On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Paul H Park wrote:
> I know that login can be disable for system users and groups, but how do I
> refuse email for system groups?
This has nothing to do with Dovecot. Configure your SMTP server not to
accept mail for system groups/users if that is really what you wish to do.
I know that login can be disable for system users and groups, but how do I
refuse email for system groups?
It's a bit of a security/maintenance irritation - I don't want to check for
such spam mail, since that is possible.
Thanks for any help!! Answer preferably given, so that I can configure
On 14.08.2009 23:15, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 8/14/2009, Nikolay Shopik (sho...@inblock.ru) wrote:
I've been trying to use Kerberos and PLAIN text file for
authentication. I've setup deliver in postfix master.cf and make sure
correct username are expanded but deliver is always told me "user unkn
On Aug 14, 2009, at 8:39 PM, WJCarpenter wrote:
These days, standardized digitial signature schemes take into
account legal transformations that can happen during message
transmission. Most of them have a canonicalization formula so that
things still work. However, in early days, various
I was thinking things like: upper vs. lowercase characters, different
line wrapping lengths, possibly some other weird stuff.. I'd think
that all digital signatures break if any of those change? Or do they
really parse the headers and do calculate the signatures using the
decoded base64?
Ye
On Aug 14, 2009, at 7:15 PM, WJCarpenter wrote:
Step 4) Figure out if base64-encoded attachments can be decoded in
a way
that allows re-encoding them back to the exact original encoding.
If so,
save the attachment decoded and add the necessary encoding info the
dbox
metadata.
Although
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 06:47:45PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 18:16 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > > $ cat subscriptions
> > > #Users/te...@merry\2edovecot.shared
> >
> > This really doesn't look right.. I think I'll try fixing it properly. :)
>
> OK, some more patches t
Step 4) Figure out if base64-encoded attachments can be decoded in a way
that allows re-encoding them back to the exact original encoding. If so,
save the attachment decoded and add the necessary encoding info the dbox
metadata.
Although you might like to do that for some sort of tidiness o
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 19:37 -0300, Andrés Yacopino wrote:
Yes, that is a global script.
Yes you are the right , the script is executed again but i thought that
this line do the verification to avoid this:
if header :contains ["To","Cc"] "us...@acasalud.com.ar"
It seems i
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 19:37 -0300, Andrés Yacopino wrote:
> Yes, that is a global script.
> Yes you are the right , the script is executed again but i thought that
> this line do the verification to avoid this:
>
> if header :contains ["To","Cc"] "us...@acasalud.com.ar"
>
> It seems it didnt' bu
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 18:16 -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > $ cat subscriptions
> > #Users/te...@merry\2edovecot.shared
>
> This really doesn't look right.. I think I'll try fixing it properly. :)
OK, some more patches that should fix everything:
http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/5ae611e975a
On Friday 14 of August 2009 at 16:50:08 Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2009, at 10:15 AM, zbiggy wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I would like to have Polish imap folders' names in dovecot instead
> > of English. How I can do this with dovecot?
>
> That would be an IMAP client feature.
>
> > Change tab
Yes, that is a global script.
Yes you are the right , the script is executed again but i thought that
this line do the verification to avoid this:
if header :contains ["To","Cc"] "us...@acasalud.com.ar"
It seems it didnt' but why?, can you explain better?
Thanks a lot,
Andrés Fernando Yacopi
On Sat, 2009-08-15 at 00:09 +0200, Markus Petri wrote:
> The folders were subscribed without the listescape plugin:
>
> $ cat subscriptions
> #Users/te...@merry.dovecot/Shared
Oh, wait, this looks right..
> I deleted it and resubscribed with the plugin:
>
> $ cat subscriptions
> #Users/te...@me
On Fri, Aug 14, 2009 at 12:06:54PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> Maybe it's already saved wrong to your subscriptions file? It seems to
> work with me:
>
> x subscribe shared/t...@domain.org/foo.bar
> x OK Subscribe completed.
> x lsub "" *
> * LSUB () "/" "shared/t...@domain.org/foo.bar"
> x OK L
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 17:17 -0300, Andrés Yacopino wrote:
> I am trying to use sieve_after to execute some redirection of mails.
