On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 17:03, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net> wrote: >> On 05/23/2011 04:27 PM, Greg Stein wrote: >>... >>> All non-serf blockers should be fixed before we branch. IOW, we get as >>> close to a release candidate as possible on trunk. (and if people want >>> to code new features, they should HIGHLY CONSIDER doing that on a >>> branch, for later reintegration). >> >> Should we, then, move the Serf issues to 1.7-consider in the tracker? > > If you like churning issues... sure. > > I'd kind of like them front-and-center for 1.7.0 queries. But whatevs...
I think they should stay in 1.7.0 until such point that we make a decision to change the defaut and branch without them. As long as we intend for Serf to remain the default, and as I understand it that is the intent, we should keep these items in 1.7.0. -- Thanks Mark Phippard http://markphip.blogspot.com/
