On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:29, Hyrum K Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org> wrote: > On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Greg Stein <gst...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 09:11, <hwri...@apache.org> wrote: >> > Author: hwright >> > Date: Mon May 23 13:11:10 2011 >> > New Revision: 1126481 >> > >> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1126481&view=rev >> > Log: >> > Remove some integer size mismatch warnings by using size_t in places >> > where >> > we calculate pointer differences. >> >> Strictly speaking, it is best to use apr_size_t for those old >> platforms where size_t is not available. >> >> That said, I doubt we're running on them nowadays... > > This came up in IRC just now, and we did the following on the 1.6.x branch: > $ find . -name '*.c' | xargs grep -w 'size_t' | wc -l > 219 > $ > It appears we've been releasing code with size_t for quite some time, and we > haven't heard any complains, so I think we're safe. :)
"Strictly speaking" :-) (and its also why pocore doesn't go down that nonsense road...) Cheers, -g
