Re: berlios.de compromised since 2005

Seth Vidal wrote: > Hi folks, > This lwn article reports that berlios.de has been compromised for a long, > long time. > > http://lwn.net/Articles/369633/ > > So I compiled a little list of pkgs that need a look: > > http://skvidal.fedorapeople.org/misc/berlios-pkg-owners-list.txt > > > Here is

Re: Orphaning some packages

Henrique Junior wrote: > Hello folks, > Due to an increasing lack of time I'm leaving my packages orphaned. > Even if I want, I will not be able to devote the attention they deserve. > I would like to thank all the kind help I received over time in the > task of maintaining these packages. > bkch

Re: [RFC PATCH] use sulogin in single-user mode

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Thursday, 21 January 2010 at 18:21, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >> We have an existing bug where if you're in single-user mode, and >> SELinux is active, various commands don't print to the console. >> The root of this is the single-user shell isn't runnin

Re: Purging the F13 orphans

Colin Walters wrote: > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:01:25AM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote: >> >>> How can I take jna-posix? I need it for one of my projects but I don't see a >>> way to take it in pkgdb. I'm speaking for the deve

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote: > 2010/8/3 Jon Ciesla: >>> Also I think that with >>> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged >>> into mainline. So wouldn't it be better to concentrate on wordpress 3? >>> >>

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/03/2010 01:08 PM, Conan Kudo (???) wrote: On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 12:20 PM, Jon Ciesla <mailto:l...@jcomserv.net>> wrote: On 08/02/2010 09:58 PM, Chen Lei wrote: > 2010/8/3 Jon Cieslamailto:l...@jcomserv.net>>: >>> Also I think that with &

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: > On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>>>> Also I think that with >>>>> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has been merged >>>>> into mainline. So wou

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/04/2010 08:59 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>>>>> Also I think that with >>>>>> wordpress 3 the separate wordpress-mu release fork has bee

Re: Wordpress testers needed!

On 08/04/2010 09:03 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >On 08/04/2010 08:59 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> On 08/04/2010 02:43 AM, Adrian Reber wrote: >>> On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 12:20:45PM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>>>>>> Also I think that with >>>>>

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On 08/11/2010 12:19 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 11/08/2010 18:32, Christopher Stone a écrit : >> Im no longer maintaining all my packages >> >> Do whatever you need to do to orphan them or open them up. >> >> Thanks >> >> Bye. > The Full list: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/package

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On 08/11/2010 01:23 PM, Remi Collet wrote: > Le 11/08/2010 19:28, Jon Ciesla a écrit : > >>> php-Smarty >> I'll take php-Smarty. > All ownership taken, except this one. > > + Taken. -J -- - in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d.

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On 08/12/2010 02:25 AM, Jan Kaluza wrote: > On Thursday, August 12, 2010 04:19:25 am Ralf Corsepius wrote: >> On 08/12/2010 03:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: >>> Mike McGrath wrote: Luckily Remi got a list: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/140708.html >>> Unfo

Re: The slip down memory lane

On 08/12/2010 01:39 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > >>> "BN" == Bill Nottingham writes: >> BN> I can't help but note that the slips have become more frequent as we >> BN> started to actually *have* release criteria to test against. We >> BN> di

Re: The slip down memory lane

On 08/12/2010 01:51 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "MM" == Mike McGrath writes: > MM> Possibly also stop changing earlier? > > Not necessarily. We should certainly try to get the earth shattering > changes done as early as possible (i.e. soon after branch) but I > recognize that there

Re: The slip down memory lane

On 08/12/2010 02:14 PM, Nathaniel McCallum wrote: > On 08/12/2010 03:08 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >>On 08/12/2010 01:39 PM, Mike McGrath wrote: >>> On Thu, 12 Aug 2010, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >>> >>>>>>>>> "BN" == Bill Nott

Re: The slip down memory lane

On 08/12/2010 02:22 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said: >> I disagree that a clockwork release schedule is required for quality, or >> even perceived quality. If that's the sort of metric being looked at, >> the user is probably best s

Re: Orphaning all my packages

On 08/13/2010 05:31 AM, Christof Damian wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 10:50, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) > wrote: >> I add himself as co-maintainer of php-pecl-xdebug. >> And If you want, can help with some more packages. Please say, if you want. >> Primarily it may be: php-pear-Str

Re: "Staying close to upstream"

On 08/13/2010 10:47 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> No. No SIG's have any authority whatsoever over individual package >> maintainers outside the packages the team maintains. No one needs to >> "comply" with your requirements. > That's exactly Fedora's organizational problem.

Re: "Staying close to upstream"

On 08/13/2010 12:05 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jon Ciesla wrote: >> My understanding of the SIG concept was that they were groups of people >> who were self-organizing around a particular theme to further that theme >> in Fedora, i.e. Games, Live Upgrade, KDE, etc. > Ri

Re: "Staying close to upstream"

On 08/13/2010 12:23 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > On Friday, August 13, 2010, 1:05:16 PM, Kevin wrote: >> Jon Ciesla wrote: >>> My understanding of the SIG concept was that they were groups of people >>> who were self-organizing around a particular theme to further th

Re: "Staying close to upstream"

On 08/13/2010 12:58 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> The current approach of trying to force maintainers to accept patches >> simply does not work. > The only reason it doesn't work is that our organizational structure is not > built to make this work. > > Kevin Kofler

Re: "Staying close to upstream"

On 08/13/2010 01:10 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Al Dunsmuir wrote: >> The FireFox maintainer might well be viewed as best qualified to >> determine which (if any) distribution-specific patches they want to >> support over the life of the package. If you say no, then put that >> maintai

Re: New bodhi release in production

On 08/13/2010 01:23 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > Doing so would have changed behavior and broken software that relied upon > that behavior. Sounds like a great way to run the distro > With that attitude, how would we ever change gcc versions in a stable release? ;) -J > "Kevin Kofler"

Re: drop default MTA for Fedora 15

On 08/23/2010 02:21 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 8:15 PM, Jon Masters wrote: >> On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 20:10 +0200, drago01 wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Rex Dieter wrote: pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote: > I know its been discussed in the past

Re: process to use when missed a patch addition

David Timms wrote: > Hi, new to git, and while following the "conversion" guide [1], I missed > the fact that I had added a new patch, but not added it to git. > > So the build failed. I have now: git add x.patch > > I'm not sure what is correct procedure to attempt rebuild with the > included patc

Re: rpm builds failing with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found"

Rex Dieter wrote: > Panu Matilainen wrote: > > >> FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which >> causes legitimate specs to fail with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) >> found" errors. This happens when recursively included directories in >> %files are marked with trai

Re: rpm builds failing with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) found"

Jon Ciesla wrote: > Rex Dieter wrote: > >> Panu Matilainen wrote: >> >> >> >>> FYI, there appears to be a bug in the just-released rpm-4.9.1 which >>> causes legitimate specs to fail with "Installed (but unpackaged) file(s) >

Re: nonresponsive package maintainer (gget)

> Andre Robatino fedoraproject.org> writes: > >> Does anyone know how to contact the maintainer (Ant Bryan)? >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711629 > > Is there any one interested in taking over this package? If not, what is > the > procedure for dealing with it? (The > https://

Re: on /etc/sysconfig

> On Mon, 18 Jul 2011, Lennart Poettering wrote: > >> On Mon, 18.07.11 15:13, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote: >> >> > On Mon, 2011-07-18 at 20:57 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> > > On Mon, 18.07.11 20:54, Michał Piotrowski (mkkp...@gmail.com) >> wrote: >> > > >> > > > >> > > > Hi, >> > >

