules over the GA, then the GA probably has to vote on this > > change? i didnt find any process for changing the CoC, so i send this > > mail. I kindl

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: [RFC] libpostproc splitout

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 6:19 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Obviously if people do not want it, then it wont happen. It would have been > nice if the people would have spoken up in the last 9 months and not waited > until after work had already started. > It would have been nice that STF funds

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] Fwd: [RFC] libpostproc splitout

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 1:45 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > > > > Hi Derek, > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 7, 2024 at 11:04 AM Derek Buitenhuis < > derek.buitenh...@gmail.com > wrote: > > > > > > This work was very easy and not worth even remotely close to 5K

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] root access voting

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 6:35 PM compn wrote: > On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:49:25 -0500 > Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 3:53 PM compn wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 22:42:58 +0200 > > > Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Update MAINTAINERS

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 6:09 AM Marton Balint wrote: > > > On Thu, 21 Nov 2024, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > > I feel nobody, with some exceptions, really wants to be listed here, and > > this file is just an artefact that gets cargo culted because it's how > &g

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Update MAINTAINERS

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 8:00 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 04:56:09PM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 8:51 PM Michael Niedermayer < > mich...@niedermayer.cc> > [...] > > > And also the > > > friendly di

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [RFC] libpostproc splitout

On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 8:38 AM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 08:09:49AM -0500, Ronald S. Bultje wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Fri, Nov 22, 2024 at 7:59 AM wrote: > > > > > the (at least perceived) inaction of the CC in other cases makes this > seem > > > the CC has a h

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/3] doc/developer: Duties of a maintainer

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 7:10 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 03:59:36PM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > Why was this pushed without full approval? > > I had already the feeling some people live in a parallel universe. I guess > that con

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/3] doc/developer: Duties of a maintainer

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 7:16 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 11:30:03AM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 7:42 PM Michael Niedermayer < > mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > wrote: > > > > > Not sure we

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Update MAINTAINERS

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 8:51 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 06:26:25PM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 6:20 PM Michael Niedermayer < > mich...@niedermayer.cc> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] root access voting

On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 3:53 PM compn wrote: > On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 22:42:58 +0200 > Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > > > Le torstaina 21. marraskuuta 2024, 22.34.42 EET compn a écrit : > > > > Why does Michael need to ask the profession of an immediate > colleague of > > > > his? How can he claim th

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Update MAINTAINERS

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 6:20 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi > > On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 04:12:39PM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > This giant list of people who may or may not be active or agreeing to the > > full new rules of the maintainer role overstayed its we

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] avcodec: deprecate sonic

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 7:47 AM J. Dekker wrote: > This is an experimental and research codec of which ffmpeg is the only > encoder and decoder, development has stalled since 2013 and these files > don't exist in the wild. > > Deprecate the encoders to be removed next major bump, decoders to be >

[FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH] Update MAINTAINERS

is -Fei Wang -Ganesh Ajjanagadde -Henrik Gramner -Ivan Uskov -James Darnley -Jan Ekström -Joakim Plate -Jun Zhao -Kieran Kunhya -Kirill Gavrilov -Limin Wang -Martin Storsjö -Panagiotis Issaris -Pedro Arthur -Sebastien Zwickert -Vittorio Giovara -wm4 -(this list is incomplete) +More information can

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/3] doc/developer: Duties of a maintainer

Why was this pushed without full approval? There was an explicit NAK on this set, and additional comments by others Vittorio On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 3:19 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 11:30:03AM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 16,

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [REQUEST] Remove me from GA

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 1:13 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > Note, for cases like STF the community must speak up at the point > before > > > contracts are signed. because after that SPI/STF/Developers are bound > > > by the contract and payment has to occur in exchange for the work. > > > >

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [REQUEST] Remove me from GA

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 12:17 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > > > > Being part of the CC you should answer this point instead of skipping it. > > And it's the second person publicly lamenting how the CC is ineffective, > > may you should listen! > > My personal suggestion or question, why don't y

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] doc/developer: Document how disagreements should be handled

On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 1:44 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote:would follow the same or very similar rules. I agree that some > > > outliers > > > could end with different rules. I dont think as FFmpeg grows this > > > centralized > > > TC system can function. > > > The TC > > > 1. lacks expertiese in

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/2] doc/infra: Document trac backup system

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 6:23 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > --- > doc/infra.txt | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/doc/infra.txt b/doc/infra.txt > index 7d2cfe44c08..10b2b8625cc 100644 > --- a/doc/infra.txt > +++ b/doc/infra.txt > @@

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 1/2] doc/infra: clarify domain name servers

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 6:23 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > --- > doc/infra.txt | 5 - > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/doc/infra.txt b/doc/infra.txt > index dfb13eda7b1..7d2cfe44c08 100644 > --- a/doc/infra.txt > +++ b/

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [REQUEST] Remove me from GA

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 3:50 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Derek > > On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 02:19:45PM +, Derek Buitenhuis wrote: > > Buckle in, this'll be a bit of a ride. Part of it is inflamatory, and > > part of it is paranoid (or not) rants. I accept this may be slander and > > wil

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 2/3] doc/developer: Document how disagreements should be handled

On Tue, Nov 19, 2024 at 1:55 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi > > On Sun, Nov 17, 2024 at 11:03:35AM +0100, Anton Khirnov wrote: > > Quoting Michael Niedermayer (2024-11-17 01:42:20) > > > I think this would work better than TC or nothing process. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] [PATCH 3/3] doc/developer: Duties of a maintainer

On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 7:42 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Not sure we have such a list elsewhere, i failed to find it > > Signed-off-by: Michael Niedermayer > --- > doc/developer.texi | 17 + > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/doc/developer.texi b/doc/develop

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] root access voting

On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 1:41 PM Michael Niedermayer wrote: > Hi Vittorio > > On Fri, Nov 15, 2024 at 10:19:07AM -0500, Vittorio Giovara wrote: > > So when are we going to vote? > > vote about what ? > 1. root access documentation - right now we don't even KNOW who

Re: [FFmpeg-devel] root access voting

So when are we going to vote? Vittorio On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 2:06 AM Rémi Denis-Courmont wrote: > > > Le 13 novembre 2024 00:51:23 GMT+02:00, compn a > écrit : > >> That is a major red flag, very similar to what you yourself claimed > >> as motivation to reject Josh - precarious employment si

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >