Am 12/15/2013 11:39 AM, schrieb Jörg Schmidt:
From: Marcus (OOo) [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de]
Ok, that's a point. but it is a real problem?
The problem that it may sounds too similar. When you look for
the right
ML it could happen that the "-de" is overlooked and then you
get German
mails into the international ML. Or vice versa.
If this is so, but then it's not the "de" (in "dev-de@") which disturbs, but the
"dev". Or not?
If that is so, but then would be your proposal "project-de@" OK, because no one will
"project" with "dev" confused.
Just make clear (e.g., here:
http://openoffice.apache.org/native-lang.html or ) that it is used to
coordinate the work in German-speaking countries, then it
should be fine.
Yes, true, but how do we do that?
Describe what the purpose is for the new mailing list.
You mean the "dev" disturbs and Rob says the "de" disturbing. What the really
bothering you?
For me, every name OK featuring that it comes to a list is where we coordinate
the local work and this list is in German.
One small problem is the "german" should not be part of the name, because
"german" discriminates against the Swiss and Austrians.
Because Rob "project-de@" is not good, I had now proposed "local-de-team@" or "de-team@"
(using Rob's word proposal "team"), for me would be OK.
*Would "local-de-team@" or "de-team@" a suitable compromise?*
See my answer in your other mail.
Please understand that I'm just trying to consider *all* views.
Sure, thats great.
For me "local-german-project@" or "german-project@" (for example) would also possible,
but I give Rob right, there is no "German Project" and therefore we should not use these names.
Right, "project" was just a first thought of mine to show the purpose.
But there is no sepeate project inside the AOO project. So, not a good
example to agree on.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
