Top posting
Comments added in the ticket.
Hagar
Le 13/01/2014 22:38, jan i a écrit :
On 13 January 2014 21:10, Hagar Delest wrote:
Le 13/01/2014 00:24, Andrea Pescetti a écrit :
For the record, outstanding changes are now listed at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7173
Those i
On 13 January 2014 21:10, Hagar Delest wrote:
> Le 13/01/2014 00:24, Andrea Pescetti a écrit :
>
>> For the record, outstanding changes are now listed at
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7173
>>
>> Those interested in following progress can register for JIRA and "watch"
>> that issu
Le 13/01/2014 00:24, Andrea Pescetti a écrit :
For the record, outstanding changes are now listed at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-7173
Those interested in following progress can register for JIRA and "watch" that
issue.
If anyone knows of any other change proposals that received
On 08/01/2014 jan i wrote:
Unless someone objects, fast, I will proceed with the following steps:
- prepare a plan for changes in mwiki/forums
- ask infra to adjust the karma for vm-team members, according to the
agreed roles
- implement changes
For the record, outstanding changes are now liste
Hi.
Now that the whole vm-team has replied, and there has been no -1, I assume
we can proceed.
Unless someone objects, fast, I will proceed with the following steps:
- prepare a plan for changes in mwiki/forums
- ask infra to adjust the karma for vm-team members, according to the
agreed roles
-
+1. Sorry I was overwhelmed by the mails.
On 2014/01/07 00:52, Jürgen Schmidt said:
> On 12/29/13 4:09 PM, jan i wrote:
>> top posting.
>>
>> A friendly reminder, this LAZY Consensus proposal runs until january 2nd.
>>
>> Until now, no -1 has been received.
>>
>> Andrea is the only team member th
On 12/29/13 4:09 PM, jan i wrote:
> top posting.
>
> A friendly reminder, this LAZY Consensus proposal runs until january 2nd.
>
> Until now, no -1 has been received.
>
> Andrea is the only team member that has given a +1
>
> the other team members (jsc, imacat, arist) have not expressed any op
+1
(just getting back to the list - too much holiday - not enough AOO -
also not enough snow here...)
On 12/29/2013 7:09 AM, jan i wrote:
top posting.
A friendly reminder, this LAZY Consensus proposal runs until january 2nd.
Until now, no -1 has been received.
Andrea is the only team membe
Am 01/02/2014 08:20 PM, schrieb jan i:
On 2 January 2014 20:10, Rob Weir wrote:
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:44 PM, jan i wrote:
Hi All.
We have now reached the end of the lazy consensus period.
There has been no -1, a couple of comments and a couple of +1, this means
the proposal is accepted.
jan i wrote:
Lazy consensus has already been reached, but we need to have the acceptance
of the current (or a new) vm team, since its not adviceable that I work
alone.
OK, let's give some more time to the three missing team members (arist,
imacat, jsc) to answer if they would like to be in the
On 2 January 2014 20:10, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:44 PM, jan i wrote:
> > Hi All.
> >
> > We have now reached the end of the lazy consensus period.
> >
> > There has been no -1, a couple of comments and a couple of +1, this means
> > the proposal is accepted.
> >
> > However, I
On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 1:44 PM, jan i wrote:
> Hi All.
>
> We have now reached the end of the lazy consensus period.
>
> There has been no -1, a couple of comments and a couple of +1, this means
> the proposal is accepted.
>
> However, I have to admit, I think we have a big problem.
>
> If I go ah
Am 01/02/2014 07:44 PM, schrieb jan i:
Can it really be true, that the current vm team dont want to take if I take
lead ? In that case it would be highly wrong of me to use the lazy
consensus.
Maybe a bit early to give up. Perhaps they are still a bit in the
offline mode due to year end/beginn
I cannot help you in this area of competence. However, I like your
proposal and would give you a +1.
Marcus
Am 12/29/2013 04:09 PM, schrieb jan i:
top posting.
A friendly reminder, this LAZY Consensus proposal runs until january 2nd.
Until now, no -1 has been received.
Andrea is the only
Hi All.
We have now reached the end of the lazy consensus period.
There has been no -1, a couple of comments and a couple of +1, this means
the proposal is accepted.
However, I have to admit, I think we have a big problem.
If I go ahead with the proposal (as lazy consensus suggest), and follow
top posting.
A friendly reminder, this LAZY Consensus proposal runs until january 2nd.
Until now, no -1 has been received.
Andrea is the only team member that has given a +1
the other team members (jsc, imacat, arist) have not expressed any opinion
yet.
Wish you all a happy new year.
rgds
jan
I have been following as best I can while traveling, and it is not my place to
say, but I agree
jan i wrote:
>On 28 December 2013 16:19, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
>
>> On 22/12/2013 jan i wrote:
>>
>>> based on a polite push from a good infra colleague, I have decided to
>>> present yet anot
On 28 December 2013 16:19, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 22/12/2013 jan i wrote:
>
>> based on a polite push from a good infra colleague, I have decided to
>> present yet another proposal for maintaining ooo-wiki2-vm.a.o and
>> ooo-forums.a.o
>>
>
> I agree with the proposal, so +1 from me.
>
> Th
On 22/12/2013 jan i wrote:
based on a polite push from a good infra colleague, I have decided to
present yet another proposal for maintaining ooo-wiki2-vm.a.o and
ooo-forums.a.o
I agree with the proposal, so +1 from me.
The main value it brings is that we will have a common (and lightweight)
On 25/12/2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Hagar Delest wrote:
No problem for me, the question was just about who had to update the
Cwiki. If some of us was required to do that or not.
oh yes...I had forgotten that we're still in "request" mode for this... :/
So, if you wa
Le 25/12/2013 18:46, Kay Schenk a écrit :
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Hagar Delest wrote:
Le 25/12/2013 00:36, Kay Schenk a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Hagar Delest
wrote:
Le 23/12/2013 23:58, Kay Schenk a écrit :
+1 to the proposal and thanks for the additional cl
On Wed, Dec 25, 2013 at 2:33 AM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> Le 25/12/2013 00:36, Kay Schenk a écrit :
>
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Hagar Delest
>> wrote:
>>
>> Le 23/12/2013 23:58, Kay Schenk a écrit :
>>>
>>> +1 to the proposal and thanks for the additional clarification and
>>>
thou
Le 25/12/2013 00:36, Kay Schenk a écrit :
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Hagar Delest wrote:
Le 23/12/2013 23:58, Kay Schenk a écrit :
+1 to the proposal and thanks for the additional clarification and
thoughts by Jan and Rob, and for the forum admin list by Hagar. It would be
good for us
On 25 December 2013 00:36, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Hagar Delest >wrote:
>
> > Le 23/12/2013 23:58, Kay Schenk a écrit :
> >
> > +1 to the proposal and thanks for the additional clarification and
> >> thoughts by Jan and Rob, and for the forum admin list by Hagar. It
On Tue, Dec 24, 2013 at 2:25 AM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> Le 23/12/2013 23:58, Kay Schenk a écrit :
>
> +1 to the proposal and thanks for the additional clarification and
>> thoughts by Jan and Rob, and for the forum admin list by Hagar. It would be
>> good for us to document this also.
>>
> Do you
Le 23/12/2013 23:58, Kay Schenk a écrit :
+1 to the proposal and thanks for the additional clarification and
thoughts by Jan and Rob, and for the forum admin list by Hagar. It
would be good for us to document this also.
Do you mean it has to be recorded in the confluence wiki?
Hagar
-
+1 good luck, if i can be of any help.
--
Sent from my Nokia N900
On Mon Dec 23 16:58:32 2013 Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Hagar Delest
> wrote:
>
> > Top posting,
> >
> > Hi Jan,
> >
> > This seems very good. Thanks for helping!
> > For the record, the members of the
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 1:25 AM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> Top posting,
>
> Hi Jan,
>
> This seems very good. Thanks for helping!
> For the record, the members of the administrators [forum] group are:
> - imacat (group leader)
> - Hagar Delest
> - acknak
> - andrew.rist
>
> I confirm that the forum ad
+1
--
DiGro
___
Apache OpenOffice 4.0.1 (Dutch) and scanned with Ziggo extended security
(F-Secure)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h
Le 23/12/2013 01:03, jan i a écrit :
On 23 December 2013 00:20, Rob Weir wrote:
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:27 AM, jan i wrote:
Hi
based on a polite push from a good infra colleague, I have decided to
present yet another proposal for maintaining ooo-wiki2-vm.a.o and
ooo-forums.a.o (I alread
Top posting,
Hi Jan,
This seems very good. Thanks for helping!
For the record, the members of the administrators [forum] group are:
- imacat (group leader)
- Hagar Delest
- acknak
- andrew.rist
I confirm that the forum admins already deal with:
- the user management (ban, account activation, pa
On 23 December 2013 00:20, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:27 AM, jan i wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > based on a polite push from a good infra colleague, I have decided to
> > present yet another proposal for maintaining ooo-wiki2-vm.a.o and
> > ooo-forums.a.o (I already maintain translate
On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 11:27 AM, jan i wrote:
> Hi
>
> based on a polite push from a good infra colleague, I have decided to
> present yet another proposal for maintaining ooo-wiki2-vm.a.o and
> ooo-forums.a.o (I already maintain translate-vm2.a.o since this is a shared
> service).
>
> This will
33 matches
Mail list logo
