On Fri, 2009-08-14 at 17:06 -0400, Charles Marcus wrote: > On 8/14/2009, Timo Sirainen (t...@iki.fi) wrote: > > Hard links would be the simplest implementation without needing a > > separate database. Sure you could implement that too if you wanted to. > > So... support hard links natively (on FS that support them), then allow > for supporting other backend storage implementations with plugins... ?
Well, I'm not going to implement either anytime soon. So depends on whoever happens to want this feature enough to actually code it. :)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
