At this point it feels somewhat more like voting rather than a discussion, but I feel compelled to say...
+1 for gnus! Gnus has far and away the biggest user base, the best support, and is the most actively developed (as far as I can tell VM -- which I used for a couple of years-- is a dead project). Gnus is distributed with Emacs and all of it's mime and message handling libraries are distributed with Emacs. The config can be daunting if you don't have any help, however there are many friendly people on this list who I'm sure would be happy to share their gnus imap config (please feel free to contact me off list), and once you have the basics working it's really a joy to use. Just my personal subjective biased opinion :) -- Eric Simon Brown <si...@cliffestones.demon.co.uk> writes: > * Scott Brim (s...@employees.org) wrote: >> Wanderlust seems best at IMAP -- I would go there first, but if you've >> tolerated >> mutt's IMAP support this long, maybe you don't need good IMAP support. VM >> has nice integration with w3m for HTML. IMHO don't start on gnus if you've >> never used it. Then there's MEW, which is also a good one. They all work >> with >> mbox-style mail files. > I'm trying Wanderlust, but I've started to wonder if it's worth the > effort. I've moved from mbox to Maildirs but wanderlust doesn't seem > to be able to recognise the subdirectories. I don't want to be > changing config everytime I change a list subscription. I also have > yet to get it to successfully autheniticate with any imap server. > > I've got nowhere near trying the org integration. I might try > installing vm 8.1 but at the moment I've already squandered far too > much time on this. > > Thanks > > Simon _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