>
> I have put in the after script:
>
> require "include";
> require "fileinto";
>
> if header :contains ["To","Cc"] "us...@acasalud.com.ar"
> {
>keep;
>redire
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 17:06 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
> On 8/14/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> > Hard links would be the simplest implementation without needing a
> > separate database. Sure you could implement that too if you wanted to.
>
> So... support hard links natively (on FS
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Aug 14, 2009, at 12:36 AM, Gary Chodos wrote:
>
>> We have to replace one mail store (foo.example.org) with another
>> (bar.example.org). I rsync'd the maildirs from foo to bar today and
>> the plan is to hold all delivery (in the SMTP server) on foo
On 8/14/2009 5:07 PM, Andrés Yacopino wrote:
> Well i delete the antispam and antivirus to make a more easy reading
> logfile:
Or you could disable verbose logging (in master.cf) for postfix - it
isn't normally needed for basic troubleshooting...
--
Best regards,
Charles
Well i delete the antispam and antivirus to make a more easy reading
logfile:
Aug 14 21:40:23 acamail postfix/smtpd[11036]: 8849C6FEE9:
client=acamail.acasalud.com.ar[127.0.0.1]
Aug 14 21:40:23 acamail postfix/cleanup[11038]: 8849C6FEE9:
message-id=<921466190722c1dd536fd75de5756eb4.squir...@1
On 8/14/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> Hard links would be the simplest implementation without needing a
> separate database. Sure you could implement that too if you wanted to.
So... support hard links natively (on FS that support them), then allow
for supporting other backend storage
Well i delete the antispam and antivirus to make a more easy reading
logfile:
Aug 14 21:40:23 acamail postfix/smtpd[11036]: 8849C6FEE9:
client=acamail.acasalud.com.ar[127.0.0.1]
Aug 14 21:40:23 acamail postfix/cleanup[11038]: 8849C6FEE9:
message-id=<921466190722c1dd536fd75de5756eb4.squir...@1
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 13:54 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > Step 4) Figure out if base64-encoded attachments can be decoded in a way
> > that allows re-encoding them back to the exact original encoding. If so,
> > save the attachment decoded and add the necessary encoding
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Step 4) Figure out if base64-encoded attachments can be decoded in a way
that allows re-encoding them back to the exact original encoding. If so,
save the attachment decoded and add the necessary encoding info the dbox
metadata.
Or perhaps just store them compressed. How muc
The logs says:
Andrés Fernando YacopinoAug 14 21:13:25 acamail postfix/smtpd[10562]:
connect from acamail.acasalud.com.ar[127.0.0.1]
Aug 14 21:13:25 acamail postfix/smtpd[10562]: 1F9DD6FEE0:
client=acamail.acasalud.com.ar[127.0.0.1]
Aug 14 21:13:25 acamail postfix/cleanup[10564]: 1F9DD6FEE0:
m
Andrés Yacopino wrote:
Greetings, i am testing:
- dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.1.11
- dovecot 1.2.3
- dovecot-1.2-managesieve-0.11.8 (with patch)
I am trying to use sieve_after to execute some redirection of mails.
I have put in the after script:
require "include";
require "fileinto";
if header :cont
Greetings, i am testing:
- dovecot-1.2-sieve-0.1.11
- dovecot 1.2.3
- dovecot-1.2-managesieve-0.11.8 (with patch)
I am trying to use sieve_after to execute some redirection of mails.
I have put in the after script:
require "include";
require "fileinto";
if header :contains ["To","Cc"] "us...@
Step 4) Figure out if base64-encoded attachments can be decoded in a way
that allows re-encoding them back to the exact original encoding. If so,
save the attachment decoded and add the necessary encoding info the dbox
metadata.
Or perhaps just store them compressed. How much of a difference is th
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:40 -0700, Jason Fesler wrote:
> > Hard links would be the simplest implementation without needing a
> > separate database. Sure you could implement that too if you wanted to.
>
> It would be worth checking the limits for hard links, and making sure they
> are suitable for
Hard links would be the simplest implementation without needing a
separate database. Sure you could implement that too if you wanted to.