Re: boost 1.47.0

> Hi there, > > in accordance with the announced Fedora feature[1][2], we (the Boost > maintainers) plan to rebase Boost to 1.47.0 really soon now. Boost > 1.47.0 has been released recently and Denis Arnaud kindly did the > packaging, so it is ready for scratch builds, smoke testing, and related

Re: Starting a SIG for package reviews

Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "SO" == Stanislav Ochotnicky writes: >> > > SO> I believe you forgot to set whenisgood to use timezones :-) > > My understanding is that you have to log in in order to set your > timezone, or that choosing a timezone was something the responder h

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: gresistor

Richard Shaw wrote: > I have submitted a bug report[1] for a bundled library I found in the > gresistor package while working on a review request of my own. > > Both my package, and the bundled library, have been accepted which now > means there are two packages that provide the same file. > > I ha

Re: abiword

Adam Miller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:00:43AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> Abiword is currently broken in f16/rawhide due to the retiring of >> link-grammar (a FTBFS retiree). >> >> This is currently breaking the Xfce, LXDE, and soas spins. >> >> Would someone be interested in revi

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: gresistor

Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> Email I have is chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com, don't know if that's right. CCd. >> >> http://www.facebook.com/chitlesh >> http://chitlesh.wordpress.com >> http://twitter.

Re: Unresponsive maintainer: gresistor

Jon Ciesla wrote: > Richard Shaw wrote: > >> On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:44 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> >>> Email I have is chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com, don't know if that's right. CCd. >>> >>> http://www.facebook.com/chit

Re: Review swaps

Tom Callaway wrote: > I have two packages that need to be reviewed: > > * gambas3 - IDE based on a basic interpreter with object extensions > ( This one is a bit colorful, but it should be easy enough to review. ) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=710203 > > * freewrl - X3D / VRML visua

Re: New hardened build support (coming) in F16

Steve Grubb wrote: > On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 07:51:07 AM Matthew Garrett wrote: > >> On Mon, Aug 08, 2011 at 11:16:12PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote: >> >>> This list is woefully incomplete. I would advocate a much larger list. >>> For example, sudo is a very important program that we make

Re: Which db should I build this package against?

> On 08/10/2011 07:32 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm working on packaging conquest[1] for fedora which can be built >> against dbase,mysql, postgresql *and* mysql. Which one should I build it >> against? Should I build it against all of them and make different >> subpackages?? > > Did

Re: Need input for creating new icon

Richard Shaw wrote: > I'm working on packaging the spacenav group of programs one of which > is a gui app to setup the configuration of the spacenav daemon. It > currently doesn't provide an icon so I thought I'd try my hand at it. > > Which resolutions do I really need to provide? > > Since I'm a

Re: Need input for creating new icon

Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 10:27 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> I've always made 48x48 PNGs. I don't really know why, but no one's ever >> complained. >> > > I think that's the Gnome 2 default but the icons in gnome shell

Re: Need input for creating new icon

Richard Shaw wrote: > On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > >> Taking into account my total unfamiliarity with the project, is there >> anything about that image that says "Oh, look, it's spacenav!" to those >> who are familiar? Ot

[Fwd: Broken dependencies: vym]

I do some macro gymnastics with vym to prevent it Requiring a perl module that's named one thing in SuSE and another in Fedora. With my latest f17 build, that stopped working, while builds of the same code and spec on f15 and f16 seem to be ok. Did rpm's behaviour change? -J -- in your fear

Re: [Fwd: Broken dependencies: vym]

Iain Arnell wrote: > On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Iain Arnell wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 3:22 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >>> I do some macro gymnastics with vym to prevent it Requiring a perl module >>> that's named one thing in SuSE a

Re: systemd in F15 orphaned?

> > > Am 20.08.2011 20:49, schrieb Michał Piotrowski: >> 2011/8/20 Reindl Harald : >>> >>> Am 20.08.2011 19:58, schrieb Lennart Poettering: On Sat, 20.08.11 16:25, Reindl Harald (h.rei...@thelounge.net) wrote: > WHY do F16 and F17 get permanently updated and nobody cares > about

Re: systemd in F15 orphaned?

> > Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla: >> Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility, in >> what way would bleeding-edge updates to systemd address any of the >> above? >> For games, many would argue the pushing the latest and greate

Re: systemd in F15 orphaned?

> > > Am 22.08.2011 16:36, schrieb Jon Ciesla: >> >>> >>> Am 21.08.2011 22:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla: >>>> Ignoring the pace at which this discussion is approaching incivility, >>>> in >>>> what way would bleeding-edge updates

Re: systemd in F15 orphaned?

> > > Am 23.08.2011 15:36, schrieb Jon Ciesla: >>>> Fedora? Production? I do that, but I'm mental >>> >>> yes - from F9 to F14 this was really easy >>> VMware-Cluster with snapshots, some backup-machines as test >>> all machines

Re: [HEADS UP] remove ddate(1) command from rawhide

> On Monday, August 29, 2011, 7:54:10 AM, Karel Zak wrote: >> I'd like to remove: >> ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates > >> command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very >> very small minority of Fedora users. >> Comments? > > Why does it matter

Re: [HEADS UP] remove ddate(1) command from rawhide

> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:42:18 +0300, KL (Kalev) wrote: > >> On 08/29/2011 02:54 PM, Karel Zak wrote: >> > >> > I'd like to remove: >> > >> > ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates >> > >> > command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very >> > very small mi

Re: [HEADS UP] remove ddate(1) command from rawhide

> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:32:01 -0500, JC (Jon) wrote: > >> >> > On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 15:42:18 +0300, KL (Kalev) wrote: >> > >> >> On 08/29/2011 02:54 PM, Karel Zak wrote: >> >> > >> >> > I'd like to remove: >> >> > >> >> > ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates >> >> > >> >> > c

Re: [HEADS UP] remove ddate(1) command from rawhide

> On 08/29/2011 05:24 PM, Karel Zak wrote: >> I'd like to remove: >> >> ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates >> >> command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very >> very small minority of Fedora users. >> >> Comments? > > IIRC, you are upstream for thi

Re: [HEADS UP] remove ddate(1) command from rawhide

> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Rahul Sundaram > wrote: >> Otherwise,  make >> ddate a sub package and don't install it by default.   Solved? > > As an upstream the willingness of distributions to strip out commands > which I wanted to provide and don't offer a build option to disable > via

Re: floppy support (was: [HEADS UP] remove ddate(1) command from rawhide)

> Chris Adams wrote: >> Why does util-linux have two floppy disk formatters (/usr/bin/floppy and >> /usr/sbin/fdformat)? > > Why does it have any floppy tools any more? The kernel maintainers don't > support the floppy module and the module hasn't been auto-loaded for > several releases. > -- > de

Re: [HEADS UP] remove ddate(1) command from rawhide

> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 08:47:40AM -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> That may be (both are human constructs, it's like say "hey, that's made >> up >> word!", but no, I don't. My point is simply that while it is extremely >> silly code,

Re: [HEADS UP] remove ddate(1) command from rawhide

> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 08:47:40 -0500, JC (Jon) wrote: > >> >> The Julian and Gregorian calendars are also of religious origin. >> > >> > Apples and oranges. >> > >> > Do you find anything like in the "SEE ALSO" section of "man ddate" >> also >> > in "man date"? > >> That may be (both are human con

Re: floppy support

> Jos Vos wrote: >> We just have to wait till people come up with the argument that serial >> or parallel ports don't exist anymore. > > No. You're making an apples to orange comparison. Just like Jon has done > this whole thread. > > This bike shedding as gone on long enough. Playing devil's adv

Re: [HEADS UP] remove ddate(1) command from rawhide

> On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 10:27:40 -0500, JC (Jon) wrote: > >> I'm not suggesting ddate is mission-critical, I just want reasons for >> it's >> removal or re-packaging to be well thought-out, not simply "gosh, I >> don't >> sue that, so. . .". Otherwise we'll start dropping games. > > Sure (and not l

