Typo?
s/expect/except
Thanks & Regards,
Vijayaguru
On Tuesday 24 May 2011 04:46 AM, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: stsp
Date: Mon May 23 23:16:36 2011
New Revision: 1126808
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1126808&view=rev
Log:
* subversion/svn/main.c
(svn_cl__options): Remove all lon
On Tuesday 24 May 2011 12:58 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:07:50PM +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
In svn 1.7 there is pristine storage area in the working copy, where
all present files are stored by their checksums. If I understand this
pristine storage correctly, if yo
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 06:37, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 00:10, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:02, Greg Stein wrote:
>>...
>>> The stated intent has been to try and get ra_serf in people's hands. That
>>> also means putting it into the alphas.
>>>
>>> You've o
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 13:56 +0200, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>
> Update: a 1.6.17 is still imminent, but we're working on a few last
> things we'd like to get into the release. I hope to roll Real Soon
> Now.
Hyrum, can you please keep us posted about tentative date you planning
to roll the tar bal
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:02, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>> On May 23, 2011 10:21 PM, "Ivan Zhakov" wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:44, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>>...
>>> >
>>> > I think they should stay in 1.7.0 until such point that we m
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:37, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 00:10, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:02, Greg Stein wrote:
>>...
>>> The stated intent has been to try and get ra_serf in people's hands. That
>>> also means putting it into the alphas.
>>>
>>> You've o
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 00:10, Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:02, Greg Stein wrote:
>...
>> The stated intent has been to try and get ra_serf in people's hands. That
>> also means putting it into the alphas.
>>
>> You've opened issues to track the showstoppers. If they are fixed,
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:02, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2011 10:21 PM, "Ivan Zhakov" wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:44, Mark Phippard wrote:
>>...
>> >
>> > I think they should stay in 1.7.0 until such point that we make a
>> > decision to change the defaut and branch without th
On May 23, 2011 10:21 PM, "Ivan Zhakov" wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:44, Mark Phippard wrote:
>...
> >
> > I think they should stay in 1.7.0 until such point that we make a
> > decision to change the defaut and branch without them. As long as we
> > intend for Serf to remain the default
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 01:44, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 17:03, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>>> On 05/23/2011 04:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>>...
All non-serf blockers should be fixed before we branch. IOW, we get as
>>>
On 2011-05-23 20:25, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:05 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
[...]
>> I do have a question, though, about a portion of that report:
>>
>> The good news is: after the extensive rewrite of Subversion's working
>> copy library has completed, a release
I see from
http://www.elegosoft.com/bestof-svnday2011/
that some people gave talks. I haven't seen any emails, so I may have
missed it, but if people could post their slides, that would be great.
Thanks,
Blair
On 23.05.2011 22:52, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:44:53 -0400:
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:42, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>>> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:25:16 -0400:
I'm with Branko and CMike... let's toss this.
>>> Feel free to do it.
>> Tha
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Stein [mailto:gst...@gmail.com]
> Sent: maandag 23 mei 2011 22:55
> To: dev@subversion.apache.org
> Subject: clear out insane shortnames (was: svn commit: r899499)
>
> While we're on the subject of wacky options to 'svn' ... I'd like to
> talk abouit pul
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I do not see these adding any true utility to Subversion, and only
> creating a mess of options. When we started Subversion, one of the
> goals was to have a clear command line. People were absolutely
> confused by the myriad options passed to
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 17:03, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
>> On 05/23/2011 04:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>...
>>> All non-serf blockers should be fixed before we branch. IOW, we get as
>>> close to a release candidate as possible on trunk. (and if
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 17:03, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 05/23/2011 04:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
>...
>> All non-serf blockers should be fixed before we branch. IOW, we get as
>> close to a release candidate as possible on trunk. (and if people want
>> to code new features, they should HIGHLY C
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 17:06, Stefan Sperling wrote:
>...
> I still prefer typing --ri over --reintegrate, or --ie over
> --ignore-externals. Maybe we should allow creating custom short aliases
> for such options from the client config file?
> (I know you hate config knobs, too, but I want short
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 04:55:03PM -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> While we're on the subject of wacky options to 'svn' ... I'd like to
> talk abouit pulling out all of these shortnames. These things are very
> obtuse. Seeing "--sr" in a script is going to make me scratch my head.
These aliases are mea
In Subversion 1.6.x, we have the following "short alias":
--cl
In trunk, we now have:
--sd
--enc
--soc
--nac
--dry
--ndd
--na
--ia
--ie
--rd
--ro
--cd
--cl
--kl
--sr
--ri
--sca
--ik
--iw
--idiff
--keep-locks
--keep-cl
I just look at that and think, "REALLY?!?"
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:55, G
On 05/23/2011 04:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 14:51, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:48 AM, C. Michael Pilato
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 05/23/2011 02:25 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
The outcome of the hackathon was "we'll start alpha releases in June and
While we're on the subject of wacky options to 'svn' ... I'd like to
talk abouit pulling out all of these shortnames. These things are very
obtuse. Seeing "--sr" in a script is going to make me scratch my head.
Does ANYBODY here know what --sr means, when passed to svn? And no
looking at the code
Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:44:53 -0400:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:42, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> > Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:25:16 -0400:
> >> I'm with Branko and CMike... let's toss this.
> >
> > Feel free to do it.
>
> Thanks for creating work for me. :-( ... I
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 08:39:39PM -, s...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: stsp
> Date: Mon May 23 20:39:38 2011
> New Revision: 1126731
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1126731&view=rev
> Log:
> * subversion/libsvn_wc/update_editor.c
> (window_handler): If closing the checksum stream f
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:42, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:25:16 -0400:
>> I'm with Branko and CMike... let's toss this.
>
> Feel free to do it.
Thanks for creating work for me. :-( ... I'll clear it out.
Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 16:25:16 -0400:
> I'm with Branko and CMike... let's toss this.
Feel free to do it.
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 14:51, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:48 AM, C. Michael Pilato
> wrote:
>
>> On 05/23/2011 02:25 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
>> > The outcome of the hackathon was "we'll start alpha releases in June and
>> > branch when the blockers are gone"
>>
>> Hrm...
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>...
>> > > > Log:
>> > > > Hide an easter egg from the help output.
>> > > >
>> > > > Found by: stsp
>> > > >
>> > > > * subversion/svn/main.c
>> > > > (svn_cl__options): Add --editor alias, which will be in the help
>> output.
>> > >
>> > > Th
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
> wrote:
> > 2011/5/23 Mark Phippard :
> >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
> >>> Bob Archer wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:54:59 -0400:
> I can't imagine that this would need to move the file over the
> network
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:07:50PM +0400, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
> In svn 1.7 there is pristine storage area in the working copy, where
> all present files are stored by their checksums. If I understand this
> pristine storage correctly, if you move a file remotely on the server
> (svn mv URL UR
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Konstantin Kolinko
wrote:
> 2011/5/23 Mark Phippard :
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Shahaf
>> wrote:
>>> Bob Archer wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:54:59 -0400:
I can't imagine that this would need to move the file over the network
since i
2011/5/23 Mark Phippard :
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Shahaf
> wrote:
>> Bob Archer wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:54:59 -0400:
>>> I can't imagine that this would need to move the file over the network
>>> since it all happens server side. Although, I guess when you do an
>>> upd
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> On 05/23/2011 09:09 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/18/2011 02:04 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
>
> Author: kameshj
> Date: Thu Feb 25 13:40:22 2010
> N
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:48 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> On 05/23/2011 02:25 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> > The outcome of the hackathon was "we'll start alpha releases in June and
> > branch when the blockers are gone"
>
> Hrm... that's not quite what I recall. But then, I remained somewhat
>
On 05/23/2011 02:25 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> The outcome of the hackathon was "we'll start alpha releases in June and
> branch when the blockers are gone"
Hrm... that's not quite what I recall. But then, I remained somewhat
under-rested for the duration of the trip. :-)
Our discussion of the
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 01:22:39PM +, Philip Martin wrote:
> > I don't see any of the Python tests using @Wimp. How is it used?
> >
> > @Wimp
> > @Wimp()
> >
> > TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'issues'
> >
>
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Bob Archer wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:54:59 -0400:
>> I can't imagine that this would need to move the file over the network
>> since it all happens server side. Although, I guess when you do an
>> update it might bring the file down ag
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:05 AM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> I recently saw the elego post-SvnDay write-up at:
>
> http://www.elegosoft.com/bestof-svnday2011/
>
> Cool stuff, and I'm glad to see that our gracious hosts felt that the day
> was successful. I know I was encouraged by conversations
Bob Archer wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:54:59 -0400:
> I can't imagine that this would need to move the file over the network
> since it all happens server side. Although, I guess when you do an
> update it might bring the file down again rather than doing a local
> move/rename.
update used t
I recently saw the elego post-SvnDay write-up at:
http://www.elegosoft.com/bestof-svnday2011/
Cool stuff, and I'm glad to see that our gracious hosts felt that the day
was successful. I know I was encouraged by conversations I had with recent
adopters of Subversion, as well as by the opportun
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 01:22:39PM +, Philip Martin wrote:
> I don't see any of the Python tests using @Wimp. How is it used?
