On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:37, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 00:10, Ivan Zhakov <i...@visualsvn.com> wrote: >> On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 08:02, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >>... >>> The stated intent has been to try and get ra_serf in people's hands. That >>> also means putting it into the alphas. >>> >>> You've opened issues to track the showstoppers. If they are fixed, then >>> we're good. >>> >> Is it makes sense to release ra_serf in alphas if there are known >> showstopper bugs? > > I've been using ra_serf for 2.5 years. I have had zero productivity > problems. I see no reason to assume that people will have problems > with any release based on ra_serf. You have identified some edge cases > which we need to fix, but I don't see it as a blocker for an alpha. > Subversion source code tree is relatively small comparing to used by many Subversion users. You can just try to checkout subversion/branches folder and see memory exhaustion. Anyway I'm fine to release ra_serf in alpha even just to prove my point of view :)
-- Ivan Zhakov