Re: Bundle question

> Hello. > > I'm review jreen library and there found [1] very interesting issue - > psi and kdenetwork bundle iris, jdns [2] and simplesasl. > > For example: > $ find kdenetwork-4.6.5 psi-0.14 -iname simplesasl\* > kdenetwork-4.6.5/kopete/protocols/jabber/libiris/iris/xmpp/xmpp-core/simplesasl.h

Re: Orphnaing some of my packages

> Hi, > Due to a lack of time, and to focus on the pacakges I use, I'm orphaning > some of my packages : > gestikk > > -- Use mouse gestures to control your PC (one bug : > https://bugzil

Re: Orphaning packages

> Hi, > Owing to limited time recently I have been unable to look into my > packages and so I am orphaning the following packages: > > agave > gnujump > mausezahn > moe > peppy > gnurobots > > It would be nice if someone can pick them up. Done, except for agave. Does it need to stay dead? I

Re: [X-Post] Fedora medical needs package maintainers

> Hello all, > > If you've been following the planet[1], you'd know that my GSoC project > this year was packaging for the Fedora Medical SIG. I packaged quite a > few of them during the GSoC period[2]. The issue here is that I cannot > maintain these packages: I do not use them. Are any maintaine

Re: Orphaning packages

> >> Hi, >> Owing to limited time recently I have been unable to look into my >> packages and so I am orphaning the following packages: >> >> agave >> gnujump >> mausezahn >> moe >> peppy >> gnurobots >> >> It would be nice if someone can pick them up. > > Done, except for agave. Does it need

Re: Package review SIG dead?

>> "RS" == Richard Shaw writes: > > RS> After some initial interest there doesn't appear to be any activity > RS> unless I'm missing something. > > Never could gather enough interest for anyone to actually do anything. > Basically I stopped after I called for a couple of folks to help me with

Re: Orphaning pida

> Hello all, > I am planning to orphan pida, I haven't used it since probably mid > F14 cycle and I feel it needs a maintainer that will give it more > attention. If I can get 0.6.2 to build, I'll take it. -J > -AdamM > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin

Re: Orphaning pida

> >> Hello all, >> I am planning to orphan pida, I haven't used it since probably mid >> F14 cycle and I feel it needs a maintainer that will give it more >> attention. > > If I can get 0.6.2 to build, I'll take it. I did. Anyone interested in having pida 0.6.2 would be welcome to review the

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:41 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: >> > On 12 October 2011 17:44, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> > > All existing users of the Fedora Account System (FAS) at >> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts are required to

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 13:06 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:41 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: >> >> > On 12 October 2011 17:44, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> >> >

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 13:25 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 13:06 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >> > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> >> >> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:41 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: >

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

> ons 2011-10-12 klockan 13:25 -0500 skrev Jon Ciesla: > >> Plus, you could have multiple >> keys, all with the same passphrase, for different things, should you so >> desire. > > That's effectively one shared key for all. If one of them are > compromized th

Re: Subject: IMPORTANT: Mandatory password and ssh key change by 2011-11-30

> ons 2011-10-12 klockan 13:49 -0600 skrev Kevin Fenzi: > >> If you can't change your token, then I would posit you have a problem. >> What if you KNEW your private key was compromised? Surely there is a >> way to generate a new one... > > I can change it, but it means changing it for all sytems I

Re: No guidelines for packaging of udev rules?

> On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 08:34:58 -0500, > Richard Shaw wrote: >> Out of curiosity I decided to see if I could package zfs from >> http://zfsonlinux.org/. One thing I noticed is that there are both >> udev rules in /lib/udev/rules.d and /etc/udev/rules.d and I could not >> find any guidelines

Re: Greetings from Olin -- and a package

> Greetings from the quirky engineering school we call Olin. We three > (Kevin, > Ashley, and I) are getting a crash course on packaging and other release > engineering skills from Sebastian (Sdz > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Sdz) > > We've produced a package for the io programming languag

Re: search sponsor

> Hello, > I'm nineteen years old and I'm a french fedora user > I would like to become a packager for fedora > > I have four packages that are waiting to be reviwed : > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726080 > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=732215 > http://bugzilla.redhat.c

Re: sponsor howto?

