rubygem-fog license corrected

In F26, the rubygem-fog license declaration was changed from "MIT" to "MIT or ASL 2.0". Vít ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: RFC: Storing Automated Tasks/Tests In Dist-Git

Hi Tim, How about this use case: Let say I have Ruby on Rails. This framework is much broader then one rubygem-rails package. Where test for such framework will be stored? How about tests, which might cover multiple versions of components? Lets say I will have some generic test cases which shoul

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

Dne 9.10.2016 v 05:42 Nick Coghlan napsal(a): > On 8 October 2016 at 23:13, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> These python[23][1-9] packages are entirely unnecessary and should go away >> ASAP. > They're not unnecessary for Python developers, as if you want to make > sure you're not accidentally using any

Re: F26 Self Contained Change: Jekyll

Is it F26 or F25 change? Vít Dne 10.10.2016 v 10:30 Jan Kurik napsal(a): > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Jekyll = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Jekyll > > Change owner(s): > * Björn Esser < besser82 AT fedoraproject DOT org > > > > Transform your plain text into static websites

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

Dne 11.10.2016 v 01:59 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): > On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 10:29:16AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Dne 9.10.2016 v 05:42 Nick Coghlan napsal(a): >>> On 8 October 2016 at 23:13, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>>> These python[23][1-9] p

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

Just FTR, I opened Ruby upstream ticket asking about the OpenSSL 1.1.0 support: https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12830 Not sure if you'll have also some Fedora specific tracker Vít Dne 10.10.2016 v 16:29 Tomas Mraz napsal(a): > On So, 2016-10-08 at 13:37 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>

Re: including EOL and vulnerable software in Fedora

Dne 11.10.2016 v 12:57 Petr Viktorin napsal(a): > > The alternative to packaging those Pythons in Fedora is putting them > in some COPR. I believe this would send a bad message. If we want to > make Fedora friendly for Python developers, we should make > cross-version testing officially supported

Re: OpenSSL 1.1.0 in Rawhide very soon

Dne 10.10.2016 v 16:29 Tomas Mraz napsal(a): > On So, 2016-10-08 at 13:37 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> Tomas Mraz wrote: >>> At worst if the patching of a package is highly non-trivial and the >>> upstream is not responsive we might have to drop the package from >>> Fedora. >>> >>> We do not wan

Re: Copr && Rawhide -- no "rolling updates" workflow

Dne 13.10.2016 v 09:37 Neal Gompa napsal(a): > On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 3:11 AM, Michal Novotny wrote: >> The description of Kevin is very precise. I am additionally thinking about >> implementing >> user option to rebuild all project packages for a new target when added. So >> when f27 is added,

Ruby 2.0 in F19

Hi everybody, According to Ruby 2.0 release schedule: - code freeze: 23 Dec. - 2.0.0-rc1 release: 1W Jan. (expected) - 2.0.0-rc2 release: 1W Feb. (expected) - 2.0.0-p0 release: 24 Feb. the official release date is quickly approaching. Therefore, I would like to update you about current

Re: Ruby 2.0 in F19

Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a): Sigh ... now there are *three* incompatible Ruby syntax / semantics "standards" to deal with. Don't spread FUD please. Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to manage their own Ruby environments? ;-) There used to

Re: system-config-firewall conntrack patch

Thanks Andrew, I am forwarding this to system-config-firewall maintainers, who might be interested. Vít Dne 24.12.2012 21:02, Andrew Wyatt napsal(a): Howdy folks, saw that you hadn't patched system-config-firewall to support conntrack so I thought I'd send our patch your way. Not a large

Re: rawhide report: 20121226 changes

Dne 26.12.2012 23:49, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): [ansible] ansible-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires python-keyczar ansible-node-fireball-0.9-1.fc19.noarch requires python-keyczar Should be fixed tomorrow now that python-keyczar is approved. [cp2k] cp2k-mpich2-2.3-1.fc19.

