I too am a non-programmer-type who loves emacs/org-mode. I second this
approach. I don't think it will ever be possible -- nor desirable -- to
create a pure out-of-the-box setup as in window's programs -- but this
approach would work well for those of us able to tinker and learn a
little but not qu
Giovanni Ridolfi writes:
> "Eric Schulte" writes:
>> peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:
>>> Org prepares the body, then tells the mail app to prepare an mail with
>>> it. [...]
>>> On Windows or *nix I don't know, but I can only assume similar
>>> functionality exists.
Just a suggestion from an almo
"Eric Schulte" writes:
> peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:
>> Org prepares the body, then tells the mail app to prepare an mail with
>> it. [...]
>> On Windows or *nix I don't know, but I can only assume similar
>> functionality exists.
>>
>
> My uneducated guess is that it will [...]
> near impossi
Hi Peter,
peter.fri...@agfa.com writes:
>
> So, wouldn't it be good if org could send those nicely formatted
> emails using their mail clients? 'M-x org-send-email' and woosh, there
> it goes!
>
I agree this would be nice, however my initial reaction is that this
will be the sort of project whic
On 31 Mar 2010, at 21:09, Gary wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:53:17PM +0100, Leo wrote:
>
>> although many people have been saying it is
>> intimidating, it is not.
>
> Oh yes it is :)
I kind of agree. This brings up another question, related to the recent
discussion about making a 'read
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 08:53:17PM +0100, Leo wrote:
> although many people have been saying it is
> intimidating, it is not.
Oh yes it is :)
I fondly[1] remember spending *ages* trying to find out how to set the
citation line (you don't, you setq message-citation-line-function
'my-message-inser
Robert Goldman wrote:
> Thanks for the news. I'm looking forward to having a new look at VM, if
> it works well with IMAP now.
>
> Unfortunately, at least the documentation on the emacs wiki for how to
> use IMAP is badly ambiguous. There's a paragraph on the distinction
> between the use of l
Robert Goldman wrote:
> Manuel Hermenegildo fi.upm.es> writes:
>
> >
> >
> > I have to say in VM's defense that it is working very well for me (and
> > has supported IMAP for a very long time)
>
> Is this really true? In my days of using VM --- I eventually gave it up for
> Thunderbird ---
Hi,
wow, that looks really great, thanks :-)!
Do you know by chance if it's possible to link sent mails in threads?
I'm using Gmail and all my sent mail is in a folder called INBOX and
it would be really great if I could see my own messages in the
threads.
Geralt.
Henri-Paul Indiogine writes:
> Dan Davison writes:
>> http://www.princeton.edu/~ddavison/gnus.png)
>
> Thanks for the .gnus code. Actually, I do not use .gnus and place all
> in .emacs but I do not think that matters.
>
> I run Ubuntu Karmic + Gnu Emacs 23. Both updated
>
> Anyway, now my summ
Dan Davison writes:
> http://www.princeton.edu/~ddavison/gnus.png)
Thanks for the .gnus code. Actually, I do not use .gnus and place all
in .emacs but I do not think that matters.
I run Ubuntu Karmic + Gnu Emacs 23. Both updated
Anyway, now my summary buffer looks very much like the image tha
"Eric Schulte" writes:
> At this point it feels somewhat more like voting rather than a
> discussion, but I feel compelled to say...
>
> +1 for gnus!
Hi Simon,
I use gnus, and received help from people on the list. Here's a small
contribution if you do get going with it:
The listing of email
I have to say in VM's defense that it is working very well for me (and
has supported IMAP for a very long time) and there are indeed people
working actively it. The old 7.19 version has indeed been frozen for a
long time, but I am using the latest versions out of the repo on
Launchpad and Savannah
At this point it feels somewhat more like voting rather than a
discussion, but I feel compelled to say...
+1 for gnus!
Gnus has far and away the biggest user base, the best support, and is
the most actively developed (as far as I can tell VM -- which I used for
a couple of years-- is a dead pro
* Scott Brim (s...@employees.org) wrote:
> Wanderlust seems best at IMAP -- I would go there first, but if you've
> tolerated
> mutt's IMAP support this long, maybe you don't need good IMAP support. VM
> has nice integration with w3m for HTML. IMHO don't start on gnus if you've
> never used i
* Richard Riley (rileyrg...@gmail.com) wrote:
> This is pretty "fanboi" of me but its really simple : use Gnus. It can
> do imap fine (you can always move to using a local dovecot
> server and use offlineimap to sync if performance is a problem).
I've had a quick look at the gnus manual and it seem
16 matches
Mail list logo