It would be worth checking the limits for hard links, and making sure they
are suitable for a large mail system using this scheme, without having a
fallback
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 14:18 -0500, Eric Jon Rostetter wrote:
> Quoting Timo Sirainen :
>
> > 1) When writing the data, extract the attachments and write them to
> > different files. Add pointers to those files to the EXT_REF metadata.
> > Dovecot's message parsers should make this not-too-difficul
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 12:06 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> Now do we need to implement some kind of external database for tracking
> the attachments between mailboxes? Any thoughts on what that should
> look like?
I think:
Step 1) Calculate SHA256 of the attachment and get base64 sum of it.
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
1) When writing the data, extract the attachments and write them to
different files. Add pointers to those files to the EXT_REF metadata.
Dovecot's message parsers should make this not-too-difficult to
implement.
I'd rather it did mime parts, rather than attachments. I
On 8/14/2009, Nikolay Shopik (sho...@inblock.ru) wrote:
> I've been trying to use Kerberos and PLAIN text file for
> authentication. I've setup deliver in postfix master.cf and make sure
> correct username are expanded but deliver is always told me "user unknown".
It is best to provide full logs,
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 11:28 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
What would be involved in implementing SIS within Dovecot? A new or
modified mailbox format?
It could be added to dbox without too much trouble. I already kind of
planned for it:
/* Pointer to ext
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 11:28 -0700, Daniel L. Miller wrote:
> What would be involved in implementing SIS within Dovecot? A new or
> modified mailbox format?
It could be added to dbox without too much trouble. I already kind of
planned for it:
/* Pointer to external message data. Format i
What would be involved in implementing SIS within Dovecot? A new or
modified mailbox format?
--
Daniel
I've been trying to use Kerberos and PLAIN text file for authentication.
I've setup deliver in postfix master.cf and make sure correct username
are expanded but deliver is always told me "user unknown".
I can logon into mailbox using Kerberos w/o problems and can send
emails. Looks like Dovecot
Thank you for your response. It helped a lot. The contents of the conf
file is:
connect = host=localhost dbname=[db] user=[*] password=[*]
user_query = SELECT CONCAT('maildir:', domain.home_dir, '/mail/',
mailbox.maildir, 'mail') as mail, domain.uid, domain.gid,
CONCAT('quota=maildir:storage
See if this helps: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/4c42e72a3954
Also you could check if you have any mails with CRs in them:
perl -ne 's/\r$//;print if /\r/' *
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hello,
We've also tried setting the size of the msgs to be the same, just in
case that made a difference. Here is some output from our old mail
server during the test:
==
uidl
+OK uidl command accepted.
1 a=="!(3N"!&D'"!87D"!
2 _
Hello,
Thanks again - your reply will help greatly.
I have a rather more annoying problem at the moment, best described by
my conversation in the dovecot IRC channel...
i've telnetted to 110 on old server
the "uidl" command shows 3 UIDLs
uidl command also shows 3 UIDLs from new server...
trou
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 16:38 +1000, Phillip Macey wrote:
> Maybe I can narrow it down to a particular email and then we
> can take it from there.
Yeah, that would be good.
> * It seems to be an attribute of the destination folder. I can
> successfully move the mail into a new (empty) folder. As
Timo Sirainen schrieb:
> On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 18:08 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
>> Hi @ll,
>> has anybody tried this with dovecot yet ?
>> http://www.xtreemfs.org/
>
> Looks like it uses FUSE, so probably works as well/badly as glusterfs.
> mail_nfs_*=yes settings probably help if you intend
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 18:08 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
> Hi @ll,
> has anybody tried this with dovecot yet ?
> http://www.xtreemfs.org/
Looks like it uses FUSE, so probably works as well/badly as glusterfs.
mail_nfs_*=yes settings probably help if you intend to have multiple
servers access th
Hi @ll,
has anybody tried this with dovecot yet ?
http://www.xtreemfs.org/
--
Best Regards
MfG Robert Schetterer
Germany/Munich/Bavaria
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 16:46 +1000, Phillip Macey wrote:
> >> I also needed to change src/master/master-login-interface.h
> >> #define MASTER_LOGIN_MAX_DATA_SIZE (8192*2)
> >>
> >
> > What do you mean by "needed to"? Was the auth still failing without that
> > change? I don't think it should..