Re: rawhide report: 20121228 changes

Dne 28.12.2012 15:39, Michael Scherer napsal(a): [root] root-graf3d-gl-5.34.02-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.1.7()(64bit) doesn't even let a srpm be created on F18, and fail on this line : %if %{?fedora}%{!?fedora:0} >= 17 || %{?rhel}%{!?rhel:0} >= 7 ( and as a side note, the spec

Re: Ruby 2.0 in F19

Dne 2.1.2013 12:08, Stijn Hoop napsal(a): Hi, On Wed, 02 Jan 2013 10:59:46 +0100 Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 21.12.2012 20:58, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky napsal(a): Why don't we just ship 'rvm' or 'rbenv' and force everyone to manage their own Ruby environments? ;-) There

Re: rawhide report: 20121228 changes

Dne 2.1.2013 13:19, Panu Matilainen napsal(a): On 01/02/2013 01:53 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 28.12.2012 15:39, Michael Scherer napsal(a): [root] root-graf3d-gl-5.34.02-1.fc19.x86_64 requires libGLEW.so.1.7()(64bit) doesn't even let a srpm be created on F18, and fail on this line :

Re: rawhide report: 20121226 changes

Dne 2.1.2013 20:07, Bill Nottingham napsal(a): Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said: On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 12:08:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Hm, wondering why there are not automatically filled bugs about broken dependencies. Wouldn't it be easier for tracking such issues? The o

Re: Fedora 18 issues with translations and keymaps

Dne 3.1.2013 10:51, Adam Williamson napsal(a): On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 20:17 +1030, William Brown wrote: On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 01:42 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 09:23 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: On 01/03/2013 08:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote: Hey, folks. I'm not

Re: Fedora 18 issues with translations and keymaps

Dne 3.1.2013 11:34, Adam Williamson napsal(a): On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 11:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 3.1.2013 10:51, Adam Williamson napsal(a): On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 20:17 +1030, William Brown wrote: On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 01:42 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: On Thu, 2013-01-03 at 09:23

Re: Drop of the "libjpeg-turbo jpeg8 ABI" feature

Dne 16.1.2013 17:42, Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a): - Original Message - Hello all, after discussion with libjpeg and libjpeg-turbo upstreams I decided to drop the "jpeg8 API/ABI" feature and include only jpeg6 API/ABI. Ok, I'm going to switch libjpeg-turbo-jpeg8-ABI to incomplete category

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Ruby 2.0.0 - the latest stable version of Ruby, with major increases in speed and reliability

Dne 16.1.2013 21:18, Bill Nottingham napsal(a): Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said: Yet, it is source level backward compatible with Ruby 1.9.3, so your software will continue to work. The updated Ruby also provides better integration with Fedora, especially JRuby. But not only JRuby, it

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Ruby 2.0.0 - the latest stable version of Ruby, with major increases in speed and reliability

Dne 17.1.2013 14:13, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): On Thu, 17 Jan 2013 13:00:33 +0100 Vít Ondruch wrote: Yes, everything needs rebuild. It needs rebuild also due to change from ruby(abi) to ruby(release) we are proposing in guildelines draft and which was discussed on packaging list (it would need

Re: To the Mate package maintainers

Dne 19.1.2013 12:46, Tomasz Torcz napsal(a): On Sat, Jan 19, 2013 at 11:11:29AM +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Fri, 18 Jan 2013 18:10:06 -0500, Sam Varshavchik wrote: I see that Gnome's lock screen now shows a pretty clock, after the display wakes up, that must be "swiped" away in order to

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Ryu - Network Operating System

Dne 23.1.2013 16:44, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn napsal(a): On 01/23/2013 04:25 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Features/Ryu = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ryu Feature owner(s): Isaku Yamahata Ryu Network Operating System http://www.osrg.net/ryu/ == Detailed description == Ryu is an Operat

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: JRuby 1.7 - JRuby is an alternative Ruby implementation

Dne 23.1.2013 18:59, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a): On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: = Features/JRuby 1.7 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/JRuby_1.7 What should "/usr/bin/ruby" point to? During standard Gem packaging process, the executable files in Gems get sheba

Re: drop inheritance at f19 branch point?

