On Tue, Mar 4, 2025 at 4:26 PM Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 42 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time > and try to run: > > dnf --releasever=42 --enablerepo=updates-testing --assumeno --best > distro-sync > > This command does not replace `dnf system-upgrade`, but it will reveal > potential problems. > > You may also run `dnf upgrade` before running this command. > > The `--assumeno` will just test the transaction, but does not make the > actual upgrade. > > > In case you hit dependency issues, please report it against the > appropriate package. > > Or against fedora-obsolete-packages if that package should be removed in > next Fedora. Please check existing reports against fedora-obsolete-packages > first: > > https://red.ht/2kuBDPu > > and also there is already lots of "Fails to install" (F42FailsToInstall) > reports: > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_id=2300529&bug_id_type=anddependson&bug_status=__open__&columnlist=product%2Ccomponent%2Cassigned_to%2Cbug_status%2Cshort_desc%2Cchangeddate%2Cbug_severity&list_id=13558325&order=id%2C%20&query_format=advanced > > > For convenience here is the relevant part of Fedora Guidelines on renaming > and replacing packages: > > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#renaming-or-replacing-existing-packages > > > I myself discovered one issue with workrave and kf5-kitinerary and > reported them. > > Thank you > Miroslav > -- > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > On my x86_64: Problem 1: installed package libreoffice-writer2latex-1.0.2-39.fc38.x86_64 requires osgi(javax.xml), but none of the providers can be installed - xml-commons-apis-1.4.01-47.fc41.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository - problem with installed package Problem 2: installed package icedtea-web-1.8.8-6.fc41.x86_64 requires java-17-openjdk, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package icedtea-web-1.8.8-6.fc41.x86_64 - java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.14.0.7-6.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository Problem 3: problem with installed package - installed package icedtea-web-1.8.8-6.fc41.x86_64 requires java-17-openjdk, but none of the providers can be installed - package icedtea-web-1.8.8-6.fc41.x86_64 from fedora requires java-17-openjdk, but none of the providers can be installed - installed package java-17-openjdk-1:17.0.14.0.7-6.fc41.x86_64 requires java-17-openjdk-headless(x86-64) = 1:17.0.14.0.7-6.fc41, but none of the providers can be installed - java-17-openjdk-headless-1:17.0.14.0.7-6.fc41.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository My aarch64 and ppc64le servers had no transaction issues. -- Regards, Charalampos Stratakis Senior Software Engineer Python Maintenance Team, Red Hat
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
