On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 9:08 AM Miroslav Suchý <msu...@redhat.com> wrote:
> As the SPDX Change slowly finishes I focused on the license that I > regularly report as: > > warning: not valid neither as Callaway nor as SPDX, please check > > These are license tags that are hard to automatically parse. It include > texts like "GPLv1 AND/OR GPLv2", free form description of exceptions, > licenses that were not listed in old Licensing wiki etc. And sometimes just > a typo. > > If your package is listed below, I will be very glad if you check your > License tag and convert it to SPDX formula. > > The general guidance for conversion is > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/legal/update-existing-packages/ But > if you still need a guidance, then please let me know. Either here publicly > or off-list. > > Maintainers by package: > opencascade hobbes1069 > Per upstream opencascade is "GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL) version 2.1 with additional exception" https://dev.opencascade.org/resources/licensing Does that translate to "LGPL-2.1-only with additional exception"? perl-RPC-XML hobbes1069 jplesnik ppisar > This one I have no idea what to do with: License: (Artistic 2.0 or Artistic or LGPLv2) and (Artistic 2.0 or LGPLv2) Thanks, Richard
-- _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