Dne 23.1.2013 22:38, Lennart Poettering napsal(a): On Wed, 23.01.13 14:20, Kevin Fenzi (ke...@scrye.com) wrote: I know we have discussed this before, but I've filed a FESCo ticket to ask them one way or another about the issue: https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1005 Feedback welcome. If y

Re: drop inheritance at f19 branch point?

Dne 24.1.2013 11:22, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 10:38:00AM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: And I disagree with this proposal. It is mixed for me. Sometimes, I'd like to update in Rawhide, especially if the freeze is taking long, while in other cases, I need to do

Remove retired packages

Dne 23.1.2013 21:04, Bruno Wolff III napsal(a): One possiblity here would be to create a special package that obsoletes all of the dropped packages from the last release (or two depending on how far back you want to yum update from). Actually, this is cool idea IMO. Why this package does not e

Re: drop inheritance at f19 branch point?

Dne 24.1.2013 14:40, Bruno Wolff III napsal(a): On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:06:21 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: It definitely depends on package. I should be the one who knows about my packages the best if there is some breaking potential. Every time you don't do an update in rawhide and

Re: Remove retired packages

Dne 24.1.2013 14:18, Michael Schwendt napsal(a): On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:13:09 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 23.1.2013 21:04, Bruno Wolff III napsal(a): One possiblity here would be to create a special package that obsoletes all of the dropped packages from the last release (or two depending

Re: drop inheritance at f19 branch point?

Dne 25.1.2013 00:02, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 15:09:57 +0100 Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 24.1.2013 14:40, Bruno Wolff III napsal(a): On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 13:06:21 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: It definitely depends on package. I should be the one who knows about my packages

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

Dne 29.1.2013 14:56, Christopher Meng napsal(a): Funny...I suggest that we can submit a changing desktop feature per release. Maybe this is the best solution. It might be nice extension to different wallpaper in every release ;) Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org ht

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: QXL/Spice KMS Driver

Dne 31.1.2013 12:52, Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a): = Features/QXLKMSSupport = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/QXLKMSSupport Feature owner(s): Alon Levy Currently the QXL driver is X.org only, a KMS driver is required to move forward with projects like spice 3D, and also to allow more feat

Re: Fedora 19 schedule's new home & plans

Dne 1.3.2013 14:09, Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a): Hi all! (and sorry for post to sooo many lists) As we already have a final schedule (for a three weeks now) and we're getting closer to release windmills - I'd like to make the schedule easy to use for everyone (and that means for me too), to be sure

rubygem-fast_gettext license change

Hi all, I have updated rubygem-fast_gettext to 0.7.0 version in rawhide and it changed license from Public Domain to MIT. Please note that there are also some bit licensed under the same terms as Ruby. Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mai

rubygem-pg licesne change

Hi all, I have updated rubygem-pg to 0.14.0 version in rawhide and it is now shipped under the same terms as Ruby, i.e. BSD or Ruby licenses and some bits are distributed under PostgreSQL license Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

Dne 7.3.2013 14:10, Darryl L. Pierce napsal(a): On Thu, Mar 07, 2013 at 07:50:59AM -0500, Darryl L. Pierce wrote: On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 01:20:22PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: Package rubygem-acts-as-list (orphan) I've taken this one. Anybody want to co-maintain? Package spicebird (orphan

Re: rawhide report: 20130309 changes

Dne 9.3.2013 14:57, Fedora Rawhide Report napsal(a): Compose started at Sat Mar 9 08:15:06 UTC 2013 Broken deps for x86_64 -- [rubygem-sequel] rubygem-sequel-3.45.0-1.fc19.noarch requires ruby(release) This was meant to be build

Ruby 2.0 in F19/Rawhide

Hi everybody, Ruby 2.0 just landed in F19/Rawhide [1]. Since the rebuild was not as fast as one would wish, there will be probably plenty of broken dependencies. I kindly ask you for patience or better for help with fixing any remaining issues. Just rebuild is unfortunately not enough. Pleas

Re: f19 mass branching

Dne 12.3.2013 16:30, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, F19 has been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick up the new branch, additionally rawhide/f20 has had inheritance cut off from previous releases, so this means that anythi

Re: Improving the Fedora boot experience

Dne 12.3.2013 19:16, Ray Strode napsal(a): Hi, This is an interesting idea, but I don't think plymouth makes it any easier to display CJK & Indic glyphs. (Please someone more technical tell me if I'm wrong here, I vaguely remember this being an issue when we wanted to add a messagse to fedup)

Re: How to update to Ruby 2.0.0 in Rawhide?