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 11:04 +0200, Markus Petri wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 08:23:36PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> > On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 21:47 +0200, Markus Petri wrote:
> > > With listescape:
> > >
> > > It escapes the dot in the domain part of the user.
> >
> > Fixed: http://hg.dovecot
On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 15:39 +, Richard Hobbs wrote:
> > That's better actually, you don't then have to add those ~/mail/
> > compabilitity namespaces.
>
> Well, i haven't added any ~/mail/ compatibility namespaces knowingly...
> i guess they might be in the default config (my version has been
Hello,
Thanks for the reply... everything seem to be working with regard to my
previous questions now, which is great.
Regarding the ~/mail/ issues though, you said:
> That's better actually, you don't then have to add those ~/mail/
> compabilitity namespaces.
Well, i haven't added any ~/mail/
On Aug 14, 2009, at 8:57 AM, Richard Hobbs wrote:
Where should i convert my mbox mailboxes into? "/home/username/
Maildir/"
or "/somewhere/maildirs/"?
Does it actually matter? Is there a standard location that they
*should* go?
It doesn't matter. Maildir/ is a bit more standard, but Doveco
On Aug 14, 2009, at 10:15 AM, zbiggy wrote:
Hello,
I would like to have Polish imap folders' names in dovecot instead
of English. How I can do this with dovecot?
That would be an IMAP client feature.
Change table of folders:
INBOX -> Otrzymane
INBOX is a hard coded IMAP feature.
Sent
On Aug 14, 2009, at 9:01 AM, André Labuschagné wrote:
*Aug 13 10:13:52 li73-31 dovecot: deliver(andre at
paranoidandroid.co.za): Fatal: setgid(501(paranoidandroid)) failed
with euid=104(vmail), gid=106(vmail), egid=106(vmail): Operation not
permitted*
This means that you start deliver as
On Aug 14, 2009, at 8:53 AM, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
My best guess, after looking at dovecot messages in syslog related to
her login, is that Thunderbird is using a secondary imap process to do
this copying and this connection times out due to inactivity, so that
when she sends mail it has to reest
I would move the imap.* to a neverland address while doing the switch
so users arn't opening email while files are being rsynced.
OR, just add a firewall rule to old server blocking imap.
I would also send a notice to uses a few days (preferably a week in a
large setup) saying that email may be i
On Aug 14, 2009, at 8:12 AM, Tom Diehl wrote:
2 BAD Error in IMAP command GETQUOTAROOT: Unknown command.
You need to add imap_quota to mail_plugins.
Hello,
I would like to have Polish imap folders' names in dovecot instead of English.
How I can do this with dovecot?
Change table of folders:
INBOX -> Otrzymane
Sent -> Wyslane
Drafts -> Robocze
Trash -> Kosz
Then I would like to display them using SquirrelMail.
My configuration:
mail_location
Hi all,
Slowly but surely moving forward, I hope...
I get the following error (in the maillog file) after I've installed
Managesieve:
*Aug 13 10:13:52 li73-31 dovecot: deliver(andre at
paranoidandroid.co.za): Fatal: setgid(501(paranoidandroid)) failed with
euid=104(vmail), gid=106(vmail), egid
Hello,
I was on here a month or two ago asking lots of questions about
migrating from uw-imapd/qpopper/mbox to dovecot/maildir. I am now at the
stage where i'm trying to convert all my emails, but i have a few
questions...
Where should i convert my mbox mailboxes into? "/home/username/Maildir/"
o
Hello,
I'm currently on Dovecot 1.1.17 and I have a user that runs into a
problem quite a lot. She's using Thunderbird on a Mac.
When she sends mail, Thunderbird is set up to save sent mail to her
Sent folder. Often (usually when she has not sent another mail for a
long while) when she sends mail
Hi Timo,
Thanks for the reply.
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 10:31 -0400, Tom Diehl wrote:
What is the proper way to get the quota in the database to reflect what is
actually in the users mailbox?
