Re: FOSDEM 24

Hi Michael, Am 31.01.24 um 07:52 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: Hello, Mechtilde and I plan to be there on Saturday (only). Have fun! ;-) Unfortunately I have canceled all travel plans at the moment... Regards,    Matthias Regards Michael Am 14.01.24 um 12:12 schrieb Matthias Seidel: H

Re: FOSDEM 24

Hello, Mechtilde and I plan to be there on Saturday (only). Regards Michael Am 14.01.24 um 12:12 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi All, Does anyone plan to go to FOSDEM [1] in Brussels this year? I am still undecided, but it is always nice to meet persons in real life! Regards,    Matthias [1]

Re: FOSDEM 2021 Apache OpenOffice devroom (online)

Hello, For the second day, I propose to arrange an opportunity to invite people to a conversation as at a booth. We can use the video conference room as we did for the anniversary. Regards Mechtilde Am 28.11.20 um 22:43 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Good news: FOSDEM organizers decided to alloca

Re: FOSDEM 2021 Apache OpenOffice devroom (online)

Hi Andrea, That's great news! Matthias Am 28.11.20 um 22:43 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Good news: FOSDEM organizers decided to allocate an entire day for > Apache OpenOffice next year. > > https://fosdem.org/2021/schedule/tracks/ > > It is now tentatively scheduled for February 6th, online, free

Re: FOSDEM

On 30/01/2020 Matthias Seidel wrote: Tomorrow afternoon I will be in Brussels. Hope to see a lot of you at FOSDEM, but maybe also for a beer and talk in the evening? I can be reached via Slack... I had replied to this but I'm not sure it was delivered to the list. I am already in Brussels, I'v

Re: FOSDEM

Hello I will be there also this evening Kind regards Am 31.01.20 um 00:19 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Okay, +1 > > > Am 30.01.20 um 22:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi all! >> >> Tomorrow afternoon I will be in Brussels. >> >> Hope to see a lot of you at FOSDEM, but maybe also for a beer and talk

Re: FOSDEM

Hello I will be there also this evening Kind regards Am 31.01.20 um 00:19 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Okay, +1 > > > Am 30.01.20 um 22:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Hi all! >> >> Tomorrow afternoon I will be in Brussels. >> >> Hope to see a lot of you at FOSDEM, but maybe also for a beer and talk

Re: FOSDEM

Okay, +1 Am 30.01.20 um 22:13 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Hi all! Tomorrow afternoon I will be in Brussels. Hope to see a lot of you at FOSDEM, but maybe also for a beer and talk in the evening? I can be reached via Slack... Regards,    Matthias ---

Re: FOSDEM 2020

+1 On 28.11.19 15:43, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 26.11.19 um 14:46 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> Fine for me. > Sunday 10:00 - 12:00? >> Am 26. November 2019 12:17:41 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel >> : >>> Hi Andrea, >>> >>> Am 26.11.19 um 00:51 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: On 24/11/2019 Matthias Sei

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Am 26.11.19 um 14:46 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Fine for me. Sunday 10:00 - 12:00? > > Am 26. November 2019 12:17:41 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel > : >> Hi Andrea, >> >> Am 26.11.19 um 00:51 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>> On 24/11/2019 Matthias Seidel wrote: The timeslot is not clear now because P

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Fine for me. Am 26. November 2019 12:17:41 MEZ schrieb Matthias Seidel : >Hi Andrea, > >Am 26.11.19 um 00:51 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >> On 24/11/2019 Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> The timeslot is not clear now because Peter wants to join and he >also >>> wants to hold a talk at "Open Document Edit

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Hi Andrea, Am 26.11.19 um 00:51 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 24/11/2019 Matthias Seidel wrote: >> The timeslot is not clear now because Peter wants to join and he also >> wants to hold a talk at "Open Document Editors" DevRoom. > > I plan to be at FOSDEM too, as usual (well, except 2019 when weat

Re: FOSDEM 2020

On 24/11/2019 Matthias Seidel wrote: The timeslot is not clear now because Peter wants to join and he also wants to hold a talk at "Open Document Editors" DevRoom. I plan to be at FOSDEM too, as usual (well, except 2019 when weather conditions made me impossible for me to get to Brussels). But

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Hi Sharan, Am 24.11.19 um 16:54 schrieb sharanf: > Hi Matthias > > It's great to hear that you will organise a team for booth. I will add > AOO to the booth list so please add at least one timeslot as I'd > really like to ensure that AOO get some time on the booth. The timeslot is not clear now b

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Hi Matthias It's great to hear that you will organise a team for booth. I will add AOO to the booth list so please add at least one timeslot as I'd really like to ensure that AOO get some time on the booth. You are right and It's true that in the past we had a combined booth at FOSDEM, and i

Re: FOSDEM 2020

I see. thanks the hint. On 24.11.19 15:19, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Am 24.11.19 um 15:16 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> not sure yet. I am also proposing a talk, which needs some fine tuning. > Don't forget to update the cWiki... ;-) >> >> >> On 24.11.19 15:14, Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Hi Peter, >>> >

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Am 24.11.19 um 15:16 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > not sure yet. I am also proposing a talk, which needs some fine tuning. Don't forget to update the cWiki... ;-) > > > > On 24.11.19 15:14, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Peter, >> >> Preferences for the day/time slot? >> >> Matthias >> >> Am 24.11.19 um 15

Re: FOSDEM 2020

not sure yet. I am also proposing a talk, which needs some fine tuning. On 24.11.19 15:14, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Preferences for the day/time slot? > > Matthias > > Am 24.11.19 um 15:06 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> count me in for the team. >> >> On 23.11.19 18:56, Matthias Seidel w

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Hi Peter, Preferences for the day/time slot? Matthias Am 24.11.19 um 15:06 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > count me in for the team. > > On 23.11.19 18:56, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> Hi Sharan, >> >> Thanks! We will try to organize a team for AOO. Count me in, but I hope >> for others joining. >> >> One

Re: FOSDEM 2020

count me in for the team. On 23.11.19 18:56, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Sharan, > > Thanks! We will try to organize a team for AOO. Count me in, but I hope > for others joining. > > One (not very important) notice: > I don't know about 2016, but my first FOSDEM was in 2017. And in 2017 > you had

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Hello DAve Am 22.11.19 um 19:09 schrieb Dave Fisher: > Hi - > > > Was the request for OpenOffice or Apache OpenOffice? Naturally for Apache OpenOffice > > Regards, > Dave Kind regards -- Mechtilde Stehmann ## Apache OpenOffice ## Freie Office Suite für Linux, MacOSX, Windows ## Debian Dev

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Hi Sharan, Thanks! We will try to organize a team for AOO. Count me in, but I hope for others joining. One (not very important) notice: I don't know about 2016, but my first FOSDEM was in 2017. And in 2017 you had a combined booth with OpenOffice. Regards,    Matthias Am 23.11.19 um 18:35 schr

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Hi All I wanted to let you know that a wiki page for FOSDEM has been setup, so if you'd like to book some time on the ASF booth to promote OpenOffice the link is below. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COMDEV/FOSDEM+2020 We are planning for slots of 3-4 hours depending on how many o

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Hi - > On Nov 22, 2019, at 6:47 AM, Dr. Michael Stehmann > wrote: > > Hello, > > following the published list > > https://fosdem.org/2020/news/2019-11-19-accepted-stands/ > > our stand request was not accepted. The Apache Software Foundation does have a stand and OpenOffice is part of

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Yea sad to hear. It would have been super fun. Let's checkout what Comdev can provide. Maybe we can develop some ideas what to do with their space? Muharhar ;) Am 22. November 2019 15:47:22 MEZ schrieb "Dr. Michael Stehmann" : >Hello, > >following the published list > > https://fosdem.org

Re: FOSDEM Dev room

Hi Andrea, "Open Document Editors" Developer room is accepted: https://fosdem.org/2020/news/2019-10-01-accepted-developer-rooms/ Beware, it is not in alphabetical order but between "G" and "H" Regards,    Matthias Am 20.09.19 um 09:28 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Peter Kovacs wrote: >> Deadline

Re: FOSDEM 2020

If it's not too late and if you don't mind, I'd like to fix grammar and semantics here: On 19.09.2019 13:33, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Small corrections inside: > > Am 17.09.19 um 09:57 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: >> Hello, >> >> we are planning to join next FOSDEM like we did in

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Am 19.09.19 um 14:21 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Am 19.09.19 um 14:17 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: Hello and thank you very much. There is only one question left: Am 19.09.19 um 13:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: Description of project(s) for publication: Apache OpenOffice is the Free and Open Pr

Re: FOSDEM Dev room

Peter Kovacs wrote: Deadline is today. I am sorry I failed to come up with a proper application fo this event. Maybe Andrea, can you enter one on the short notice? This was under control and I've already taken care of this (sorry for not notifying the list), but still thanks a lot for double-c

Re: FOSDEM 2020

I do not feel good with these claims, but I am fine to use them. On 19.09.19 14:21, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Am 19.09.19 um 14:17 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: >> Hello and thank you very much. >> >> There is only one question left: >> >> Am 19.09.19 um 13:33 schrieb Matthias Seide

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Hi Michael, Am 19.09.19 um 14:17 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: > Hello and thank you very much. > > There is only one question left: > > Am 19.09.19 um 13:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: > >>> Description of project(s) for publication: >>> >>> Apache OpenOffice is the Free and Open Productivity Suite

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Hello and thank you very much. There is only one question left: Am 19.09.19 um 13:33 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> Description of project(s) for publication: >> >> Apache OpenOffice is the Free and Open Productivity Suite to handle >> office tasks. The roots of Apache OpenOffice go back more than

Re: FOSDEM 2020

Hi Michael, Small corrections inside: Am 17.09.19 um 09:57 schrieb Dr. Michael Stehmann: > Hello, > > we are planning to join next FOSDEM like we did in the past. To get a > booth (stand) we have to write a request. The deadline for this request > will come soon. > > Among other things we have to

Re: FOSDEM

Mechtilde wrote: do you have a link to the document? There's a technical issue since of course, before writing here about my absence, I had informed the devroom contact asking to be replaced. The talk was then replaced but it looks like this made my (canceled) talk page inaccessible, so I wo

Re: FOSDEM

Hello Andrea, do you have a link to the document? Kind regards Am 02.02.19 um 09:51 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 01/02/2019 Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Am 31.01.19 um 18:27 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: I will be there, but with a limited attendance this year, only

Re: FOSDEM

Hi Andrea, Am 02.02.19 um 09:51 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 01/02/2019 Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>> Am 31.01.19 um 18:27 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: I will be there, but with a limited attendance this year, only Saturday afternoon. But I'm looking forward to seeing

Re: FOSDEM

On 01/02/2019 Andrea Pescetti wrote: Matthias Seidel wrote: Am 31.01.19 um 18:27 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: I will be there, but with a limited attendance this year, only Saturday afternoon. But I'm looking forward to seeing some of us there! I see you have a talk at 18:00: https://fosdem.org/20

Re: FOSDEM

Matthias Seidel wrote: Am 31.01.19 um 18:27 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: I will be there, but with a limited attendance this year, only Saturday afternoon. But I'm looking forward to seeing some of us there! I see you have a talk at 18:00: https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/track/open_document_editor

Re: FOSDEM

Hi Andrea, Am 31.01.19 um 18:27 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 29/01/2019 Peter Kovacs wrote: >> I will not attend at FOSDEM. To much to do, and no responsibilities lead >> to this desicion. > > I will be there, but with a limited attendance this year, only > Saturday afternoon. But I'm looking for

Re: FOSDEM

On 29/01/2019 Peter Kovacs wrote: I will not attend at FOSDEM. To much to do, and no responsibilities lead to this desicion. I will be there, but with a limited attendance this year, only Saturday afternoon. But I'm looking forward to seeing some of us there! Regards, Andrea.

Re: FOSDEM

Am 29.01.19 um 01:22 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Hello, > > Instead I try to come to Chemnitz. I hope my life is quieter by then. > We have a quota for four booth attendees there, now we are only three. So please annonce your coming early enough to get you on the list. The catering for participan

Re: FOSDEM 2019: no Open Document Editors devroom?

I have received now some feedback on Infra. A dump of Bugzilla without Attachment is still 700 MB. This are a lot of bugs. Also I had a look at my timing table, and I am not sure I can prepare the talk until FOSDEM. Also I think the UNO talk is not really fitting to Open Document Devroom, so I su

Re: FOSDEM 2019: no Open Document Editors devroom?

This is a real surprise. Full +1 on your actions Andrea. I would have been fine with just visiting. I will try to put one topic together then for FOSDEM, but 24th is a little of short notice. Also I have already planned my time different. Currently I have 2 planned projects that could modified in

Re: FOSDEM 2019: no Open Document Editors devroom?

Ok, good news. If we'll get a stand (booth) also, erverything will be fine. Regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: FOSDEM 2019: no Open Document Editors devroom?

On 13/10/2018 Andrea Pescetti wrote: https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/ The organizers confirmed that the devroom won't run in 2019, so neither OpenOffice nor similar programs will get a devroom We have a surprise: the devroom is now back in the FOSDEM schedule. Please submit your talk by 24 D

Re: FOSDEM 2019 Booth Request for OpenOffice

On 10/23/2018 4:21 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Am 17.10.18 um 07:36 schrieb Peter Kovacs: >> Hello all, >> >> I do not find my last approach. So Lets start a new run. >> >> I rewrote the argumentation to maybe now better Ideas. Please help to >> finish this. >> >> So the draft looks

Re: FOSDEM 2019 Booth Request for OpenOffice

Hi Peter, Am 17.10.18 um 07:36 schrieb Peter Kovacs: > Hello all, > > I do not find my last approach. So Lets start a new run. > > I rewrote the argumentation to maybe now better Ideas. Please help to > finish this. > > So the draft looks currently like this: After 6 days I think we can assume la

Re: FOSDEM 2019: UNO Project as an Idea for Main track or fast talk? (was: FOSDEM 2019: no Open Document Editors devroom?)

Not directly. An UNO wrapper could be written to access the ODF toolkit from other UNO languages (C++, Python, (old) Javascript, StarBasic, OLE automation). Those languages would have to run in an UNO environment though. Other approaches to interoperability do exist; UNO's advantage is good perform

Re: FOSDEM 2019: UNO Project as an Idea for Main track or fast talk? (was: FOSDEM 2019: no Open Document Editors devroom?)

Damjan - A thought - does this UNO project have any synergies with ODF Toolkit? Is it worth reaching out to Svante Schubert and the ODF Toolkit? Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 16, 2018, at 10:08 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello all > > How about the Idea we make a main track to

Re: FOSDEM 2019: no Open Document Editors devroom?

Hi Andrea, Am 13.10.2018 um 19:12 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > On 11/10/2018 Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> While I haven't received any feedback from FOSDEM organizers yet (the >> two contact addresses I had given were mine and Peter's), I am not >> seeing the Open Document Editors devroom listed at >>

Re: FOSDEM 2019: no Open Document Editors devroom?

