> Am 22.09.2025 um 10:59 schrieb Fabio Valentini :
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 8:14 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>>
>> Anubis is a necessary evil since LLM crawlers started attacking sites
>> causing DOS/DDOS.
>
> Strange, as far as I know, anubis should just let your requests
> through unless your
Anubis is a necessary evil since LLM crawlers started attacking sites causing
DOS/DDOS.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 8:14 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> Anubis is a necessary evil since LLM crawlers started attacking sites causing
> DOS/DDOS.
Strange, as far as I know, anubis should just let your requests
through unless your HTTP client's user agent (or some other metrics)
looks "browser-lik
Until recently, I was able to copy and paste the links on the Branched test
page into my wget script and run my test procedure. Now that no longer works
because some supposed security software wants to check the browser. This
testing is an extremely time-consuming business. Adding additional
aproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/4YGCXLDGRBLJPXIRDO2XNAKQN4A5LNMZ/
>
Thanks everybody for participation, F43 Beta is going to be released next
week.
Please note that this is not the end! We will be working on the F43 Final
in the upcoming weeks, and we wo
Hey All!
During the week of September 22nd - September 26th/2025, the Fedora 43
CoreOS Test Week will be happening. The test week is an opportunity for the
community to test FCOS based on Fedora 43 content before it is released as
part of the `testing` and `stable` streams.
As part of the Test
Hello,
the first F43 Beta RC is here, and we need to make sure it works well. The
Go/NoGo meeting is happening tomorrow [1].
All important information and links are in this announcement:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread
So, for a while now my standard protocol for testing the effects of
updating a package has been to build it and its deps in a copr.
However, this is becoming more and more obviously unreliable because
later builds can use older version of packages from the main Fedora
repos instead of from the
On 2025/07/31 11:04, Andrei Radchenko wrote:
Hello,
I just updated this test plan in new nodejs [0], filling missing
pieces like gating yaml, testing fmf data. Scratch build ran but stuck
on pending and not proceeding to testing.
I suspect it might be because I *just* introduced them. But
Hello,
I just updated this test plan in new nodejs [0], filling missing pieces
like gating yaml, testing fmf data. Scratch build ran but stuck on pending
and not proceeding to testing.
I suspect it might be because I *just* introduced them. But not sure,
technically files needed are present at
On Tue, 2025-07-29 at 13:15 +0100, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Been starting to help out with this today
Thanks! :)
>
> Den tis 29 juli 2025 kl 13:00 skrev :
> >
> > Hi,
> > just a small heads-up that this week is a test week for DNF 5 using
> > Anaconda insta
Been starting to help out with this today
Den tis 29 juli 2025 kl 13:00 skrev :
>
> Hi,
> just a small heads-up that this week is a test week for DNF 5 using
> Anaconda installer. The switch to DNF 5[0] also included dropping
> remaining support for package modularity[1], so this
Hi,
just a small heads-up that this week is a test week for DNF 5 using
Anaconda installer. The switch to DNF 5[0] also included dropping
remaining support for package modularity[1], so this is being tested as
well. We merged the switch to Rawhide a few weeks ago, so a regular
Rawhide boot.iso (or
Once upon a time, Adam Williamson said:
> On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 01:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hey folks! Just a note about current openQA test failures for Rawhide
> > updates.
>
> Update on this: it should now all be dealt with. I put a short-term
> hack in
On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 01:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey folks! Just a note about current openQA test failures for Rawhide
> updates.
Update on this: it should now all be dealt with. I put a short-term
hack in place yesterday and got most updates unblocked, and today
Justin did a
a240bc96...@kernel.org/T/#me2a0f3254a57cdd157ba79344ab8d51476ba18e5
> > , but I don't know if fixing those tracebacks will actually fix the
> > test failures, or if that's some other issue. Also, that patch is not
> > yet merged to mainline, so just doing a newer kernel snapshot build
> > won
On Fri, Jul 11, 2025 at 2:57 AM Adam Williamson
wrote:
>
> Hey folks! Just a note about current openQA test failures for Rawhide
> updates.
>
> Unfortunately it's a bit intractable. The cause seems to be something
> in the kernel.
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/upda
On Fri, 2025-07-11 at 01:57 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> In the morning I'll see if fiddling with the openQA settings to use a
> different graphics adapter mitigates the problem, unless Justin's got a
> new kernel build through and it fixes the problem, or something. Until
> then, F43 updates
Hey folks! Just a note about current openQA test failures for Rawhide
updates.
Unfortunately it's a bit intractable. The cause seems to be something
in the kernel.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2025-0b8ce0290c (kernel-
6.16.0-0.rc5.45.fc43) was gated because of these
Hey All,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.15
Test week is happening from 2025-06-08 to 2025-06-09. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.
As
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 08:54:45AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore via devel wrote:
> Failed to resolve the transaction:
> Problem 1: installed package python3-qt5-webkit-5.15.10-11.fc41.x86_64
> requires python3-qt5(x86-64) = 5.15.10-11.fc41, but none of the
> providers can be installed
> - python3-qt5-5.
Hello All,
Virtualization is a core feature used on a day-to-day basis by multiple
developers, testers
and users. Fedora QA is hosting a Virtualization Test Day[0], where we will
all be testing
the virtualization features for Fedora. The test day app[1] will help
people to record
results till the
Hey All,
This is a gentle reminder that we are hosting Upgrade Test Week[0] starting
today and going through the whole week. Please record your upgrade
experiences in [1]
This will help us not only know the problems you faced (if at all any) and
then resolve
them (if they end up blocking).
[0
On Tue, 2025-03-04 at 16:24 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --
> best distro-sync
>
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem 1: i
Failed to resolve the transaction:
Problem 1: installed package python3-qt5-webkit-5.15.10-11.fc41.x86_64
requires python3-qt5(x86-64) = 5.15.10-11.fc41, but none of the
providers can be installed
- python3-qt5-5.15.10-11.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a
distupgrade repository
- problem with in
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:43:09PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Problem 6: package hyperscan-devel-5.4.1-8.fc42.x86_64 from fedora requires
> hyperscan(x86-64) = 5.4.1-8.fc42, but none of the providers can be installed
> - package vectorscan-5.4.11-9.fc42.x86_64 from fedora obsoletes hyperscan <
On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 06:43:09PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> Problem 2: installed package kf5-kitinerary-23.08.5-3.fc41.x86_64 requires
> libpoppler.so.140()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
> - installed package kf5-kitinerary-23.08.5-3.fc41.x86_64 requires
> libpoppler.so
The mesa-freeworld issue is probably caused by a bad mirror, 25.0.1 is present
in the base repo
https://ftp.icm.edu.pl/pub/Linux/dist/rpmfusion/free/fedora/development/42/Everything/x86_64/os/repoview/mesa-va-drivers-freeworld.html
As for steam, it's a known issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
I have checked the rpmfusion repo's for F42 and they are ready for beta release
$ sudo dnf repoclosure --check rpmfusion-free-updates-testing --check
rpmfusion-free --check rpmfusion-nonfree-updates-testing --check
rpmfusion-nonfree --newest
Updating and loading repositories:
Repositories load
On Tuesday, March 4, 2025 10:24:57 AM Eastern Daylight Time Miroslav Suchý
wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
> distro-sync
>
> This command does not replace `d
W dniu 4.03.2025 o 16:24, Miroslav Suchý pisze:
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal
pote
On Sat, 2025-03-08 at 11:46 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> torque
torque was retired and already don't have f42 branch , the build was
made before f42 branch on rawhide . At first glance the retirement of
the package seem that isn't complete
--
Sérgio M. B.
--
Miroslav Suchý kirjoitti 4.3.2025 klo 17.24:
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal
poten
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 08:58:09AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 09:56:43AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 05. 03. 25 9:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > Hmm, this seems to be an unfinished retirement. We have
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/r
Good evening!
Aside from a handful of downgrades that already appear to be reported, my
primary system didn't encounter any issues with the transaction.
Transaction Summary:
Installing:68 packages
Upgrading: 4188 packages
Replacing: 4205 packages
Removing: 8 pack
Miroslav Suchý writes:
> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best distro-sync
I got a new (= not yet reported) failure:
Problem 1: installed package python3-qt5-webkit-5.15.
On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 09:56:43AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 03. 25 9:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > Hmm, this seems to be an unfinished retirement. We have
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/torque/
> > c/5f8d64fc9a899f4b94e63685a29f4cc95ef2f829
> > but the package is tag
On 05. 03. 25 9:22, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hmm, this seems to be an unfinished retirement. We have
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/torque/
c/5f8d64fc9a899f4b94e63685a29f4cc95ef2f829
but the package is tagged into rawhide.
But the package needs to be obsoleted anyway. I'll add it
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 03:47:30PM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> Tested on three machines running Fedora 41; two of them were a-okay, one had
> some errors:
>
> > Problem 1: installed package libreoffice-writer2latex-1.0.2-38.fc37.x86_64
> > requires osgi(javax.xml), but none of the prov
On Tue, Mar 04, 2025 at 11:24:53PM +0100, Charalampos Stratakis wrote:
> On my x86_64:
>
> Problem 1: installed package libreoffice-writer2latex-1.0.2-39.fc38.x86_64
> requires osgi(javax.xml), but none of the providers can be installed
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/fedora-obsolete-packages/
6 KiB | 00m01s
Fedora 42 - x86_64
100% | 12.8
MiB/s | 35.2 MiB | 00m03s
Fedora 42 - x86_64 - Test Updates
100% | 2.4
MiB/s | 3.0 MiB | 00m01s
Fedora 42 - x86_64 - Up
I had the hsakmt-devel problem too, so I opened
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rocm-runtime/pull-request/11.
On Tue, Mar 4, 2025, at 2:54 PM, Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> On 3/4/25 10:24 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your t
system-upgrade`, but it will reveal
> potential problems.
>
> You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command.
>
> The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the
> actual upgrade.
>
>
> In case you hit dependency issues, please report it a
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-sync
I was surprised by 16 detected downgrades.
Downgrading: (Consecutive spaces are collapsed to avoid line wrap):
criu x86_
no issues here
Intel (RKL, 11 th. Gen.), running Gnome and Xorg
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/p
On 3/4/25 10:24 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-sync
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-syn
; - installed package mysql-community-client-9.1.0-10.fc41.x86_64 requires
> mysql-community-libs(x86-64) >= 8.0.11, but none of the providers can be
> installed
> - mysql-connector-odbc-9.2.0-10.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a
> distupgrade repository
> - problem with installe
a las 16:24, Miroslav Suchý escribió:
Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best
distro-sync
This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal
potential pro
Tested on three machines running Fedora 41; two of them were a-okay, one had
some errors:
> Problem 1: installed package libreoffice-writer2latex-1.0.2-38.fc37.x86_64
> requires osgi(javax.xml), but none of the providers can be installed
> - xml-commons-apis-1.4.01-47.fc41.noarch does not belon
` before running this command.
The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the actual
upgrade.
In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the appropriate
package.
Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in next Fedora. Please
t now.
I guess it also shows why disabling test suites is bad - cxxtools' had
been disabled a while ago. That's why the problem showed up in tntnet.
I'm not writing this to blame anyone. I understand how much trouble it
is to work with flaky test suites (heisentests), or upstreams mingli
is currently being pursued upstream in the ticket
https://github.com/maekitalo/tntnet/issues/73.
Regards
Martin
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code o
Unfortunately, I have no idea how to implement this.
I have contacted the maintainer, but have not yet received any feedback.
Regards
Martin
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fed
On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 1:19 AM Martin Gansser wrote:
> i want to compile tntnet [2] on rawhide (f34) but this fails with this error
> message [1]:
>
> str-Test::testCompare_charp: OK
> /usr/include/c++/15/bits/stl_list.h:1650: std::__cxx11::list<_Tp,
> _Allocator>::refe
Hi,
i want to compile tntnet [2] on rawhide (f34) but this fails with this error
message [1]:
str-Test::testCompare_charp: OK
/usr/include/c++/15/bits/stl_list.h:1650: std::__cxx11::list<_Tp,
_Allocator>::reference std::__cxx11::list<_Tp, _Allocator>::front() [with _Tp =
cxxtools
Hey All,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.13
Test week is happening from 2025-02-02 to 2025-02-09. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.
As
Hey All,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.12
Test week is happening from 2024-12-01 to 2024-12-08. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.
As
Hey, folks. This is just a heads up that we're experiencing increased
levels of openQA test failures due to a few problems:
1. Various tests need to check things out from pagure.io, but lately it
is being flooded by scraper bots and frequently going unresponsive.
This causes tests to fail if
Hey All,
We’re calling on you to explore and test the new *Anaconda WebUI* in Fedora
Rawhide! The WebUI is a significant evolution of Fedora's installer,
designed to enhance user experience and modernize system installations.
The Test Week will run from 2024-11-11 through 2024-11-18. Q
Tested a bit this morning, don't have energy to test everything while sick
however, will try to have energy to test more before the test week ends
18th November if i feel better
Den mån 11 nov. 2024 kl 08:14 skrev Luna Jernberg :
> Will try to help out if i have time and energy, a bit
Linux Workstation. As a result, the Fedora
> Workstation Working Group and QA teams have organized a test week from
> Monday, Nov 11, 2024 to Monday, Nov 18, 20…
>
> Read on blog
> <https://fedoramagazine.org/test-week-contributors-for-anaconda-web-ui-installer-for-fedora-workstatio
As a follow-up to my email about orphaning python-opentelemetry and
related packages, I have discovered that python-http-server-mock is only
needed as a test dependency for python-opentelemetry-contrib, so I am
orphaning it as well.
The package is trivial, and it should require very little
Hey Folks,
As the GA date comes closer; we are trying to test the last few bits in
Fedora. Fedora
takes pride in smooth upgrades and to ensure this we host Upgrade Test
Day[0].
This time we are hosting it from 2024-10-11 through 2024-10-15. This
installment
of test day is, however, a bit special
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 09:34:06PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 08. 10. 24 21:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:19:52PM +0200, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote:
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > On the verge to speed up installability test in CI we are
On 08. 10. 24 21:19, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:19:52PM +0200, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote:
Hi folks,
On the verge to speed up installability test in CI we are proposing this
change to speed up significantly the testing:
https://github.com/fedora-ci/installability-pipeline
On Tue, Oct 08, 2024 at 12:19:52PM +0200, Miroslav Vadkerti wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> On the verge to speed up installability test in CI we are proposing this
> change to speed up significantly the testing:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-ci/installability-pipeline/pull/38
>
Hi folks,
On the verge to speed up installability test in CI we are proposing this
change to speed up significantly the testing:
https://github.com/fedora-ci/installability-pipeline/pull/38
We would like to test drive this change for Fedora CI first.
Please provide the feedback to this PR
Hey All,
During the week of Oct 7-11, the Fedora 41 CoreOS Test Week will be
happening. The test week is an opportunity for the community to test FCOS
based on Fedora 41 content before it is released as part of the `testing`
and `stable` streams.
As part of the Test Week, we'll host a virtu
On Fri, Oct 4, 2024, at 9:51 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> Problem 4: package python3-fb-re2-1.0.7-18.fc41.x86_64 from fedora
>> requires libre2.so.9()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
>> - problem with installed package python3-fb-re2-1.0.7-15.fc40.x86_64
>> -
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 11:23:34AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> On 3.09.2024 10:08, Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > You have some other issue as all those rpmfusion dep issues are bogus.
>
> Thanks for pointing it out. Sorted out rpmfusion issues.
>
> Two problems left:
>
> Problem 1: package a
On Tue, Sep 03, 2024 at 07:52:47AM +, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package ghc-foldable1-classes-compat-0.1-4.fc40.x86_64 from
> @System requires libHSarray-0.5.4.0-ghc9.4.5.so()(64bit), but none of the
> providers can be installed
Already resolved, https://bugzilla.redhat.c
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:37:04AM -, Kanitha Chim wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package cdn-utils-1.162-1.fc40eng.noarch from @System requires
> python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be installed
> Problem 2: package engproduct-cli-1.36-1.fc40eng.noarch from @System
> requires
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 01:25:35PM +0200, Cristian Le via devel wrote:
> On my system I get an exiv2/krita issue and a re2 issue:
>
> ```
> Error:
> Problem 1: problem with installed package krita-5.2.2-7.fc40.x86_64
> - package krita-5.2.2-11.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires
I have krita-5.2.
On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 11:08:58AM -, Artur Frenszek-Iwicki wrote:
> I have three machines running F40; here are the results:
>
> #1
> Error:
> Problem 1: package module-build-service-3.9.2-9.fc41.noarch from fedora
> requires python(abi) = 3.12, but none of the providers can be i
rbes.fedorapeople.org/testweek/kerneltest-6.11.1.iso (which is
F40) . The test week will benefit all reports of F40 and F39. For F41,
please install this rpm
https://jforbes.fedorapeople.org/testweek/kernel-tests-20240322-1.fc41.noarch.rpm
.
--
___
devel
cipate in the Kernel 6.11
> Test week is happening from 2024-09-29 to 2024-10-05. It's
> fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the
> test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
> results.
>
> As usual, the Fedora QA t
Hey All,
I would like to invite all of you to participate in the Kernel 6.11
Test week is happening from 2024-09-29 to 2024-10-05. It's
fairly simple, head over to the wiki [0] and read in detail about the
test week and simply run the test case mentioned in[1] and enter your
results.
As
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 41 Branched 20240927.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 41 Branched 20240924.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
At the bottom of https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/ci/tests/#_enabling it
shows:
It is possible to separate tests into multiple playbooks, each of them can
represent a test or a part of a test. Testing system will run each playbook
matching the glob tests/tests*.yml separately in a clean
ect.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Blocker_Bug_Meeting
Have a good day and see you on Monday!
[0] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria
--
Best regards / S pozdravem,
František Zatloukal
Senior Quality Engineer
Red Hat
--
___
test-announce mail
On Sun, Sep 22, 2024 at 2:43 PM Andre Robatino
wrote:
> As a list administrator for the test-announce list, I received an
> identical message to approve for that list, and when I logged into my
> dashboard and clicked on the message to see the full content, got an error
> somethin
As a list administrator for the test-announce list, I received an identical
message to approve for that list, and when I logged into my dashboard and
clicked on the message to see the full content, got an error something like
"This message has been lost", assumed the message had been
# F41 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2024-09-23
# Time: 16:00 UTC
# Location:
https://matrix.to/#/#blocker
-review:fedoraproject.org?web-instance[element.io]=chat.fedoraproject.org
Hi folks! It's time for a Fedora 41 blocker review meeting! We have 2
proposed blockers for Final.
Here is a handy l
ting - see
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_Matrix_meeting_process
Thanks folks!
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net
--
___
test-announce ma
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 41 Branched 20240915.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
sed Agenda Topics ==
1. Previous meeting follow-up
2. Fedora 41 status
3. Criteria ideas from Beta
4. Test Day / community event status
5. Open floor
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @ad...@fosstodon.org
https://www.
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora-IoT 41 RC 20240913.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
Ah alright i see, thanks for the information, installing RC 1.2 now,
been a bit too busy and sick
Den ons 11 sep. 2024 kl 18:39 skrev Adam Williamson
:
>
> On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 09:27 +0200, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> > Testing at the moment, install of
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/4
-17.03.txt
[2]
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-09-12/f41-beta-go-no-go.2024-09-12-17.03.log.txt
--
Aoife Moloney
Fedora Operations Architect
Fedora Project
Matrix: @amoloney:fedora.im
IRC: amoloney
--
___
test
--
___
test-announce mailing list -- test-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to test-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 41 Candidate Beta-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 09:27 +0200, Luna Jernberg wrote:
> Testing at the moment, install of
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/41/Fedora-41-20240910.0/compose/Workstation/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-41_Beta-1.1.iso
> worked as it should, but it was not fully updated still 29
ation_test_plan
>
> Test coverage information for the current release can be seen at:
> https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/testcase_stats/41
>
> You can see all results, find testing instructions and image download
> locations, and enter results on the Summary page:
&g
On Wed, 2024-09-11 at 03:40 +, Andre Robatino wrote:
> I'm not seeing a "Create Fedora 41 Beta Candidates" ticket at
> https://pagure.io/releng/issues - is there one?
No, in this case we just ran a compose with whatever was in the stable
tag in order to test out the
I'm not seeing a "Create Fedora 41 Beta Candidates" ticket at
https://pagure.io/releng/issues - is there one?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of C
Hey Folks,
The Fedora Linux 41 i18n test week is underway.
The wiki[0] has all the information on participating in the test week.
You can grab the choice of your image [Workstation/Silverblue/Kionite]
from this page[1]
We look forward to the results and feedback!
Thank You
[0] http
According to [the schedule][1], Fedora 41 Candidate Beta-1.1 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 41 Branched 20240910.n.0. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
ribió:
>
>
>>
> Do you want to make Fedora 41 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
time and try to run:
>
> dnf --releasever=41 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno
distro-sync
>
> This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will
reveal poten
1 - 100 of 4461 matches
Mail list logo
