On 11/12/2013 Jörg Schmidt wrote:
The members of the German community would like to approach you with
our wish to install a second mailing list
(dev...@openoffice.apache.org) moderated by Jörg, Raphael und Michael
(Stehmann).
List is now ready. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-71
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> > _if_ the "de" disturbs, then we must also rename the
> "users-de", _if_ "users-de" is OK, so is also "dev-de" OK ...
> this is the point.
> >
>
> I've never said anything against the "de" part.
I wanted to insinuate anything, but I had no othe
On Sun, Dec 15, 2013 at 5:39 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>
>> > You're absolutely right and I hope it will be able to
>> change that in the future, because it is a big problem for a
>> software aimed at end users.
>> >
>>
>> I was trying to make a slightly
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Sent: Sunday, December 15, 2013 1:32 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: German community needs a second mailing list for
> effective working
>
> Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > By "de-team @"
Jörg Schmidt wrote:
By "de-team @" I agree, and maybe that's for Rob OK, (for he had the
word "team" is suggested), then there would currently consensus.
I think there was a misunderstanding here. A mailing list for
discussions in German must be named XYZ-de for a certain value of XYZ.
"dev-
> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> > local-de-team@
> >
> > or
> >
> > de-team@
> >
> > (which contains _your_ word "team")
> >
> >
> > Better?
>
> "team" is really better and to put "de" at first, mix-ups are
> eleminated.
>
> +1
Fine.
By "de-team @" I agree, and maybe tha
> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> >
> >> Just make clear (e.g., here:
> >> http://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.html or ) that it
> is used to
> >> coordinate the work in German-speaking countries, then it
> >> should be fine.
> >
> > Yes, true, but how do we do that?
>
>
Am 12/15/2013 11:39 AM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Ok, that's a point. but it is a real problem?
The problem that it may sounds too similar. When you look for
the right
ML it could happen that the "-de" is overlooked and then you
get German
mails i
Am 12/15/2013 11:39 AM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
You're absolutely right and I hope it will be able to
change that in the future, because it is a big problem for a
software aimed at end users.
I was trying to make a slightly different observation.
On 15 December 2013 11:39, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
>
> > > Ok, that's a point. but it is a real problem?
> >
> > The problem that it may sounds too similar. When you look for
> > the right
> > ML it could happen that the "-de" is overlooked and the
> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> > Ok, that's a point. but it is a real problem?
>
> The problem that it may sounds too similar. When you look for
> the right
> ML it could happen that the "-de" is overlooked and then you
> get German
> mails into the international ML. Or
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> > You're absolutely right and I hope it will be able to
> change that in the future, because it is a big problem for a
> software aimed at end users.
> >
>
> I was trying to make a slightly different observation. We have the
> ASF which is a foun
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 5:56 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
>
>> > *In OOo it was possible for many years, are members of AOO
>> project less wise, to distinguish it?*
>> >
>> >>
>> >> But I've a suggestion. ;-)
>> >>
>> >> What about to name the new ML like
Am 12/13/2013 03:43 AM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
In concept, I don't have objections to this new list, but
wish it could be
named something other than "dev-de" so it doesn't get confused with
dev@openoffice.apache.org. But...I don't have any sug
> From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org]
> > *In OOo it was possible for many years, are members of AOO
> project less wise, to distinguish it?*
> >
> >>
> >> But I've a suggestion. ;-)
> >>
> >> What about to name the new ML like what its purpose should be
> >> (coordinate the project work)
Rob Weir wrote:
There is no "German
project". There is the AOO project, and there is a subset of people
interested in German language conferences, the German portion of the
website, etc. The way to limit the confusion is to give a clear
description on the webpage where we list the native langua
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
>> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
>
>> > In concept, I don't have objections to this new list, but
>> wish it could be
>> > named something other than "dev-de" so it doesn't get confused with
>> > dev@openoffice.apache.org. Bu
> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> > In concept, I don't have objections to this new list, but
> wish it could be
> > named something other than "dev-de" so it doesn't get confused with
> > dev@openoffice.apache.org. But...I don't have any suggestions.
>
> hm yes, that's a go
Am 12/12/2013 11:08 PM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jörg Schmidtwrote:
From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:10 PM
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: German community needs a second mailing list for
effective
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 12:09 AM, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> > From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:10 PM
> > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: German community needs a second mailing list for
> > effecti
> From: Andrea Pescetti [mailto:pesce...@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2013 2:10 PM
> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: German community needs a second mailing list for
> effective working
>
> jan i wrote:
> > +1 from me, my only concern is
jan i wrote:
+1 from me, my only concern is how to make sure important information is
not kept solely on dev-de (important may also be hints about how to compile
etc). I see a heavy burden on the moderators to ensure that this happens.
It depends on the focus, but from Joerg's initial descripti
> +1 from me, my only concern is how to make sure important
> information is
> not kept solely on dev-de (important may also be hints about
> how to compile
> etc). I see a heavy burden on the moderators to ensure that
> this happens.
I do not understand the problem.
By de-community is nothing
+1 from me, my only concern is how to make sure important information is
not kept solely on dev-de (important may also be hints about how to compile
etc). I see a heavy burden on the moderators to ensure that this happens.
rgds
jan I.
On 11 December 2013 10:32, Arthur Buijs wrote:
> +1
>
> Fr
+1
From the Netherlands.
Regards,
Arthur
RA Stehmann schreef op 11-12-2013 9:44:
> +1
>
> It's not only Open Rhein Ruhr, but also FOSDEM (Brussels), Chemnitzer
> Linuxtage (Chemnitz, Saxonia), FrOSCon (St.Augustin - near Bonn) and
> T-Dose (Eindhoven) we participate.
>
> Regards
> Michael (Steh
+1
It's not only Open Rhein Ruhr, but also FOSDEM (Brussels), Chemnitzer
Linuxtage (Chemnitz, Saxonia), FrOSCon (St.Augustin - near Bonn) and
T-Dose (Eindhoven) we participate.
Regards
Michael (Stehmann)
On 11.12.2013 09:22, Jörg Schmidt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The members of the German community w
Hello,
The members of the German community would like to approach you with our wish to
install a second mailing list (dev...@openoffice.apache.org) moderated by Jörg,
Raphael und Michael (Stehmann).
The purpose of this separate list would be to distinguish general user
questions from specific
27 matches
Mail list logo
