> From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
> > In concept, I don't have objections to this new list, but > wish it could be > > named something other than "dev-de" so it doesn't get confused with > > dev@openoffice.apache.org. But...I don't have any suggestions. > > hm yes, that's a good point. "dev@" and "dev-de@" are very > similar and > the differentiation is not really good visibile. Ok, that's a point. but it is a real problem? Dev-lists are for project members, I think this may very well differ between dev and dev-de. *In OOo it was possible for many years, are members of AOO project less wise, to distinguish it?* > > But I've a suggestion. ;-) > > What about to name the new ML like what its purpose should be > (coordinate the project work): > > project-de@ project-de@ would also be OK (maybe better projectwork-de@?), but is it really necessary? I think "dev" is understandable for everyone, but is "project" also, or will people ask what the difference is? In my opinion both are "dev" and "project"/"projectwork" suitable, but "project"/ "projectwork" is _not_ really better. my vote is: project-de or projectwork-de: +0.5 dev-de: +1 Greetings, Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