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335 > > is waiting for a sponsor. > > I'd like to sponsor it. > > What is the procedure? Do I change the > > Assigned To: > Timothy St. Clair (edit) (take) > > By selecting 'take'? It is not clear if 'take' if for sponsoring the > package, > or fo

Re: sponsor howto?

> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335 >> >> is waiting for a sponsor. >> >> I'd like to sponsor it. >> >> What is the procedure? Do I change the >> >> Assigned To: >> Timothy St. Clair (edit) (take) >> >> By selecting 'take'? It is not clear if 'take' if for sponsoring the >> p

Re: sponsor howto?

> Sorry, I'm using the wrong terms. A BR was already opened by > Kapil Arya > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335 > > I have discussed with upstream, and the asked me to take ownership of this > package, which I have agreed to. > > What do I need to do? > If it will be your pack

Re: Orphaning Package

Mike McGrath wrote: > Hey all, I'm doing a horrible horrible job of maintaining my packagegs, > some of which people actually use. Please pick up what you can if you're > interested. Here's the list: > > cacti > I've taken cacti. > perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 > perl-Date-Pcalc > perl-File-RsyncP > pe

Re: Is boost 1.46.1 in rawhide for real?

Petr Machata wrote: > Bruno Wolff III writes: > > >> I don't remember seeing a soname bump announcement for boost and since >> for branched it went from 1.46.0 to 1.46.1 and then back to 1.46.0, I don't >> want to start rebuilding stuff if this is going to happen in rawhide too. >> > > It'

Re: The future of FTBFS?

Matt Domsch wrote: > As my job and family responsibilities have shifted over time, I have > been giving less and less attention to the FTBFS (fails to > build from source) process that I started 5 years ago on a "see, it > _can_ be done" lark. > > I think FTBFS has been valuable. Through the pro

Re: The future of FTBFS?

Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Thu, 7 Apr 2011 10:02:31 -0500, Matt wrote: > > >> I think FTBFS has been valuable. >> > > But of course! > > >> Sure, I get the occasional "why are you filling my mailbox with this" >> message, [...] >> > > Wow. Unbelievable. > How dare you provide m

Re: A "whatuses" command for yum?

Jeff Garzik wrote: > A humble, basic question for you experts... > > Given a library, such as jansson (C JSON lib), how does one > automatically list all packages in the F14 repo which require jansson? > > Must be able to find packages which are not installed on the current system. > > Thanks, > >

Re: Retiring perl-Text-Aspell

Jerry James wrote: > I would like to invoke the EOL process for perl-Text-Aspell in > Rawhide. I will continue to maintain it in Fedora through the F-15 > lifecycle, and in EPEL through the EPEL 6 lifecycle. The package is > already semi-crippled in EPEL 6, since only the aspell-en and > aspell-s

Re: Thunderbird updates mixed up in F14

Kevin Kofler wrote: > Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> Rather find and fix the bug that is the cause of this. There have been >> a few updates like that recently, again. >> >> The 3.1.10-1.fc14 package is tagged dist-f14-updates already: >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2412

Re: Orphaned python-alsa

Without doing any research (since it's Sunday and I'm tired) does this mean it is no longer needed, or that you won't be maintaining it and someone else probably should if they're so inclined? -J On 05/15/2011 02:33 AM, Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote: > Not required by any package other than alsa-too

Re: Orphaned python-alsa

Ok, thanks! Robin 'cheese' Lee wrote: > I just means anybody who would like to take this package should > recognize that it is such a minor package that few people would ever > install it. > > Robin > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote: > &g