Dne 13.3.2013 13:40, Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): I just got notification of this broken dependency: libguestfs has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: On x86_64: 1:ruby-libguestfs-1.21.19-1.fc19.x86_64 requires ruby(abi) = 0:1.9.1 [etc] No problem with that. However I tried to ins

Re: f19 mass branching

Dne 13.3.2013 10:09, Peter Robinson napsal(a): On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 12.3.2013 16:30, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All, F19 has been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to pick up the new branch

Re: How to update to Ruby 2.0.0 in Rawhide?

Dne 13.3.2013 14:01, Jon Ciesla napsal(a): On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 7:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: I just got notification of this broken dependency: libguestfs has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: On x86_64: 1:ruby-libguestfs-1.21

Re: Improving the Fedora boot experience

Dne 13.3.2013 14:23, Ian Malone napsal(a): Are teens and pre-teens fedora's main target audience now? I'm really not sure what it is anymore. Are you suggesting that we should exclude them? Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin

Re: How to update to Ruby 2.0.0 in Rawhide?

Dne 13.3.2013 21:51, Conrad Meyer napsal(a): On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 5:40 AM, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: I just got notification of this broken dependency: libguestfs has broken dependencies in the F-19 tree: On x86_64: 1:ruby-libguestfs-1.21.

Re: f19 mass branching

Dne 13.3.2013 14:28, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 13 Mar 2013 14:03:26 +0100 Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 13.3.2013 10:09, Peter Robinson napsal(a): On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 8:25 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 12.3.2013 16:30, Dennis Gilmore napsal

Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

Dne 14.3.2013 10:43, Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a): - Original Message - unlike other major distros, other updates have less helpful descriptions: * "Update to latest upstream version" * "No update information available" * "Here is where you give an explanation of your update. Here is where

Re: ruby 2 question

Dne 14.3.2013 15:36, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): Hello: Orion Poplawski wrote, at 03/14/2013 07:58 AM +9:00: I get the following build (actually install) error building mysql-ruby: Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.D2sqcQ + umask 022 + cd /builddir/build/BUILD + '[' /builddir/build

Re: f19 mass branching

Dne 14.3.2013 16:17, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a): On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:05:27 +0100 Vít Ondruch wrote: Dennis, I don't blame you, but since you refer the ticket here, I can easily quote: > However, this also means users using branched updates-testing get newer packages than rawhide,

Re: fedora release name problem

Dne 19.3.2013 04:05, Chris Murphy napsal(a): On Mar 18, 2013, at 8:44 PM, Andre Robatino wrote: If we do, shouldn't there be another vote asking if it's okay to make this change, in light of the possible release delay? Definitely not. There is equivalent that doesn't require apostrophe or uml

Re: fedora release name problem

Dne 19.3.2013 12:23, Ian Malone napsal(a): On 19 March 2013 11:03, Marc Deop i Argemí wrote: On Tuesday 19 March 2013 09:27:16 Christof Damian wrote: Fixing an apostrophe – no Umlaut, not apostrophe. Schrödinger*'*s Cat I tried to visualize the apostrophe, but it's not that visible anyway

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 14 November 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

Dne 11.11.2014 v 16:17 Václav Pavlín napsal(a): > I also have one more topic... > > Software written in Go is linked statically and we are not able to > figure out which version of Go was used during build. Means that > despite we have latest Go with all CVE fixed in Fedora, we still have > these C

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 14 November 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

Dne 11.11.2014 v 16:30 Václav Pavlín napsal(a): > > On 11.11.2014 16:26, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 11.11.2014 v 16:17 Václav Pavlín napsal(a): >>> I also have one more topic... >>> >>> Software written in Go is linked statically and we are not able to >