On 11/10/2018 Andrea Pescetti wrote: While I haven't received any feedback from FOSDEM organizers yet (the two contact addresses I had given were mine and Peter's), I am not seeing the Open Document Editors devroom listed at https://fosdem.org/2019/schedule/ The organizers confirmed that the

Re: FOSDEM

Getting back to London got me access to an English-speaking pharmacist. I am much better now. It was wonderful to meet so many nice people who had just been mailing list names. Patricia > On Feb 5, 2018, at 21:30, Peter Kovacs wrote: > > Hello Patricia, > > I hope you travel to London was

Re: FOSDEM 18 - Anatomy of the OpenOffice localization process - Speaker: Andrea Pescetti

Matthias Seidel wrote: I can see the video both on the website linked above and on YouTube I refer to the entire set of videos (the entire devroom day), not this specific talk. Each video is processed individually. Regards, Andrea. -

Re: FOSDEM

Hello Patricia, I hope you travel to London was accomodating, and you are recovering. Hope to read from you sson. It was a pleasure to meet you. I hope we will meet again, then with better health and more time to talk. All the best Peter On 04.02.2018 08:25, Patricia Shanahan wrote: My c

Re: FOSDEM 18 - Anatomy of the OpenOffice localization process - Speaker: Andrea Pescetti

I think Kay asks for the Presentation. Mine are online since I added them to the talk. Arent yours made with Presi? Then they are already Online and you can just provide the link to them? All the best Peter On 05.02.2018 21:24, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Matthias Seidel: https://fosdem.org/

Re: FOSDEM 18 - Anatomy of the OpenOffice localization process - Speaker: Andrea Pescetti

Am 05.02.2018 um 21:24 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > Matthias Seidel: >> https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/ode_localization/ > > You will still need some patience... Mike Saunders, co-organizer of > the devroom and employees at The Document Foundation, is taking care > of preparing and cutting al

Re: FOSDEM 18 - Anatomy of the OpenOffice localization process - Speaker: Andrea Pescetti

Matthias Seidel: https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/event/ode_localization/ You will still need some patience... Mike Saunders, co-organizer of the devroom and employees at The Document Foundation, is taking care of preparing and cutting all videos and making them available (a lengthy job and

Re: FOSDEM 18 - Anatomy of the OpenOffice localization process - Speaker: Andrea Pescetti

Am 05.02.2018 um 19:30 schrieb Kay Schenk: > > On 02/05/2018 10:10 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: >> The first video from FOSDEM 18 is online: >> >> https://youtu.be/1-pRWHrFLQU >> >> Regards, Matthias >> >> > > Thank you. Will slides be available in the near future as well? I am not sure, the video i

Re: FOSDEM 18 - Anatomy of the OpenOffice localization process - Speaker: Andrea Pescetti

On 02/05/2018 10:10 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: The first video from FOSDEM 18 is online: https://youtu.be/1-pRWHrFLQU Regards, Matthias Thank you. Will slides be available in the near future as well? -- -- MzK "Ring out the false, ring in the true.

Re: FOSDEM

Patricia Shanahan wrote: My cough has got worse, so I am going back to London today, skipping the rest of the conference. Get well, Patricia! And thanks for the talks yesterday... I think it will take a few days before we can report it properly, but besides the all-day technical talks sessio

Re: FOSDEM

Oh dear, get well soon! It was a pleasure to meet you... Regards, Matthias Am 04.02.2018 um 08:25 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: > My cough has got worse, so I am going back to London today, skipping the rest > of the conference. > > Patricia > ---

Re: FOSDEM dinner invitation

Hi, I have been there, well but it seems I have missed you. So maybe next time. All the best Peter Am 3. Februar 2018 16:14:43 MEZ schrieb Simon Phipps : >Peter Kovacs and I are signed up. I'll be late so you are welcome to go >as >me and I'll persuade the team to let me in later! > >S. > >On 3

Re: FOSDEM dinner invitation

Peter Kovacs and I are signed up. I'll be late so you are welcome to go as me and I'll persuade the team to let me in later! S. On 3 Feb 2018 11:07, "Gavin McDonald" wrote: > This is today/tonight? > > Is anybody from OpenOffice going ? It sure would be nice. > > https://wiki.documentfoundatio

