On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 6:35 PM compn <f...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:49:25 -0500 > Vittorio Giovara <vittorio.giov...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 21, 2024 at 3:53 PM compn <f...@hawaiiantel.net> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 22:42:58 +0200 > > > Rémi Denis-Courmont <r...@remlab.net> wrote: > > > > > > > Le torstaina 21. marraskuuta 2024, 22.34.42 EET compn a écrit : > > > > > > Why does Michael need to ask the profession of an immediate > > > colleague of > > > > > > his? How can he claim that the answer (or lack therof) is a > "red > > > flag" > > > > > > when he knows the answer full well on account of working for the > very > > > > > > same small business? > > > > > michael works at fflabs, michael knows josh works at fflabs. i > think > > > > > we've successfully established this fact. good job everyone! > > > > > > > > Yes. Josh and Michael have the same employer and the same job, that > > > being > > > > contract FFmpeg software developer (whatever their official JD may > be). > > > > > > > > Do you still not perceive the blatant paradox here? Let me spell it > out: > > > > > > > > If that is indeed such red a flag, then Michael can't continue to > be > > > admin. > > > > If it is not such red a flag afterall, then Josh's rejection is > purely > > > > pretextual (supporting Derek's "conspiracy theory"). > > > > > > > > > > > > > michael is asking about josh's previous to fflabs jobs. > > > > > > i think? > > > > > > > Why are you talking on behalf of Micheal? > > you can see remi quoted derek's mail as a conspiracy. my goal is to > make messages between developers clear on intent and meaning, and to > reduce flaming by having a common understanding of the english language. > we may all speak english, but we were taught and use english in > different ways. this obviously leads to miscommunications. especially > because the rules we all use to make assumptions and inferring are > different. > To be fair, the thread was pretty clear before you started messaging. And then retracted some of your messages. And then started replying on behalf of Micheal. --- in my opinion --- > > He can answer these questions > > himself, > > yes. > > > given that mailing lists are the best form of communication for a > > software project. > > is this sarcasm? /s > Adding a /s at the end does not help or improve the clarity of your message. I was referring to the fact that some people are dead set on using ML only, and I am pointing out all the shortcomings of this media and fallacies of that reasoning. > one developer swore that they didnt have a conversation with me > at vdd, and its only been two weeks ago. three developers said i > misrepresented what was said at vdd. i wouldve preferred a recorded > medium if i knew peoples' memories would be this awful to deal with. > That's not really what happened but given we're in a post truth world, let's just drop it > less rushing to judgment and more coding would be better for everyone. > I agree, be a good example and go do that :) -- Vittorio _______________________________________________ ffmpeg-devel mailing list ffmpeg-devel@ffmpeg.org https://ffmpeg.org/mailman/listinfo/ffmpeg-devel To unsubscribe, visit link above, or email ffmpeg-devel-requ...@ffmpeg.org with subject "unsubscribe".
