Dne 07. 08. 24 v 9:30 odp. Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
3) I first thought that this: atril
- GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+ and MIT
+ GPL-2.0-or-later AND License-Callaway-LGPLv2+ AND License-Callaway-MIT
needs different handling, but then I realized it is likely what we want. It converts GPLv2+ to only possible form:
GPL-2.0-or-later.
LGPLv2+ has more options: ['LGPL-2.0-or-later', 'LGPL-2.1-or-later'], therefore the only way is to convert it to
License-Callaway-LGPLv2+.
Argh, wrong keys and I sent this email prematurely. I wanted to follow:
It converts GPLv2+ to only possible form: GPL-2.0-or-later.
LGPLv2+ has more options: ['LGPL-2.0-or-later', 'LGPL-2.1-or-later'], therefore the only way is to convert it to
License-Callaway-LGPLv2+.
But what to do with MIT. MIT is already in SPDX. But in Callaway form too. And because the whole formula contains old
Callaway ids, we can assume the MIT is old Callaway "MIT". And that can be converted to:
['Adobe-Glyph', 'BSL-1.0', 'Boehm-GC', 'HP-1986', 'HPND-sell-variant'
, 'HPND', 'ICU', 'MIT-CMU', 'MIT-Festival', 'MIT-Modern-Variant', 'MIT-enna', 'MIT-feh', 'MIT-open-group', 'MIT', 'NTP',
'SGI-B-2.0',
'SMLNJ', 'UnixCrypt', 'Xfig', 'libtiff', 'mpich2']
And we do not know what to use. So only safe option is to convert it to
License-Callaway-MIT.
If you spot any other issue in the diff, let me know.
I am leaving for holiday tomorrow, I will try to address your feedback after a
week.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