Re: FOSDEM dinner invitation

This is today/tonight? Is anybody from OpenOffice going ? It sure would be nice. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Events/2018/FOSDEM#Social_Dinner Gav… > On 23 Jan 2018, at 4:07 am, Simon Phipps wrote: > > Just a re

Re: FOSDEM in-person meeting

Hi Andrea, Am 02.02.2018 um 10:55 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > I know that several of us will be at FOSDEM in Brussels this weekend, > and I guess most will spend time at the ASF booth or at the Open > Document Editors devroom: > https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/track/open_document_editors/ > > The

Re: FOSDEM in-person meeting

+1, looking forward to the event. Am 2. Februar 2018 10:55:59 MEZ schrieb Andrea Pescetti : >I know that several of us will be at FOSDEM in Brussels this weekend, >and I guess most will spend time at the ASF booth or at the Open >Document Editors devroom: >https://fosdem.org/2018/schedule/trac

Re: FOSDEM dinner invitation

Just a reminder that everyone on this list is invited for dinner at FOSDEM as below. Cheers! On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Simon Phipps wrote: > Dear AOO developers, > > The board of directors of The Document Foundation have asked me to extend > their invitation to join the LibreOffice deve

Re: FOSDEM dinner invitation

On 12/01/2018 Simon Phipps wrote: informal dinner on the Saturday evening at FOSDEM (February 3rd, 8pm) in Brussels I'll have other commitments for the evening, thanks. Still, this is a good occasion to remind that, for the fifth year in a row, we'll have a shared devroom running for the ent

Re: FOSDEM 2018: Open Document Editors DevRoom

Note: we have received reports that the FOSDEM site is unreachable for many users today. We've thus decided to extend the deadline for an extra 48 hours. This means we will accept submissions that come until Wednesday night, European time. The website problem is confirmed but intermittent, so i

Re: FOSDEM 2018: Open Document Editors DevRoom

Reminder: 3 days left (Saturday, Sunday, Monday) for submitting your FOSDEM proposal. You just need a title and a short abstract for the moment. Submission instructions below. Regards, Andrea. Il 27/11/2017 08:42, Andrea Pescetti ha scritto: Reminder: submission deadline for proposal is in 7

Re: FOSDEM 2018: Open Document Editors DevRoom

Reminder: submission deadline for proposal is in 7 days (next Monday). Anyone attending FOSDEM is welcome to prepare a short presentation. The call is now published at https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/open-document-editors-devroom-at Regards, Andrea. On 19/11/2017 Andrea Pescetti wrote: A

Re: FOSDEM 2018: Open Document Editors DevRoom

I would like to have at least one devroom talk. I have 2 Ideas. 1) introducing new Damjans Connector. As I understand it, damjan will not be on FOSDEM. I would like to present the new interface and the architectural changes. Maybe also highlight some issues Damjan had. It would be cool if I get s

Re: FOSDEM 2018: Open Document Editors DevRoom

Andrea Pescetti wrote: Important dates: - Submission deadline: 4 Dec 2017 - FOSDEM: [3-]4 Feb 2018, Brussels, Belgium. Just to avoid confusion about dates: FOSDEM is 3-4 February 2018 and runs for the full day both days. The Open Document Editors (including OpenOffice) devroom is on Saturday

Re: FOSDEM 2018: Open Document Editors DevRoom

Hi Andrea, Am 19.11.2017 um 11:25 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: > ... > Remember that we have funding available for events, and we should > really spend it. More detailed information will come. > ... Great! I am in the process of building a new demo PC for FOSDEM. ;-) Regards, Matthias > Regards, >

Re: FOSDEM hacking

On 19/08/2016 Patricia Shanahan wrote: Maybe simplifying the Windows build process for AOO could be a FOSDEM hacking challenge? If you mean something that must happen during FOSDEM, then this might be challenging due to restricted time (the conference lasts about 36 hours), unavailability of

Re: FOSDEM 2016

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/15/2016 01:29 AM, RA Stehmann wrote: > Hello, > > you can find my report about the FOSDEM 2016 and the Apache > booth (in german language) with a picture under: > > http://blogs.fsfe.org/stehmann/?p=1703 > > Kind regards Michael > As always

Re: FOSDEM 2016 - take action by 4th of December 2015

Just for the record, the message below was sent by Roman to a number of mailing lists, but the deadline for the Open Document Editors devroom, the one co-organized by Apache OpenOffice, is still December 7th. So you are still in time, but be quick! See http://s.apache.org/rCo for the call, whic

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation - Fwd: Acknowledging your stand request (Apache OpenOffice)

FYI Regards Michael Forwarded Message Subject: Acknowledging your stand request (Apache OpenOffice) Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2015 11:36:37 +0100 (CET) From: sta...@fosdem.org To: anw...@rechtsanwalt-stehmann.de CC: sta...@fosdem.org Stand Request for FOSDEM 2016 We acknowledge that

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation

On 29/09/2015 RA Stehmann wrote: On 28.09.2015 23:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: So you think it's better not to apply (additionally) as OpenOffice? We don't have any assurance that the ASF will be granted a stand, and OpenOffice has always been granted one for years. Before your posting, I've no d

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation

SM-G900F On Oct 11, 2015 12:36 AM, "Andrea Pescetti" wrote: > On 06/10/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> I'm going to submit a proposal for an ODF Editors devroom too, similar >> to http://s.apache.org/ved (the one we sent last year). >> > > This was sent yesterday. I didn't CC the list since subm

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation

On 06/10/2015 Andrea Pescetti wrote: I'm going to submit a proposal for an ODF Editors devroom too, similar to http://s.apache.org/ved (the one we sent last year). This was sent yesterday. I didn't CC the list since submissions now happen through a web form, but content is not much different f

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation

Roman Shaposhnik wrote: just wanted to let you guys know that I've just submitted a proposal for Big Data and Data Science devroom for FOSDEM. Good! Not sure how to increase our chances of being accepted, but would love any feedback on that. Both booths/stands and devrooms are accepted (or

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation

Hi! just wanted to let you guys know that I've just submitted a proposal for Big Data and Data Science devroom for FOSDEM. ASF is the org that can make it a really successfull DEVROOM and last year the feedback was asking for something like this big time. Not sure how to increase our chances of b

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation

On 28.09.2015 23:08, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 28/09/2015 RA Stehmann wrote: >> as promised Mechtilde and I will join the Apache booth (stand) team at >> FOSDEM 2016. > > So you think it's better not to apply (additionally) as OpenOffice? We > don't have any assurance that the ASF will be grante

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation

On 28.09.2015 22:45, Guy Waterval wrote: > Hi, > > I'm intending to come to help you on the stand for french speakers. It will > be a real pleasure to meet you again. > > Regards > We also look forward to meet you again. Regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation

On 28/09/2015 RA Stehmann wrote: as promised Mechtilde and I will join the Apache booth (stand) team at FOSDEM 2016. So you think it's better not to apply (additionally) as OpenOffice? We don't have any assurance that the ASF will be granted a stand, and OpenOffice has always been granted one

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation

Hi, I'm intending to come to help you on the stand for french speakers. It will be a real pleasure to meet you again. Regards -- gw 2015-09-28 9:48 GMT+02:00 RA Stehmann : > Hello, > > as promised Mechtilde and I will join the Apache booth (stand) team at > FOSDEM 2016. > > It's a great pleasu

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation

Hello, as promised Mechtilde and I will join the Apache booth (stand) team at FOSDEM 2016. It's a great pleasure for us, that the greater Apache Community joins FOSDEM with a booth. Kind regards Michael signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation

On 26/09/2015 Kay Schenk wrote: OpenOffice has been participating in FOSDEM for quite some time. For the upcoming FOSDEM in 2016, the ASF will also be participating. Because of the new ASF "stand" participation, it has been suggested to request a set of tables -- one to accommodate the ASF as a s

[DISCUSS] Fwd: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation

t has been suggested. Of course, as in the past, we will lend whatever support we can to volunteers at FOSDEM. Please express your interest so this can be coordinated with the ASF plans for FOSDEM. Thanks. Forwarded Message Subject: Re: FOSDEM 2016 - Call for Participation Dat

Re: FOSDEM from a personal view.

On 02.02.2015 19:31, jan i wrote: > I had a talk with a couple of other non-AOO apache people, and we all > agreed to try and make an apache stand next year (with AOO of course), to > have ASF represented, and to help Stehmanns in their good work. A good example for the way Apache should go, was

Re: FOSDEM materials, shipping address

On 19.01.2015 13:43, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > RA Stehmann wrote: >> If nobody else wants to do the job, please send the marketing materials >> for FOSDEM to me > > This is being handled off-list. Materials will be delivered directly to > me in Brussels. This gives us one extra day. Margins should

Re: FOSDEM materials, shipping address

RA Stehmann wrote: If nobody else wants to do the job, please send the marketing materials for FOSDEM to me This is being handled off-list. Materials will be delivered directly to me in Brussels. This gives us one extra day. Margins should be comfortable since Michal should be able to send st

Re: FOSDEM materials, shipping address

On 18.01.2015 11:28, Michal Hri wrote: > Hi, > I need *exact* shipping address, where to send marketing materials for > FOSDEM. Thanks in advance,Michal Hriň > If nobody else wants to do the job, please send the marketing materials for FOSDEM to me: Dr.Michael Stehmann Gladbacher Str. 3 D-40764

Re: [FOSDEM-Devrooms] FOSDEM 2015 devroom proposal: Apache OpenOffice (or joint "OpenDocument Editors" devroom)

On 16/09/2014 Gerry Demaret wrote: On 09/15/2014 09:14 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: * Devroom name: Apache OpenOffice [or: joint "OpenDocument Editors" devroom] Like last year, I would like to propose to merge both under a devroom around "OpenDocument Editors". Consider this message as the acknow

Re: [FOSDEM-Devrooms] FOSDEM 2015 devroom proposal: Apache OpenOffice (or joint "OpenDocument Editors" devroom)

On 09/15/2014 09:14 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > (sent on behalf of the Apache OpenOffice PMC: http://s.apache.org/ZDs ; > CCing Italo and Thorsten since you may have received a very similar > proposal from them, but we didn't manage to coordinate in time to > respect the deadline) > > * Devroom n

Re: FOSDEM smalltalk.

Hi, On 19.01.2014 12:05, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 17/01/2014 jan i wrote: should we arrange some face to face discussions, potentially not in the dev room The good thing about face-to-face discussion at FOSDEM is that they needn't be arranged! FOSDEM takes over whole blocks of a University c

Re: FOSDEM smalltalk.

On 17/01/2014 jan i wrote: should we arrange some face to face discussions, potentially not in the dev room The good thing about face-to-face discussion at FOSDEM is that they needn't be arranged! FOSDEM takes over whole blocks of a University campus, and offers a decent, open, WiFi connectio

Re: FOSDEM 2014: Draft call for talks, funding proposal

jan i wrote: On 3 January 2014 23:31, Andrea Pescetti wrote: 2c) Not have alternate sources of funding I agree, but that needs to be more precise, otherwise "alternate sources" include my bank account. Well, it means: if someone else is paying for your travel and hotel expenses, the project

Re: FOSDEM 2014: Draft call for talks, funding proposal

On 3 January 2014 23:31, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 27/11/2013 Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote: > >> I would like to prefer to concentrate my time on the development. Thus, >> please can somebody take over responsibility here. >> > > So let's see where we are on this topic, since invitations are be

  1   2   >