On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 11:48 AM, C. Michael Pilato <cmpil...@collab.net>wrote:
> On 05/23/2011 02:25 PM, Hyrum K Wright wrote: > > The outcome of the hackathon was "we'll start alpha releases in June and > > branch when the blockers are gone" > > Hrm... that's not quite what I recall. But then, I remained somewhat > under-rested for the duration of the trip. :-) > > Our discussion of the default ra-dav implementation for 1.7.0 implied that > there could be open "blocker" issues even after we branch. (Because if any > of those blockers were serf-ish, that was our signal to restore ra_neon as > the default.) I hate to fuss over such fine details, but I believe we owe > it to ourselves to be clear on this general matter of branching. My recollection is that we essentially said that if there are blocking ra_serf issues when all the other blockers are gone, we'd flip back to ra_neon for the release. (So in a sense, the ra_serf blockers aren't really blockers at all.) -Hyrum