Re: Virtual network interface

Dne 12.11.2014 v 13:40 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > On 11/09/2014 12:20 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> There is means of doing this. For Wired -> Wireless there's relatively >> straight forward ways to deal with it but you need to have support for >> the handover across the entire network infrastructu

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F21 tree

Dne 13.11.2014 v 14:20 Kalev Lember napsal(a): > > rubygem-linecache19 > rubygem-ruby-debug-base19 Removing this two will break rubygem-ruby-debug19, so you should remove it as well (unless maintainer fixes them, which does not appear to be the case). Vír -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

Dne 15.11.2014 v 15:06 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): > Lars Seipel wrote: >> What does the community think of it? Is it okay for our flagship >> applications to carry ads and report tracking data? > No! > > IMHO, we should consider dropping Firefox from Fedora entirely, in favor of > Epiphany for Workst

Re: How many developers Fedora has

Dne 29.11.2014 v 12:56 Pádraig Brady napsal(a): > On 29/11/14 09:44, Ali AlipourR wrote: >> Hi >> Is there any statistics about How many developers Fedora has? > Considering just packages: > https://www.openhub.net/p/fedora-packages > > Of course there are many more behind the scenes of the program

Re: How many users does Fedora have?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 3.12.2014 v 08:47 Michel Alexandre Salim napsal(a): > At the risk of jumping in, here's my own 2 cents on the subject... > > On 12/03/2014 12:30 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> >> >> On 2 December 2014 at 09:15, mailto:jfm...@free.fr>> wrote: >

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 22 nightly compose 2014-12-08 nominated for testing

Dne 9.12.2014 v 04:06 Adam Williamson napsal(a): > Just to recap, the idea here is that we try to get good coverage on the > testing as early as possible, with the goal of giving the developers - > especially the anaconda developers - longer to work on the critical > issues. The earlier we identify

Re: Other download options

Dne 10.12.2014 v 14:38 Maros Zatko napsal(a): >> From: "Reindl Harald" >> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2014 2:29:09 PM >> Subject: Re: Other download options >> >> >> Am 10.12.2014 um 14:27 schrieb Maros Zatko: From: "Reindl Harald" Am 10.12.2014 um

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-01-07)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > * Tentative date for side-tag merge is 2015-01-28 (sgallagh, > 19:09:55) > What does it mean actually? Does it mean that if I plan to do rebuild of Ruby packages in side-tag, I am supposed

Re: Deleting f20-gnome-3-12 copr

Dne 8.1.2015 v 12:30 Felix Schwarz napsal(a): > Am 08.01.2015 um 00:17 schrieb Rahul Sundaram: >> That is kind of a basic requirement. We need to do more. We need to inform >> people when their release is going EOL and we also need to automatically >> prompt users to upgrade whenever there is a n

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-01-07)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 8.1.2015 v 15:03 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > > > On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 10:40 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 7.1.2015 v 21:14 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): >>> >>> * Tentative date for side-tag merge is

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-01-07)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 8.1.2015 v 17:08 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > > > On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 15:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 8.1.2015 v 15:03 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu,

Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

Dear Fedora developers, I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build dependencies, etc. The topic originally spring out in this [1] discussion on packaging list. Interesting FPC discussion on this topic can be fin

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

Dne 12.1.2015 v 14:30 Marcin Juszkiewicz napsal(a): > W dniu 12.01.2015 o 14:08, Vít Ondruch pisze: > >> I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making >> minimal build root really minimal, explicitly specifying build >> dependencies, etc. &g

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

Dne 13.1.2015 v 08:12 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): > On 01/13/2015 07:12 AM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote: >> On Tue 13 Jan 2015 01:35:26 AM CET Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> Vít Ondruch wrote: >>>> I'd like to collect some feedback about the $SUBJECT, i.e. making >

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

Dne 13.1.2015 v 14:02 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:16:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >>> That's simply an idiotic thing to say. What is the progress involved >>> in adding a new BR to thousands