Re: How to undo a build

Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi, > I made a build with a wrong spec file (shame on me) and I've untagged > the builds but when I wan to run fedpkg build, it outputs: > > "Could not initiate build: UpTools-8.5.5-1.fc16 has already been built" > > Is there a way to "undo" or "drop" the build and do it agai

Re: Review Request/Review Swaps Request for writetype, pyttsx, python-timelib

Prabin Kumar Datta wrote: > Hi! > Currently, more then 3 of my packages are under review request. > And 4+ packages are already packaged but not submitted for review > since the dependency packages are not reviewed till now (or some other > issues). > > My packages under review: > 1. python-timelib

Re: orphaning 20

Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > - frescobaldi: lilypond editor. > - rumor: Really Unintelligent Music transcriptOR. required by > frescobaldi. has 1 open FTBFS bug #704535. I proposed a patch for the > bug in the bugzilla. > I took these, since I maintain lilypond. -J -- in your fear, seek only peace

Re: Unresponsive Package Maintainer - Lubomir Rintel

Ward, David - 0663 - MITLL wrote: > I'm following the procedure at: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > > Does anyone know how to contact Lubomir Rintel? He is not answering > e-mails at his listed address or the following Bugzilla reports: > > https

Re: Orphaning my packages...

Truch, Matthew wrote: >> I need to orphan all of my packages. In most cases, it would be great if >> someone (or more) could pick them up. Let me know if you'd like any of them >> and I'll release them to you. >> >> kst -- A data viewing program for KDE A great program for plotting data >> (espec

Re: Request for removal of package from Fedora repositories: dasher.x86_64

nodata wrote: > Hello, > > dasher in Fedora has been broken for me since Fedora 12. > > The bug I entered has recently been automatically closed. > > dasher doesn't work in 64-bit and can be crashed by asking it to go > fullscreen. > > What's the procedure to get the package removed? > > Thanks. >

Re: OpenBUGS program has a pre-compiled )S library from MS Windows. Any possibility to package it?

> I decided to try to help the cause of Bayesian statistics and the open > source effort of the OpenBUGS group (http://www.openbugs.info/w/) by > making some packages. In case you are not a statistically-inclined > person, it is worth knowing that Bayesian Updating with Gibbs Sampling > (BUGS) ha

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

> I propose to retire bittorrent (the original python client) for the > reasons outlined below. If anyone's interested in taking it over > instead, please apply on the package database and I'll transfer > ownership. Think carefully before you act though! > > Dead Upstream: > == > Well,

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

> On 06/15/2011 01:37 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> >>> I propose to retire bittorrent (the original python client) for the >>> reasons outlined below. If anyone's interested in taking it over >>> instead, please apply on the package database and I'll tran

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

> 15.06.2011, 21:37, "Jon Ciesla" : >> My only concern is that there be a command-line replacement available. >> šI >> currently fetch my ISOs with bittorrent-curses and screen. šCan someone >> with experience with any of them offer a recommendation? šPy

Re: Review Swaps

> On 06/15/2011 08:39 AM, tim.laurid...@gmail.com wrote: >> 712566 Review Request: gnome-shell-theme-tron-legacy - the tron-legacy >> gnome-shell theme > > This is a pretty clear trademark infringement concern. I'm about to go > block this as FE-Legal, but you should come up with a different name.

Re: Proposal: retire bittorrent

> On Wednesday, June 15, 2011 07:12:56 AM Paul Howarth wrote: >> I propose to retire bittorrent (the original python client) for the >> reasons outlined below. If anyone's interested in taking it over >> instead, please apply on the package database and I'll transfer >> ownership. Think carefully

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

> Due to the requirement for contributors to sign the FPCA by Thursday of > last > week, certain package owners who haven't yet signed will be removed from > the > packager group soon. When that happens, the packages that they own will > be > orphaned. > > To try and minimize the problems this co

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

I'll take atop too. -J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packages that will be orphaned

> > xcowsay I'll take this too. -J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >