Dne 29.1.2015 v 19:37 Mat Booth napsal(a): > > > On 29 January 2015 at 09:50, Richard W.M. Jones <rjo...@redhat.com > <mailto:rjo...@redhat.com>> wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 09:03:05PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > > Clarified the naming guidelines to indicate how language > bindings are > > named: lua-randomdb instead of randomdb-lua: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Addon_Packages_.28General.29 > > Good to have this clarified. However java packages don't appear to > follow this convention. eg: > > antlr3-java-1:3.5.2-2.fc21.noarch > plplot-java-0:5.10.0-11.fc21.i686 > R-java-0:3.1.2-1.fc21.x86_64 > tzdata-java-2014j-1.fc21.noarch > > Does this mean we need to rename all Java subpackages? > > > All language binding sub-packages are named this way, no? > (subversion-perl, plplot-ada, xen-ocaml, etc) > > But doesn't this guideline refer to naming the base package, not > sub-packages? Does it need clarifying further? >
The package == SRPM in this context. It does not apply for subpackages. Use of -perl, -ruby and -java suffixes for specific language bindings is well established practice. But this might be just my opinion :) Vít
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