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

look on Fedoras Koji builders. Vít Dne 13.1.2015 v 15:56 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 13.1.2015 v 14:02 Richard W.M. Jones napsal(a): >> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 01:31:06PM +0100, Sven Lankes wrote: >>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 12:16:42PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >>

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

Dne 13.1.2015 v 16:35 Peter Robinson napsal(a): >>> You can interpret these data yourself, but with less packages in build root, >>> I can see: >>> >>> 1) Saved build time >>> 2) Saved network bandwidth >>> 3) Saved storage >>> 4) Less things to break >> Just to make sure I'm reading the data corre

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:42 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): > On 01/13/2015 12:06 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 13.1.2015 v 08:12 Ralf Corsepius napsal(a): >> >> So we are even not able to tell how many packages are written in C or >> C++ in Fedora, since we do not have

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >>> So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is >>> that true, that every package in C/C++ compiled using gcc depends on >>> glibc? Then we can use this query to get the number of packages: &

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >>>> So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is >>>> that true, that every package in C/C++ compiled using gcc depends on >>>> glibc? Then

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:01 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > lets get some > concrete data to look at. So please, is there any chance to get similar data from Koji? You are probably the best person who could provide something similar to my tests. Thanks Vít

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >>>>> So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is >>>>> that true, that every package

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-01-07)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 14.1.2015 v 00:24 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:58:51 -0700 > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:50:06 -0700 > > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > >> You forgot "too many packages?" There are 15842 packages in Fed

Re: F22 System Wide Change: GCC5

Dne 14.1.2015 v 12:53 Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a): > = Proposed System Wide Change: GCC5 = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5 > > Change owner(s): Jakub Jelínek > > Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y, rebuild all packages with it. > > == Detailed Description == > GCC 5 is currently in stag

Re: Remove gcc, gcc-c++ and make from minimal build root

Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:20 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > Dne 13.1.2015 v 18:09 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >> Dne 13.1.2015 v 17:54 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): >>>>> So lets try to find what is written in C/C++ by some different way. Is >>>>> that true, that every package

Koji build root caching

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 14.1.2015 v 16:00 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 14:57:59 +0100 > Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > On 01/13/2015 06:01 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> that all being said. koji doesn't use any caching and will not use > >> the lvm plug

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-01-07)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 14.1.2015 v 15:53 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 10:48:16 +0100 > Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > Dne 14.1.2015 v 00:24 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a

Re: Koji build root caching

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 14.1.2015 v 23:46 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > On Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:40:35 +0100 > Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > Dne 14.1.2015 v 16:00 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a

Re: F22 System Wide Change: GCC5

Dne 19.1.2015 v 17:32 Jakub Jelinek napsal(a): > Hi! > > As FESCO denied mass rebuild of F22, I've adjusted > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5 > the current rpms are built with --with-default-libstdcxx-abi=c++98 > thus will not have standard conforming std::string/std::list by default, >

Ruby 2.2 landed in Rawhide

Hi everybody, Just heads up that Ruby 2.2 landed in Rawhide. We tried to rebuild every package which depends on ruby-devel and libruby.so so most of you should be fine already. Nevertheless, there are still some packages remaining, usually due to other issues then Ruby. Namely, it is (if I have no

Re: Ruby 2.2 landed in Rawhide

Dne 20.1.2015 v 17:44 Jason Rist napsal(a): > On 01/20/2015 08:01 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Hi everybody, >> >> Just heads up that Ruby 2.2 landed in Rawhide. We tried to rebuild every >> package which depends on ruby-devel and libruby.so so most of you should >&

DNF as default package manager

Dne 20.1.2015 v 14:22 Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a): > 1) DNF will be the default package manager for F22 [2], so everything is ok > here. I really wonder what is the state here. This is on my rawhide: # dnf remove yum Dependencies resolved. =

Re: DNF as default package manager

Dne 21.1.2015 v 10:35 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> On 01/21/2015 09:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> It is surprising to see so many packges depending on yum. Yes, there is >>> stuff like rpm-build and mock, >&