..
quota: dict:user::proxy::quotadict
..
quotadict:
On 8/14/2009, Steffen Kaiser (skdove...@smail.inf.fh-brs.de) wrote:
> However, the reactions to this action is quite wide spread. Some are
> glad, because they can download attachments on demand, others hate
> this extra step. Some user think the mail is altered and the
> copyright of the sender is
> But for example, what I'd really like to be able to do is say something
> like:
>
> SiS_mode = binary,64K
>
> So only binary attachments over 64KB in size would be checksummed and
> single instance stored. I don't care bout the headers, or body text, or
> tiny (< 64KB) sig attachments, or text
On 8/14/2009, Patrick Nagel (patrick.na...@star-group.net) wrote:
> I implemented a solution that works well for us, for a couple of months
> already. It has one serious limitation though, which will make it unsuitable
> for many environments: All mail receivers who are part of the process will be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
On 2009-08-14 17:36, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
>> able to see all attachments of all other mail receivers. So this only
>> works in a cooperative environment.
>
> One can extend that scheme a bit.
>
>> In short, a script (implemented as filter, get
On 8/13/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote:
> The difference between dovecot -n and postconf -n is that dovecot -n
> doesn't show settings that have been explicitly set to defaults.
Ahhh, I hadn't noticed that...
So, should it? To me, it kind of makes sense for defaults to be
displayed comme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 14 Aug 2009, Patrick Nagel wrote:
able to see all attachments of all other mail receivers. So this only works in
a cooperative environment.
One can extend that scheme a bit.
In short, a script (implemented as filter, getting called by pos
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 12 Aug 2009, Timo Sirainen wrote:
So yeah, either one are as reliable as the script :)
Well, I think this is not what the OP intended :)
This will work for only a little amount of mails I see, because:
a) forwarded messages differ,
b) re
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 08:23:36PM -0400, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-08-12 at 21:47 +0200, Markus Petri wrote:
> > With listescape:
> >
> > It escapes the dot in the domain part of the user.
>
> Fixed: http://hg.dovecot.org/dovecot-1.2/rev/0463fc241aae
>
It seems, the problem is not fi
Am 14.08.2009 um 10:54 schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
plugin:
acl: vfile:/var/vmail/%d/etc/acls:cache_secs=300
I do not use global ACLs, but mailbox-specific ones:
acl: vfile::cache_secs=300
Then one adds t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 13 Aug 2009, Thomas Leuxner wrote:
plugin:
acl: vfile:/var/vmail/%d/etc/acls:cache_secs=300
I do not use global ACLs, but mailbox-specific ones:
acl: vfile::cache_secs=300
Then one adds the ACLs to .dovecot-acl files located in each mail
Wouter van der Schagt schreef:
Did you read this page ?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.2
Actually I did. Twice even. Somehow I thought those settings did not
apply to me since currently we only use the pop3 protocol. Pretty
stupid eh?
My apologies.
Sincerely,
- Wouter van der Schagt
Did you read this page ?
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Upgrading/1.2
Actually I did. Twice even. Somehow I thought those settings did not apply
to me since currently we only use the pop3 protocol. Pretty stupid eh?
My apologies.
Sincerely,
- Wouter van der Schagt
Wouter van der Schagt schreef:
If you find out anything, add it to the wiki..
Upgrade went relatively smooth. I did get 2 error messages though in
the errorlog.
Error: Error in configuration file /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf line
18: Unknown setting: ssl_disable
Error: Error in configuration
Some log examples. Trying to create a new mailbox "Newsletters.123"
under Public/ with a prepopulated "Newsletters.123" ACL file. Although
it reads that file, it does not allow creation of the mailbox. NB: You
wouldn't have a glass ball to predict the mailbox name.
2009-08-14 10:05:05 IMAP(
If you find out anything, add it to the wiki..
Upgrade went relatively smooth. I did get 2 error messages though in the
errorlog.
Error: Error in configuration file /usr/local/etc/dovecot.conf line 18:
Unknown setting: ssl_disable
Error: Error in configuration file /usr/local/etc/dovecot.con
76 matches
Mail list logo
