On 08/12/2010 02:22 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Jon Ciesla (l...@jcomserv.net) said: >> I disagree that a clockwork release schedule is required for quality, or >> even perceived quality. If that's the sort of metric being looked at, >> the user is probably best suited to RHEL, CentOS, etc. > It would be interesting to look at RHEL/CentOS to see how predictable > their release schedule actually is. I'd wager it's not that predictable > either. > > Bill Good point, I seem to remember talk at one point about RHEL6 being Q2 2010. Not sure where I heard that, though, so someone with better information should weigh in.
-J -- - in your fear, speak only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