>
> @Wimp
> @Wimp()
>
> TypeError: __init__() got an unexpected keyword argument 'issues'
>
> @Wimp('string')
>
> TypeError: __init__() takes at least 3 arguments (
> I keep my personal photos and videos in Subversion.
> Total repository size is currently 475 GB. There are
> some large (1-4 GB) video files. Everything seems to
> work fine.
>
> Some details: I'm still running Subversion 1.4.6 on the
> server (FSFS, CentOS 5, x86_64). Running 1.6.16
> cmdlin
On 05/23/2011 01:39 PM, Branko Čibej wrote:
> On 23.05.2011 19:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
>> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:21:50 -0400:
>>> What the hell is vi-cmd?!
>>>
>> Supposed to be an easter egg, but seems I'm the only one who likes it...
>
> Maybe we should just stop the silly
On 23.05.2011 19:34, Daniel Shahaf wrote:
> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:21:50 -0400:
>> On May 23, 2011 12:32 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>>> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:24:51 -0400:
On May 23, 2011 12:09 PM, wrote:
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Mon May 23
Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 13:21:50 -0400:
> On May 23, 2011 12:32 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
> >
> > Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:24:51 -0400:
> > > On May 23, 2011 12:09 PM, wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Author: danielsh
> > > > Date: Mon May 23 16:08:55 2011
> > > > New R
On May 23, 2011 12:32 PM, "Daniel Shahaf" wrote:
>
> Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:24:51 -0400:
> > On May 23, 2011 12:09 PM, wrote:
> > >
> > > Author: danielsh
> > > Date: Mon May 23 16:08:55 2011
> > > New Revision: 1126562
> > >
> > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=112656
On Monday, May 23, 2011, Greg Stein wrote:
>
> On May 23, 2011 11:43 AM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>>...
>> Thanks for the review. The original patch had rotted a bit, so I'm glad for
>> some extra eyes. Concerns addressed in subsequent commits.
> Three separate commits to address one basic revi
On May 23, 2011 12:48 PM, "Julian Foad" wrote:
>
> Greg Stein wrote:
> > On May 23, 2011 11:57 AM, wrote:
> > >...
> > was 40 hex digits. */
> > > - if (finfo->filetype == APR_REG && strlen(path) == 40)
> > > + if (finfo->filetype == APR_REG
> > > + && (strlen(svn_dirent_basename(abspath,
On 05/23/2011 08:48 AM, vijay wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is the follow-up to r1126441.
>
> In r1126441, Ivan reduced the no. of RA requests in
> subversion/svnsync/main.c: open_source_session() by using
> svn_ra_rev_proplist(). This patch does the same during "svnsync info" also.
>
> Attaching the pa
I keep my personal photos and videos in Subversion.
Total repository size is currently 475 GB. There are
some large (1-4 GB) video files. Everything seems to
work fine.
Some details: I'm still running Subversion 1.4.6 on the
server (FSFS, CentOS 5, x86_64). Running 1.6.16
cmdline client on Cent
Greg Stein wrote:
> On May 23, 2011 11:57 AM, wrote:
> >...
> was 40 hex digits. */
> > - if (finfo->filetype == APR_REG && strlen(path) == 40)
> > + if (finfo->filetype == APR_REG
> > + && (strlen(svn_dirent_basename(abspath, pool))
> > + ==
>
> On my phone, so I can't tell, but
Greg Stein wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:24:51 -0400:
> On May 23, 2011 12:09 PM, wrote:
> >
> > Author: danielsh
> > Date: Mon May 23 16:08:55 2011
> > New Revision: 1126562
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1126562&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Hide an easter egg from the help output.
> >
> I have not used the write-through proxy functionality before so maybe
> I botched something with my configuration? I attached my httpd.conf...
Resending. The attached conf file didn't come through to the list
(though Kamesh got it).
