On 12/10/2012 1:16 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
On 12/8/12 8:36 AM, janI wrote:
On 8 December 2012 00:34, Rob Weir wrote:
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
We should introduce a disconnect here, to avoid 1 million
uses in Poland ignoring you
On 12/8/12 8:36 AM, janI wrote:
> On 8 December 2012 00:34, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti
>> wrote:
>>> On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
We should introduce a disconnect here, to avoid 1 million
uses in Poland ignoring your easily ignored caveat
On Sat, Dec 08, 2012 at 08:32:53AM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
> The real simplification would come if we could ever disentangle
> platform dependencies from language packs. Today we have a language
> pack, say, for Italian for Windows, another for Mac, another for
> 32-bit Linux, etc. Why not just one
On Dec 8, 2012, at 2:37 AM, janI wrote:
> On 8 December 2012 00:34, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti
>> wrote:
>>> On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
We should introduce a disconnect here, to avoid 1 million
uses in Poland ignoring your easily ignor
On 8 December 2012 00:34, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti
> wrote:
> > On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
> >>
> >> We should introduce a disconnect here, to avoid 1 million
> >> uses in Poland ignoring your easily ignored caveat and overwhelming
> >> the people.apac
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>> We should introduce a disconnect here, to avoid 1 million
>> uses in Poland ignoring your easily ignored caveat and overwhelming
>> the people.apache.org server.
>
>
> This specific issue has now been solv
On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
We should introduce a disconnect here, to avoid 1 million
uses in Poland ignoring your easily ignored caveat and overwhelming
the people.apache.org server.
This specific issue has now been solved by invoking policy (so, we will
be able to put builds on people.apac
On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 7:12 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:55:53PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
>> And btw, just so you can see that I'm not just making stuff up, please
>> note the ASF Releases Policy page:
>>
>> "What Is A Release?
>
> [...]
>
>> http://www.apache.org/de
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 05:55:53PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
> And btw, just so you can see that I'm not just making stuff up, please
> note the ASF Releases Policy page:
>
> "What Is A Release?
[...]
> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html
>
> Hopefully that is clearer than my unsuccessfully att
On 12/4/12 10:56 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Dec 4, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>> having all language packs built, not advertising them on our website
>>> (that said, note that the dev. snapshots hosted on people.apache.org are
>>> advertise
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 10:04 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:39:59PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> based on some earlier discussion I think we have reached more common
>>> consensus that we 1. want
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
> wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
>>> >> If we want something to be downloaded and used by the public then we
>>> >> should release it, period. We should no
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
>> >> If we want something to be downloaded and used by the public then we
>> >> should release it, period. We should not be looking for clever ways
>> >> to avoid the importan
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 4:56 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Dec 4, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
>>>
>>> having all language packs built, not advertising them on our website
>>> (that said, note that the dev. snapshots hosted on people.apache.org
On 04/12/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
On Dec 4, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
having all language packs built, not advertising them on our website
(that said, note that the dev. snapshots hosted on people.apache.org are
advertised on the main download page ;) ). And the goal is to point
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 03:00:13PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> If we want something to be downloaded and used by the public then we
> >> should release it, period. We should not be looking for clever ways
> >> to avoid the important release steps of verifying IP, producing a
> >> source package an
On Dec 4, 2012, at 2:53 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:13:49PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
>> Any opinions, concerns or feedback? Follow up discussion should take
>> place on the dev list only (the list where decisions are made).
>
> It may be a good idea
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 02:13:49PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
> Any opinions, concerns or feedback? Follow up discussion should take
> place on the dev list only (the list where decisions are made).
> >>>
> >>> It may be a good idea to build all languages, or at least those with 80%
> >>> of
On Dec 4, 2012, at 1:46 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:04:28PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
>> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:39:59PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
based on some earlier di
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:04:28PM -0500, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:39:59PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> based on some earlier discussion I think we have reached more common
> >> consensus tha
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Ariel Constenla-Haile
wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:39:59PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> based on some earlier discussion I think we have reached more common
>> consensus that we 1. want release further languages for AOO 3.4 1 and 2.
>> how we ca
On Tue, Dec 04, 2012 at 01:39:59PM +0100, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> based on some earlier discussion I think we have reached more common
> consensus that we 1. want release further languages for AOO 3.4 1 and 2.
> how we can do that.
>
> To make it more concrete I have created a new wiki pa
Hi,
based on some earlier discussion I think we have reached more common
consensus that we 1. want release further languages for AOO 3.4 1 and 2.
how we can do that.
To make it more concrete I have created a new wiki page [1] where I
would like to document the release process, the proposed releas
On 11/23/2012 8:14 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:00:54 +0100
jan iversen wrote:
Good idea, that was basically what I meant...however even microsoft, does
provide a slim setup, that then downloads the needed packages.
There is a disadvantage to that: such an installation ha
On Sun, Nov 25, 2012 at 8:45 PM, 胡其图 wrote:
> Hi there,
> I am a mongolian where living in inner mongolia, china. and I want to build a
> traditional mongolian AOO if it possible.
> and I know there have a slav mongolian AOO, but this is not similar to
> traditional mongolian.
> tell me how to a
Cancel me from the maling list
Johanne
Den 26. nov. 2012 kl. 04:51 skrev "Shenfeng Liu" :
> Welcome to join AOO!
> I suggest you can start from our New Volunteer Orientation page for how to
> do translation: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/translate.html .
> And besides the dev@openoff
On 11/26/12 10:54 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> On 23/11/2012 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> 1. Only new languages, no bugfixes, no other code changes
>> We add the new languages on top of the existing AOO34 branch, build the
>> office with the new languages and release the new languages as
>> convenience
On 23/11/2012 Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
1. Only new languages, no bugfixes, no other code changes
We add the new languages on top of the existing AOO34 branch, build the
office with the new languages and release the new languages as
convenience binary packages. We also build a new src release package
Welcome to join AOO!
I suggest you can start from our New Volunteer Orientation page for how to
do translation: http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/translate.html .
And besides the dev@openoffice.apache.org mail group, you should also
subscript to l...@openoffice.apache.org, by sending an ema
Hi there,
I am a mongolian where living in inner mongolia, china. and I want to build a
traditional mongolian AOO if it possible.
and I know there have a slav mongolian AOO, but this is not similar to
traditional mongolian.
tell me how to add about a language for traditional mongolian?
At
25, 2012 at 3:12 AM
Subject: Re: [RELEASE]: new languages for AOO 3.4.1
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
I would like to add support for Assamese language. It is widely used in the
state of Assam, India. Please guide me the steps on how to get it started.
I have a couple of willing volunteers.
On
I would like to add support for Assamese language. It is widely used in the
state of Assam, India. Please guide me the steps on how to get it started.
I have a couple of willing volunteers.
On 24 November 2012 04:51, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
> wrote:
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we all know that the number of volunteers helping with translation is
> growing and we would like to make new languages as soon as possible
> available. This is important for two reason, first to make AOO available
> in further lang
Am 11/23/2012 09:39 AM, schrieb Jürgen Schmidt:
Hi,
we all know that the number of volunteers helping with translation is
growing and we would like to make new languages as soon as possible
available. This is important for two reason, first to make AOO available
in further languages to reach mor
Am 11/23/2012 03:30 PM, schrieb jan iversen:
If it is easier, we could keep the binary, and just release language
packsa bit more uncomfortable but still an official release !
Then for these new languages the 1-click-download will not work as the
full install files are missing.
In the ol
On 11/23/12 3:47 PM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:30 AM, jan iversen wrote:
>> If it is easier, we could keep the binary, and just release language
>> packsa bit more uncomfortable but still an official release !
>>
>
> I'm just thinking ahead, to the very real possibility that
On 11/23/12 5:14 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:00:54 +0100
> jan iversen wrote:
>
>> Good idea, that was basically what I meant...however even microsoft, does
>> provide a slim setup, that then downloads the needed packages.
>
> There is a disadvantage to that: such an insta
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 17:00:54 +0100
jan iversen wrote:
> Good idea, that was basically what I meant...however even microsoft, does
> provide a slim setup, that then downloads the needed packages.
There is a disadvantage to that: such an installation has to have on-line
access at install time. T
Good idea, that was basically what I meant...however even microsoft, does
provide a slim setup, that then downloads the needed packages.
jan
On 23 November 2012 16:58, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:00:38 +0100
> jan iversen wrote:
>
> > Following your thought...
> >
> > Would
On Fri, 23 Nov 2012 16:00:38 +0100
jan iversen wrote:
> Following your thought...
>
> Would it not be an idea, if we defined the binary to be en-US always, and
> then modify the installation scripts to include the proper language pack ??
>
> Please see it as an open question, I do not know if t
Following your thought...
Would it not be an idea, if we defined the binary to be en-US always, and
then modify the installation scripts to include the proper language pack ??
Please see it as an open question, I do not know if there are other
implications. I have for some time (years) downloaded
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 9:30 AM, jan iversen wrote:
> If it is easier, we could keep the binary, and just release language
> packsa bit more uncomfortable but still an official release !
>
I'm just thinking ahead, to the very real possibility that we're
adding new languages on a continual bas
If it is easier, we could keep the binary, and just release language
packsa bit more uncomfortable but still an official release !
Jan.
On 23 November 2012 15:01, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Jürgen Schmidt
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we all know that the number of volun
On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 3:39 AM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we all know that the number of volunteers helping with translation is
> growing and we would like to make new languages as soon as possible
> available. This is important for two reason, first to make AOO available
> in further langu
Hi,
On 23.11.2012 09:39, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
Hi,
we all know that the number of volunteers helping with translation is
growing and we would like to make new languages as soon as possible
available. This is important for two reason, first to make AOO available
in further languages to reach mor
On 23 November 2012 09:39, Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we all know that the number of volunteers helping with translation is
> growing and we would like to make new languages as soon as possible
> available. This is important for two reason, first to make AOO available
> in further languages
Hi,
we all know that the number of volunteers helping with translation is
growing and we would like to make new languages as soon as possible
available. This is important for two reason, first to make AOO available
in further languages to reach more users. Second to show our volunteers
that their
47 matches
Mail list logo
