Dne 21.1.2015 v 11:13 Mathieu Bridon napsal(a): > On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 11:02 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 21.1.2015 v 10:35 Peter Robinson napsal(a): >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> On 01/21/2015 09:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >>>>> It is surprising to see so many packges depending on yum. Yes, there is >>>>> stuff like rpm-build and mock, >>>> And mock can live without yum. If we only had weak deps allowed in Fedora >>>> mock.spec would have >>>> Recommends: yum >>>> >>>> But I'm really interested in state of DNF as default too. Should I switch >>>> mock to use DNF as default? >>>> For me there is still lot of unfinished tasks. E.g. documenting what >>>> --installroot should actually do [BZ 1163028] >>> I don't think it's ready, it might be useful to have an option to >>> switch it over for local use to enable easier wider testing but I >>> certainly don't think it's ready to be default for mock yet. >>> >>> Peter >> I am using mock for Fedora development with DNF enabled by default and >> it works just fine. May be you want to share what is troubling you? > There is a difference between « it works just fine for me » and « it > works to build the distro » > > The latter needs much more testing and guarantees than the former, > although the former is certainly encouraging. > >
If somebody says "I certainly don't think it's ready to be default for mock yet.", I expect him to have strong evidence that something is wrong, not that something needs more testing. Vít -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