Paul
Index: subversion/mod_dav_svn/dav_svn.h
===
On May 23, 2011 12:09 PM, wrote:
>
> Author: danielsh
> Date: Mon May 23 16:08:55 2011
> New Revision: 1126562
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1126562&view=rev
> Log:
> Hide an easter egg from the help output.
>
> Found by: stsp
>
> * subversion/svn/main.c
> (svn_cl__options): Add --edi
On May 23, 2011 11:57 AM, wrote:
>...
was 40 hex digits. */
> - if (finfo->filetype == APR_REG && strlen(path) == 40)
> + if (finfo->filetype == APR_REG
> + && (strlen(svn_dirent_basename(abspath, pool))
> + ==
On my phone, so I can't tell, but ... can basename() take NULL for the
On May 23, 2011 11:43 AM, "Hyrum K Wright" wrote:
>...
> Thanks for the review. The original patch had rotted a bit, so I'm glad
for some extra eyes. Concerns addressed in subsequent commits.
Three separate commits to address one basic review? ... you trying to get
your stats up?
:-P
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:53 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> On 05/23/2011 09:09 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 05/18/2011 02:04 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
>
> Author: kameshj
> Date: Thu Feb 25 13:40:22 2010
> N
On 05/23/2011 09:09 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
On 05/18/2011 02:04 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
Author: kameshj
Date: Thu Feb 25 13:40:22 2010
New Revision: 916286
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916286&view=rev
Log:
With the below apache
Greg Stein wrote:
> On May 23, 2011 8:10 AM, "Julian Foad" wrote:
> >...
> > > > + /* The old pristine file name was 40 hex digits. */
> > > > + if (finfo->filetype == APR_REG && strlen(path) == 40)
> > >
> > > Because you have abspath values, this strlen() condition can never be
> true.
> >
> >
On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 15:55 +0200, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 3:43 PM, Julian Foad wrote:
> > C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> >> On 05/18/2011 02:02 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> >> > On 05/18/2011 01:34 PM, C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> >> >> You mentioned not being able to provide
On 05/23/2011 09:09 PM, Paul Burba wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
On 05/18/2011 02:04 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
Author: kameshj
Date: Thu Feb 25 13:40:22 2010
New Revision: 916286
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916286&view=rev
Log:
With the below apache
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:15 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:00, wrote:
> >...
> > +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c Mon May 23
> 15:00:50 2011
> > @@ -141,36 +141,22 @@ path_driver_cb_func(void **dir_baton,
> > return editor->delete_entry(path, SVN_INV
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
> On 05/18/2011 02:04 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
>>>
>>> Author: kameshj
>>> Date: Thu Feb 25 13:40:22 2010
>>> New Revision: 916286
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916286&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> With the below apache configuratio
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:00, wrote:
>...
> +++ subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/delete.c Mon May 23 15:00:50
> 2011
> @@ -141,36 +141,22 @@ path_driver_cb_func(void **dir_baton,
> return editor->delete_entry(path, SVN_INVALID_REVNUM, parent_baton, pool);
> }
>
> -
> static svn_err
On 05/18/2011 02:04 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
Author: kameshj
Date: Thu Feb 25 13:40:22 2010
New Revision: 916286
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=916286&view=rev
Log:
With the below apache configuration(See the trailing slash at the end
of '/svn/').
DAV svn
SVNParentPath /repositories
#S
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Paul Burba wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>> I've been assuming the syntax is frozen for a long time now, so yeah...
>> freeze it more :-)
>> On May 23, 2011 8:12 AM, "Stefan Sperling" wrote:
>>> The recent fix for issue #3895 ("repos
Stefan Sperling wrote on Mon, May 23, 2011 at 14:11:44 +0200:
> We can always add a new property (e.g. svn:mergeinfo2) if we want
> to add information or use a new syntax.
Err... not easily.
The filesystem layer has certain optimizations for efficiently finding
paths with svn:mergeinfo set on the
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> I've been assuming the syntax is frozen for a long time now, so yeah...
> freeze it more :-)
> On May 23, 2011 8:12 AM, "Stefan Sperling" wrote:
>> The recent fix for issue #3895 ("repos layer does not verify mergeinfo
>> syntax") implies that
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:29, Hyrum K Wright wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:11, wrote:
>> > Author: hwright
>> > Date: Mon May 23 13:11:10 2011
>> > New Revision: 1126481
>> >
>> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1126481&view=
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:11, wrote:
> > Author: hwright
> > Date: Mon May 23 13:11:10 2011
> > New Revision: 1126481
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1126481&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Remove some integer size mismatch warnings by u
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:11, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Mon May 23 13:11:10 2011
> New Revision: 1126481
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1126481&view=rev
> Log:
> Remove some integer size mismatch warnings by using size_t in places where
> we calculate pointer differences.
Stri
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:02, wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Mon May 23 13:02:45 2011
> New Revision: 1126480
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1126480&view=rev
> Log:
> Apply the propname filter to depth == empty when doing a recursive proplist.
Is there a way to add a regression tes
Hi,
This is the follow-up to r1126441.
In r1126441, Ivan reduced the no. of RA requests in
subversion/svnsync/main.c: open_source_session() by using
svn_ra_rev_proplist(). This patch does the same during "svnsync info" also.
Attaching the patch and log message.
Thanks & Regards,
Vijayaguru
On May 23, 2011 8:10 AM, "Julian Foad" wrote:
>...
> > > + /* The old pristine file name was 40 hex digits. */
> > > + if (finfo->filetype == APR_REG && strlen(path) == 40)
> >
> > Because you have abspath values, this strlen() condition can never be
true.
>
> ... I added this line, and aargh, y
I've been assuming the syntax is frozen for a long time now, so yeah...
freeze it more :-)
On May 23, 2011 8:12 AM, "Stefan Sperling" wrote:
> The recent fix for issue #3895 ("repos layer does not verify mergeinfo
> syntax") implies that the syntax of svn:mergeinfo is frozen and cannot
> be change
The recent fix for issue #3895 ("repos layer does not verify mergeinfo
syntax") implies that the syntax of svn:mergeinfo is frozen and cannot
be changed in future release without breaking compatibility of newer
clients with 1.7 servers.
We also backported this change to 1.6.17.
I am pointing this
On Sun, 2011-05-22 at 09:30 -0400, Greg Stein wrote:
> On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 12:38, wrote:
> > Author: julianfoad
> > Date: Fri May 20 16:38:24 2011
> > New Revision: 1125455
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1125455&view=rev
> > Log:
> > Prepare to give pristine text files a filena
On 05/23/2011 02:28 PM, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
On Monday 23 May 2011 02:02 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +0530, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
Hi all,
I have attached my recent patch along with this mail. Please
share your views.
Can you provide a log m
On 05/23/2011 04:46 PM, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
Hi all,
The "--config-option" parameter is never used with "svnadmin". It
is newly introduced in the trunk code.
There is no use-case (as far as I know) to use the "--config-option"
with svnadmin. So as discussed with
Stefan Sperling via
On Fri, 2011-05-20, Winston Smith wrote:
> Sorry if this is the wrong list, but I'm curious about one thing:
> Are the SVN developers aware of any quirks in SVN in regards
> to storing a large number (say, 1000) very large binary files
> (say, 1GB each)? So, the entire repository would be 1TB of si
Hi all,
The "--config-option" parameter is never used with "svnadmin". It
is newly introduced in the trunk code.
There is no use-case (as far as I know) to use the "--config-option"
with svnadmin. So as discussed with
Stefan Sperling via the IRC, I removed the --config-option for svnadmin
On 05/23/2011 02:28 PM, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
On Monday 23 May 2011 02:02 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +0530, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
Hi all,
I have attached my recent patch along with this mail. Please
share your views.
Can you provide a log m
On Monday 23 May 2011 02:02 PM, Stefan Sperling wrote:
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +0530, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
Hi all,
I have attached my recent patch along with this mail. Please
share your views.
Can you provide a log message, too?
Sure Stefan :)
Attaching the log mes
>> Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 05:26:51 -0700
>> From: Bert Huijben
>> To: "phi...@apache.org" ,
>> "comm...@subversion.apache.org"
>> Subject: RE: svn commit: r1125313 -
>> /subversion/trunk/subversion/libsvn_client/externals.c
>> Reply-To: dev@subversion.apache.org
>> Message-ID: <-38519172295
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 01:08:28PM +0530, Prabhu Gnana Sundar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have attached my recent patch along with this mail. Please
> share your views.
>
>
Can you provide a log message, too?
> Index: subversion/svnadmin/main.c
> ===
Hi all,
I have attached my recent patch along with this mail. Please share
your views.
Thanks and regards
Prabhu
On Saturday 21 May 2011 09:39 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 11:12 AM, Kamesh Jayachandran wrote:
On 05/20/2011 10:28 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
Log messa
86 matches
Mail list logo