Re: DNF as default package manager

Dne 21.1.2015 v 10:57 Jan Zelený napsal(a): > On 21. 1. 2015 at 09:33:31, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 20.1.2015 v 14:22 Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a): >>> 1) DNF will be the default package manager for F22 [2], so everything is >>> ok here. >> I really wonder what

Re: DNF as default package manager

Dne 21.1.2015 v 11:13 Mathieu Bridon napsal(a): > On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 11:02 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 21.1.2015 v 10:35 Peter Robinson napsal(a): >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: >>>> On 01/21/2015 09:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: &g

Re: amending the new package process

Dne 21.1.2015 v 11:49 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos napsal(a): > I'd like to propose an amendment to allow > bringing packages even if no reviewers are available (the typical case). > > Step 6: ... If the proposed package is not reviewed for 2 months, the > package must be reviewed by the submitter, and

Re: DNF as default package manager

Dne 21.1.2015 v 12:04 Peter Robinson napsal(a): But I'm really interested in state of DNF as default too. Should I switch mock to use DNF as default? For me there is still lot of unfinished tasks. E.g. documenting what --installroot should actually do [BZ 1163028] >>> I don't

Re: DNF as default package manager

Dne 21.1.2015 v 12:34 Peter Robinson napsal(a): > Are we expected to cross referencing previous logs to see if there's > changes or if it's the same and provide you that information? We > already have too much to do so it's easier to stick with yum where we > know what the outcome is. Sorry, not go

Re: DNF as default package manager

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 21.1.2015 v 17:12 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:13:24 +0100 > Mathieu Bridon wrote: > > > On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 11:02 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Dne 21.1.2015 v 10:35 Peter Robinson napsal(a): &g

Re: DNF as default package manager

Dne 22.1.2015 v 15:30 Jan Zelený napsal(a): > On 22. 1. 2015 at 15:06:34, Michael Schwendt wrote: >> On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 09:33:31 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>> Dne 20.1.2015 v 14:22 Bohuslav Kabrda napsal(a): >>>> 1) DNF will be the default package manager for F22

Re: DNF and mock

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dne 23.1.2015 v 23:34 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > > The kernel, grub and a few other packages are built on the RHEL6 > boxes, not everything was migrated off of RHEL > Just out of curiosity, what are the reasons? Vít -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- V

Re: Plan of Record for Fedora 22 Network Install Media

Dne 28.1.2015 v 09:53 Kamil Paral napsal(a): >> In Fedora 22, we will be producing four network install ISOs: >> * Fedora Server >> - Server branding >> - Default environment group: Fedora Server >> - Auto-partitioning defaults: LVM on XFS (except /boot) >> - Responsible WG: Server WG >>

Re: NowpPublishing fedora developer PGP keys in DNSSEC

Dne 28.1.2015 v 21:34 Paul Wouters napsal(a): > openpgpkey --fetch pwout...@fedoraproject.org $ openpgpkey --fetch pwout...@fedoraproject.org Error: query data is not secured by DNSSEC - use --insecure to override Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproj

Re: NowpPublishing fedora developer PGP keys in DNSSEC

Dne 29.1.2015 v 15:08 Paul Wouters napsal(a): > On Thu, 29 Jan 2015, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Dne 28.1.2015 v 21:34 Paul Wouters napsal(a): >>> openpgpkey --fetch pwout...@fedoraproject.org >> >> $ openpgpkey --fetch pwout...@fedoraproject.org >> Error: qu

Re: [Guielines Change] Changes to the packaging guidelines

Dne 29.1.2015 v 19:37 Mat Booth napsal(a): > > > On 29 January 2015 at 09:50, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 09:03:05PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > Clarified the naming guidelines to indicate how language > bindings are >

Re: F22: Merge yumdb for yum->dnf migration?

Dne 30.1.2015 v 15:24 Richard Hughes napsal(a): > On 30 January 2015 at 13:03, Casey Jao wrote: >> Currently dnf and yum have their own yumdb's, under /var/lib/dnf/yumdb and >> /var/lib/yum/yumdb respectively. > Just another datapoint: PackageKit also writes to /var/lib/yum/yumdb > > Richard. Jus

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >