Licesnes for NovelWriter have been updated from
GPL-3.0-or-later AND CC-BY-SA-4.0
to
GPL-3.0-or-later AND CC-BY-SA-4.0 AND Apache-2.0 AND MIT
To account for additional icon license
Benson
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
On Thu, May 22, 2025 at 12:00:04PM -, Martin Gansser wrote:
> The second question concerns the listing of the individual files and the
> assignment of the SPDX license [2]
> in the rpm spec file.
>
> [2] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/licensecheck_spdx.
the SPDX license [2]
in the rpm spec file.
[1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/review.txt
[2] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/licensecheck_spdx.txt
[3] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/ErrorReports/speed-dreams.spec
How should the whole thing be handled?
Regards
I corrected ezstream license tag from "GPL-2.0-only AND
LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT" to "GPL-2.0-only AND ISC".
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
Hello,
I'm correcting the license of uncrustify from GPL-2.0-only to
GPL-2.0-or-later.
Michael
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Co
I corrected a license tag of perl-POE-Component-IRC-tests binary package from
"GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl" to
"(GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl) AND Beerware".
I also removed non-free IETF documents from the sources archive and binary
packages. The documents
Hello,
I recently updated Unhide in rawhide. The license tag has been updated as
follows:
GPL-3.0-or-later AND MIT
Previous tag:
GPL-3.0-only
Regards,
Robby Callicotte
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe
I corrected a license tag in perl-Cairo-GObject package from
"LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+" to "LGPL-2.1-or-later".
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
I corrected a license tag of goocanvas2 from "LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+" to
"LGPL-2.0-or-later".
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send
Hey,
from version 0.8.0 on, the license of rpmautospec (python-rpmautospec)
has changed to:
MIT AND GPL-2.0-only WITH GCC-exception-2.0 AND (MIT OR GPL-2.0-or-later WITH
GCC-exception-2.0)
The reason for this is a new wrapper for libgit2, which rpmautospec
falls back to if pygit2 isn’t present
I correct a License tag in Fedora 43 and 42 of:
icecast package from
"GPL-2.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-only AND LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD" to
"GPL-2.0-or-later AND GPL-2.0-only AND HPND AND BSD-2-Clause"
and icecast-doc package from
"GPL-2.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Callaway-
Hello,
Following the update to 6.3.1, python-ftfy has moved from MIT to Apache-2.0.
Best regards,
Robert-André
(FAS: eclipseo)
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.o
emacs-async changed license from GPL-2.0-or-later to GPL-3.0-or-later on
version 1.9.6.
I've just submitted an update to rawhide that has the new license.
--
Tulio Magno
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe se
Blender still keeps the source under GPL-2.0-or-later. The spec file updates to
several license to reflect the info from
https://www.blender.org/about/license/ with the followings:
- Apache-2.0 for Blender Cycles rendering engine
- BSD License for Open Shading Language
- Zlib License for
zpaqfranz-62.2 changed a license from:
MIT AND Apache-2.0 AND BSD-2-Clause AND Ferguson-Twofish AND Unlicense AND
Zlib AND LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain
to:
MIT AND Apache-2.0 AND BSD-2-Clause AND Ferguson-Twofish AND
(LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain OR WTFPL) AND Unlicense AND Zlib
Hi all,
The upstream project had changed the license from OpenSSL to Apache
License 2.0 [1]
I'm updating the license in rawhide to reflect the change.
Regards,
Carlos R.F.
1.
https://github.com/gost-engine/engine/commit/c7a9d2902a73bd9f65ae0145ae6f3e37537
Version 0.1.6 of python-sphinx-reredirects has been released. With
this version, the license changes from BSD-3-Clause to MIT, which
should not cause any issues.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel
tl;dr: 3.5.x moves from "MPLv2 and Boost" to "MPLv2"
I realized I had not been updating the package to upstream and this became
necessary for Fedora 42 gcc changes. In moving to 3.5.4, I found that the
license was no longer embedding any Boost code so was now MPLv2 only. T
Hi!
I did a license review of the ags package (to get rid of the
LicenseRef-* tags) and arrived at this new SPDX expression for the ags
package:
Artistic-2.0 AND LicenseRef-Fedora-UltraPermissive AND FTL AND MPEG-SSG
AND Apache-2.0 AND MIT-Khronos-old AND Zlib AND MIT AND BSD-2-Clause AND
CC0-1.0
On Tuesday, 04 March 2025 at 23:55, Christian Krause wrote:
> Hi,
>
> scummvm-2.9.0:
> - added: BSL-1.0
> - now:
> License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND
> LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND LicenseRef-Callaway-OFL and
> LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT
Hi,
scummvm-2.9.0:
- added: BSL-1.0
- now:
License: GPL-3.0-or-later AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND
LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD AND LicenseRef-Callaway-OFL and
LicenseRef-Callaway-MIT and ISC and Catharon AND Apache-2.0 AND
BSL-1.0
scummvm-tools-2.9.0
- added: BSD-2-Clause
- now:
License
Hello,
mopac has changed its license to be more permissive starting from version 23.1.0
in the hopes to attract industry contributions. The old license was
LGPL-3.0-or-later, the new license is Apache-2.0.
The new version is hitting Fedora repositories soon.
Susi
--
Susi Lehtola
Fedora
I corrected a License tag in vnc-reflector-1.2.4-41.fc42 from:
LicenseRef-Callaway-BSD
to:
BSD-3-Clause AND MIT-open-group AND SMLNJ
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel
Hello!
As part of updating SDL2_sound to 2.0.4, I reviewed the licensing of the
code and the full license is now:
Zlib AND LGPL-2.1-or-later AND ( MIT OR Unlicense ) AND
LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain
Before, it was:
Zlib AND LicenseRef-Callaway-LGPLv2+
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedora https
Hello!
As of libxmp-4.6.1, upstream removed all LGPLv2+ code and the
full license is now:
0BSD AND BSD-3-Clause AND ISC AND MIT AND LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain
It was "BSD and LGPLv2+ and MIT and Public Domain" before the automated
SPDX conversion.
Regards,
Dominik
--
Fedo
lunasvg is getting a soname bump but nothing depends on this package.
License was also changed from MIT AND FTL to just MIT
--
Jonathan Wright
AlmaLinux Foundation
Mattermost: chat <https://chat.almalinux.org/almalinux/messages/@jonathan>
--
___
Hello, after reviewing the license of python-scikit-learn it changes
from "BSD and MIT" to "BSD-3-Clause AND CC-BY-2.0 AND MIT AND
BSD-2-Clause AND PSF-2.0"
Regards
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
Hi all,
The "unicode-ident" crate has a license change in its most recent
versions, from "(MIT OR Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-DFS-2016" to "(MIT OR
Apache-2.0) AND Unicode-3.0".
The Unicode-DFS-2016 and Unicode-3.0 licenses appear to be
functionally equivalent:
h
Hi all,
clpeak 1.1.3, which has just landed in Rawhide, is changing its
license from Unlicense to Apache-2.0.
Upstream commit:
https://github.com/krrishnarraj/clpeak/commit/65e572451330b4673712dfec352842f3123a9258
Regards,
--
Fedora https://fedoraproject.org
Deep in the human unconscious is a
Hi all,
In the pre-SPDX days I marked the dataquay package as being MIT
licensed, since that seems to be the closest fit.
When updating it in Rawhide just now, I double checked the license with
the SPDX license tool, and turns out it's X11-distribute-modifications-variant
It's in o
xavierb merged a pull-request against the project:
`perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple` that you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Migrate to SPDX license
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTML-CalendarMonthSimple/pull-request/1
thanks for your feedback.
I will contact upstream.
Regards
Martin
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-U
Dne 09. 11. 24 v 7:44 odp. Martin Gansser napsal(a):
Hi,
iI have released a new version of the mediaplayer guayadeque [1] and migrated
the license to SPDX.
However, I am not sure if this is correct.
Can someone with experience have a look at the spec file ?
[1]https://src.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
iI have released a new version of the mediaplayer guayadeque [1] and migrated
the license to SPDX.
However, I am not sure if this is correct.
Can someone with experience have a look at the spec file ?
[1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/guayadeque/blob/rawhide/f/guayadeque.spec
Regards
Dne 06. 09. 24 v 10:29 dop. Petr Pisar napsal(a):
I'm not sure it was a systemic mistake or
just the two packages were special.
Very likely a bug in my quick'n'dirty script. :)
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
___
all spec files to see what can be done next.
>
I noticed at two packages that in spec files having multiple License: tag,
only the first tag was converted. I'm not sure it was a systemic mistake or
just the two packages were special.
-- Petr
signa
Dne 28. 08. 24 v 11:53 dop. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Here is the third and last batch of changes for 972 packages (perl-JSON-Create
to 0ad-data)
Done.
I am now running new check of all spec files to see what can be done next.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno,
Hey all,
As an FYI, Weston's licensing was corrected when I upgraded it to
14.0.0~rc3 (13.0.95) to "MIT and CC-BY-SA-3.0" (from the previous "BSD
and CC-BY-SA"). I expect this has no meaningful impact for anyone.
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
--
__
Dne 25. 08. 24 v 9:17 dop. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
Here is the second batch of changes for 1000 packages
(golang-github-danwakefield-fnmatch to perl-Image-Xbm)
Git committed and pushed.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
___
Dne 28. 08. 24 v 1:09 odp. Ian McInerney via devel napsal(a):
Please exclude zulucrypt. I am in the process of doing the conversion
during my update to the newest upstream version, but it is waiting on
two
things:https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/561,https
.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-batch3-maintainers.txt
> Just packages: https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-batch3.txt
Please exclude zulucrypt. I am in the process of doing the conversion during my
update to the newest upstream version, but it is waiting on two things:
https:
Dne 28. 08. 24 v 12:38 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
Please exclude pythran:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/pythran/pull-request/31
Ack. Excluded. (But still included in the files below)
Also, could you please send a plain list of packages you plan to change, so I can run it trough
fin
On 28. 08. 24 11:53, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Here is the third and last batch of changes for 972 packages (perl-JSON-Create
to 0ad-data)
https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-batch3.diff
Shorten version without the context is here:
https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-b
Here is the third and last batch of changes for 972 packages (perl-JSON-Create
to 0ad-data)
https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-batch3.diff
Shorten version without the context is here:
https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-batch3-short-diff.txt
I will appreciate a re
-* is a valid SPDX id, it is not recognized as Fedora valid license.
I.e. it is not in fedora-license-data set and it will never be there. You still need to convert it to one of accepted
identifiers.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
Dne 26. 08. 24 v 4:21 odp. Richard Fontana napsal(a):
It seems you are incorrectly converting from "Redistributable, no
modification permitted" to
"LicenseRef-Callaway-Freely-redistributable-no-modification-permitted"
instead of "LicenseRef-Callaway-Redistributable-no-modification-permitted".
I t
%package -n crystalhd-firmware
Summary: Firmware for the Broadcom Crystal HD video decoder
-License: Redistributable, no modification permitted
+# Automatically converted from old format: Redistributable, no
modification permitted - review is highly recommended.
+License:
Licens
On Mon, Aug 26, 2024 at 7:17 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Yes, the package "inchi" will end up with with LicenseRef-IUPAC-InChI-Trust
> license. But right now it is not on fedora-license-data because the wording
> of the exception is missing. So right now the license
Dne 25. 08. 24 v 5:26 odp. Fabio Valentini napsal(a):
The parsec-tool conversion looks a bit strange.
It's a Rust package, its License string should be trivially
constructible from SPDX identifiers.
It looks like it hasn't been updated in a while though, so it might
predate the
Dne 25. 08. 24 v 1:20 odp. Alexander Ploumistos napsal(a):
Hello Miroslav,
I have opened issue #430 about inchi's license
https://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data/-/issues/430 for the record
, wasn't the tag going
to be "LicenseRef-IUPAC-InChI-Trust"?
Y
sec-tool conversion looks a bit strange.
It's a Rust package, its License string should be trivially
constructible from SPDX identifiers.
It looks like it hasn't been updated in a while though, so it might
predate the switch of defaults from old to new identifiers rust2rpm
...
Fabio
--
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 4:08 PM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> As the SPDX Change slowly finishes I focused on the license that I regularly
> report as:
>
> warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please check
(snip)
I was finally able to set aside some time to look a
Hello Miroslav,
I have opened issue #430 about inchi's license, wasn't the tag going
to be "LicenseRef-IUPAC-InChI-Trust"?
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis
Here is the second batch of changes for 1000 packages
(golang-github-danwakefield-fnmatch to perl-Image-Xbm)
https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-batch2-normal-diff.txt
Shorten version without the context is here:
https://miroslav.suchy.cz/fedora/rest-of-callaway-batch2-small-diff
Hi,
liboauth2 2.0.0 has changed license from AGPL-3.0-only to Apache-2.0.
This is now reflected in Rawhide and will be reflected in F41.
--
/ Alexander Bokovoy
Sr. Principal Software Engineer
Security / Identity Management Engineering
Red Hat Limited, Finland
I incorporated the feedback I got on my email about converting all remaining packages and here is full diff of first 500
packages (a-golang-github-cyberdelia-metrics-graphite):
https://k00.fr/ywn3nz8h
Shorten version without the context is here:
https://k00.fr/x1aii7ub
I will appreciate anoth
Hi there,
python-roman changed from python to zpl-2.1
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedor
> aha
Converted manually.
> gearhead1
Ehh, I'll have to contact upstream about this.
The license.txt file is LGPLv3, but all code files have comment headers that
say "version 2.1 or later".
> mingw-SDL_ttf
Converted manually. Also, I missed when upstream switched from LGPL to Zlib.
> php-marcus
I corrected a license tag in perl-forks from:
(GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic)
to:
GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Dne 08. 08. 24 v 6:05 dop. Richard Fontana napsal(a):
Looks like you are using `License-Callaway-` when it should be
`LicenseRef-Callaway-`.
Good catch. Fixing.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
Dne 08. 08. 24 v 1:17 dop. Leigh Scott napsal(a):
cjs should be treated the same as gjs, it's the same code with renamed files,
the licences haven't been changed.
Feel free to change it. You are the maintainer of the package you know it
better. This is still the preferred way.
We have 5k of
these rules to python script and I got the following diff:
>
> https://k00.fr/wdzph06y
Looks like you are using `License-Callaway-` when it should be
`LicenseRef-Callaway-`.
Richard
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubsc
cjs should be treated the same as gjs, it's the same code with renamed files,
the licences haven't been changed.
https://github.com/linuxmint/cjs
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lis
Dne 07. 08. 24 v 11:21 odp. Leigh Scott napsal(a):
gjs
-License:MIT and (MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+)
+# modules/esm/_encoding/util.js and few
other things are MIT
+# modules/script/tweener
Why is there a difference between gjs and cjs conversion?
gjs
-License:MIT and (MPLv1.1 or GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+)
+# modules/esm/_encoding/util.js and few other
things are MIT
+# modules
> paintown
> - CC0 and Public Domain and BSD and LGPLv2+
> + CC0-1.0 AND LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain AND License-Callaway-BSD AND
> License-Callaway-LGPLv2+
> - Public Domain
> + LicenseRef-Fedora-Public-Domain
Slightly off-topic, but this package was pulled because
Dne 07. 08. 24 v 9:30 odp. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
3) I first thought that this: atril
- GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT
+ GPL-2.0-or-later AND License-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND License-Callaway-MIT
needs different handling, but then I realized it is likely what we want. It converts GPLv2+ to only
]) that all remaining packags will
be converted to License-Callaway-$OLDID [2].
There is several "licenses" that are in between. For that Richard proposed to
use this mapping:
Public domain -> LicenseRef-Callaway-Public-Domain
Freely redistributable without restrictions ->
Lic
I corrected a license tag in perl-Test-Run from
(GPL+ or Artistic) and (GPLv2+ or Artistic) and MIT
to
(GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl) AND GPL-2.0-only AND MIT
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel
I corrected a perl-Statistics-CaseResampling license from:
(GPL+ or Artistic) and (Copyright Only)
to:
(GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl) AND BSD-3-Clause
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list
. I will remove all "with exceptions" from this conversion.
Done.
I skipped licenses including "with". And I identified one more problem where
the tooling proposed:
+License: Not a valid license string in legacy syntax. Pass '--verbose'
to get full parser
Dne 30. 07. 24 v 6:40 odp. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
I am going to do the mass change of the licenses from "GPL+ or Artistic" to
"GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl"
The proposed diff is here https://k00.fr/1o80qex2
Done
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fe
Dne 31. 07. 24 v 6:57 odp. Richard Fontana napsal(a):
Oh never mind, that is not what you're doing. Still, I am concerned
about any mass replacement of Callaway "with exceptions", since that
could refer to anything, or did you handle this on a
package-by-package basis?
Good point. I will remove
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 12:52 PM Richard Fontana wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:13 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> >
> > Hi.
> >
> > This is a batch of remaining licenses that allows 1:1 conversion [*]. It
> > includes leftovers from previous migrations,
> > compound formulas and rarely used li
On Wed, Jul 31, 2024 at 5:13 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> This is a batch of remaining licenses that allows 1:1 conversion [*]. It
> includes leftovers from previous migrations,
> compound formulas and rarely used licenses.
>
> The proposed diff is here https://k00.fr/5i348p12
> Unless s
Dne 31. 07. 24 v 11:14 dop. Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please check
How to reproduce this warning?
These lines
https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt#_16
My script put it there whenever both
04:00:12.0 +0200
+++ rpm-specs/aces_container.spec 2024-07-31 10:52:00.694637327 +0200
@@ -3,10 +3,11 @@
Name: aces_container
Version: 1.0.2
-Release: 17%{?dist}
+Release: 18%{?dist}
Summary: ACES Container Reference
-License: AMPA
.spec 2024-07-31 10:52:00.694637327 +0200
@@ -3,10 +3,11 @@
Name: aces_container
Version: 1.0.2
-Release: 17%{?dist}
+Release: 18%{?dist}
Summary: ACES Container Reference
-License: AMPAS BSD
+# Automatically converted from old format: AMPAS BSD - r
-3,10 +3,11 @@
Name: aces_container
Version: 1.0.2
-Release: 17%{?dist}
+Release: 18%{?dist}
Summary: ACES Container Reference
-License: AMPAS BSD
+# Automatically converted from old format: AMPAS BSD - review is highly
recommended.
+License:
Dne 30. 07. 24 v 16:07 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
As the SPDX Change slowly finishes I focused on the license that I
regularly report as:
warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please check
How to reproduce this warning?
Vít
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Hi.
This is a batch of remaining licenses that allows 1:1 conversion [*]. It includes leftovers from previous migrations,
compound formulas and rarely used licenses.
The proposed diff is here https://k00.fr/5i348p12
Affected packages: https://k00.fr/zszrcmgr
Unless somebody stop me, I will
V Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 05:46:56PM -0400, Richard Fontana napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 1:24 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
> >
> >> perl-RPC-XML hobbes1069 jplesnik ppisar
> >
> > This one I have no idea what to do with:
> > License:(Artistic 2.0
r a markup change or it will be new
exception. Please open issuehttps://gitlab.com/fedora/legal/fedora-license-data
So at the end it will be either "Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception" or "Apache-2.0 WITH
$BrandNewException".
[1] Great tool for the matching finding is this
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 04:07:01PM GMT, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
...snip...
mxml kevin
mxml is ASL-2.0 with a linking exception for "GPLv2 or LGPLv2"
( https://github.com/michaelrsweet/mxml/blob/master/NOTICE )
Should that be:
apache-2.0 WITH GPL-Linking-Exception ?
kevin
signat
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 1:24 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
>> perl-RPC-XML hobbes1069 jplesnik ppisar
>
> This one I have no idea what to do with:
> License:(Artistic 2.0 or Artistic or LGPLv2) and (Artistic 2.0 or LGPLv2)
Just looked at this - it seemed to me that the a
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 11:22 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 30. 07. 24 v 4:40 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
>
> churchyard pypy pypy3.10 pypy3.9
>
>
> IMHO this uses a valid Callaway expression.
>
> It has UCD in it, which is not part of fedora-license-data, but it wa
Thanks! The %{shrink: …} RPM macro is not extremely widespread, but I know
there are other packages, especially but not exclusively Rust-based packages,
that use it to break long license expressions. I’m not able to investigate
right now, but I suspect you may be pleasantly surprised to find
me. Thanks!
Ouch. My tooling things that second license in the spec is: {shrink:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-oxipng/blob/rawhide/f/rust-oxipng.spec#_33
I see it is already in SPDX. I put your package on ignore list.
Sorry for this false positive.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat
Dne 30. 07. 24 v 7:23 odp. Richard Shaw napsal(a):
Per upstream opencascade is "GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) version 2.1
with additional exception"
https://dev.opencascade.org/resources/licensing
Does that translate to "LGPL-2.1-only with additional exception"?
, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> As the SPDX Change slowly finishes I focused on the license that I
> regularly report as:
>
> warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please check
>
> These are license tags that are hard to automatically parse. It include
> texts like "
Miroslav Suchý writes:
> The "BSD" is the problematic part. You should find which BSD it is. Usually
> BSD-2-Clause or BSD-3-Clause.
I see... I'm proposing a fix here:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libcxx/pull-request/51
Thanks!
--
Tulio Magno
--
___
On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 9:08 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> As the SPDX Change slowly finishes I focused on the license that I
> regularly report as:
>
> warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please check
>
> These are license tags that are hard to automatically
Hi.
I am going to do the mass change of the licenses from "GPL+ or Artistic" to
"GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl"
The proposed diff is here https://k00.fr/1o80qex2
Affected packages:
https://k00.fr/fsag6bev
Unless somebody stop me, I will do this change directly in dist-git after a
we
Dne 30. 07. 24 v 5:05 odp. Tulio Magno Quites Machado Filho napsal(a):
Miroslav Suchý writes:
libcxx nikic sergesanspaille spot tstellar tuliom
I believe this project got listed by mistake.
Its current license is: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception OR MIT OR NCSA
Isn't t
Dne 30. 07. 24 v 4:40 odp. Miro Hrončok napsal(a):
churchyard pypy pypy3.10 pypy3.9
IMHO this uses a valid Callaway expression.
It has UCD in it, which is not part of fedora-license-data, but it was listed
in the old wiki:
There is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD
And it is
Miroslav Suchý writes:
> libcxx nikic sergesanspaille spot tstellar tuliom
I believe this project got listed by mistake.
Its current license is: Apache-2.0 WITH LLVM-exception OR MIT OR NCSA
Isn't this a valid SPDX expression?
--
Tul
On 30. 07. 24 16:07, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
churchyard pypy pypy3.10 pypy3.9
IMHO this uses a valid Callaway expression.
It has UCD in it, which is not part of fedora-license-data, but it was listed
in the old wiki:
There is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:UCD
And it is listed in
As the SPDX Change slowly finishes I focused on the license that I regularly
report as:
warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please check
These are license tags that are hard to automatically parse. It include texts like "GPLv1 AND/OR GPLv2", free form
desc
Dne 18. 06. 24 v 11:00 dop. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
I am going to do the mass change of the license from GPLv3 to GPL-3.0-only
Done.
Diff is
https://k00.fr/d8fma5zp
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
Dne 18. 06. 24 v 6:46 odp. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
I am going to do the mass change of the license from GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only
Done.
The diff is here https://k00.fr/c1vnf850
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
1 - 100 of 1035 matches
Mail list logo
