On 02.12.2013 19:24, Rob Weir wrote:
You've probably seen various social media posts, blogs, articles,
etc., purporting to compare AOO and LO via commit statistics. If you
poke a little you see that these are almost always derived from Ohloh.
You can see our numbers here:
https://www.ohloh.ne
On 12/2/13 11:45 PM, Regina Henschel wrote:
> Hi Andrea,
>
> Andrea Pescetti schrieb:
>> On 26/11/2013 Regina Henschel wrote:
>>> I have expanded the standard.soe with some arrow heads with hole. The
>>> file is attached to
>>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123758.
>>> If you like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steele, Raymond wrote:
> Herbert,
>
> Let me know if you did not get the attachment.
>
> -Original Message- From: Steele, Raymond Sent: Monday,
> December 02, 2013 3:29 PM To: 'Herbert Duerr';
> dev@openoffice.apache.org Cc: Meffe, David K Su
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Hagar Delest wrote:
> Top posting.
> Thanks for this explanation!
> It will indeed help to temper some of the claims about these numbers.
>
> Hagar
>
Indeed, thank you! Who knew?
>
>
> Le 02/12/2013 19:24, Rob Weir a écrit :
>
>
> You've probably seen various s
Hi Andrea,
Andrea Pescetti schrieb:
On 26/11/2013 Regina Henschel wrote:
I have expanded the standard.soe with some arrow heads with hole. The
file is attached to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123758.
If you like them, we can consider to use this palette as default.
I added a
Herbert,
Let me know if you did not get the attachment.
-Original Message-
From: Steele, Raymond
Sent: Monday, December 02, 2013 3:29 PM
To: 'Herbert Duerr'; dev@openoffice.apache.org
Cc: Meffe, David K
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: Re: Building comphelper
Herbert,
We are having trouble int
Herbert,
We are having trouble interpreting the boost preprocessor macros. We are
receiving the following output when compiling sal/osl/all. I've attached the
output as a pdf.
Raymond
-Original Message-
From: Herbert Duerr [mailto:h...@apache.org]
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 2:
On 26/11/2013 Regina Henschel wrote:
I have expanded the standard.soe with some arrow heads with hole. The
file is attached to https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=123758.
If you like them, we can consider to use this palette as default.
I added a screenshot to the issue for clearer co
On 2 December 2013 13:24, Rob Weir wrote:
> Of course, this is not to blame Ohloh. The fault is not in their
> service. The fault lies with those who take such numbers and do false
> comparisons. This is intellectually dishonest and I think we should
> point this out wherever we see it.
>
> Reg
Regarding notifying Canonical... I'd be happy to do so, as I'm sure
others would. Just need to get a single assignee for it. I'd be
curious to hear why they wouldn't include AOO as a trusted package, if
they did decline the offer.
louis
On 2 December 2013 13:15, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2
Am 12/02/2013 08:54 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
On 01-Dec-2013, at 19:22, Ian Lynch wrote:
We can blame Ubuntu or Canonical or we can fix it.
This is not a new thing and I've asked that we provide clear clear
instructions to naive users (like, oh, me) about how to ch
Top posting.
Thanks for this explanation!
It will indeed help to temper some of the claims about these numbers.
Hagar
Le 02/12/2013 19:24, Rob Weir a écrit :
You've probably seen various social media posts, blogs, articles,
etc., purporting to compare AOO and LO via commit statistics. If you
You've probably seen various social media posts, blogs, articles,
etc., purporting to compare AOO and LO via commit statistics. If you
poke a little you see that these are almost always derived from Ohloh.
You can see our numbers here:
https://www.ohloh.net/p/openoffice
It is important to keep
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Ian Lynch wrote:
> Has anyone offered to put AOO into the Ubuntu software centre as a trusted
> package automatically available? If not and there was no refusal to
> cooperate I don;t see how you can say Ubuntu truncates the freedom of the
> user. Anyone is free to
hello. I tried to save something and it said openoffice crashed and doc’s will
be saved. I restarted my comp b/c the windows saying start recovery, then it
is recovered push okay. I said ok and the windows keep coming up and wont
stop. I tried to delete the page I was saving and it wont let
Oliver-Rainer Wittmann has granted review:
Bug 113059: DOCX:, each comment include the text of all comments in the
imported document
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
Attachment 79966: Sample patch
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/attachment.cgi?id=79966&action=edit
--- Add
On 2 December 2013 10:14, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 02.12.2013 09:23, jan i wrote:
>
>> On 2 December 2013 09:14, Andre Fischer wrote:
>>
>> On 01.12.2013 13:40, Efi wrote:
>>>
>>> On 11/30/2013 04:54 PM, jan i wrote:
Hi.
>
>
> It seems the latest changes in logger.pm le
On 02-Dec-2013, at 02:54, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>> On 01-Dec-2013, at 19:22, Ian Lynch wrote:
>>> We can blame Ubuntu or Canonical or we can fix it.
>> This is not a new thing and I've asked that we provide clear clear
>> instructions to naive users (like, oh, me) ab
On 01/12/2013 Dhananjayan Santhanakrishnan wrote:
I wish to take up this bug and work on it. How to proceed?
https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=56998
Very good! I see that hanya, who already fixed several bugs, has just
submitted a patch or two for this one too. So I would recommend
Has anyone offered to put AOO into the Ubuntu software centre as a trusted
package automatically available? If not and there was no refusal to
cooperate I don;t see how you can say Ubuntu truncates the freedom of the
user. Anyone is free to do with Ubuntu the same things as with any other
distro, a
On 01.12.2013 20:26, Απόστολος Συρόπουλος wrote:
After reading the reply by jan I. I decided to try again with GCC.
Now, compilation proceeds with no stupid problems as before.
BTW, main/soltools/adjustvisibility/adjustvisibility.c does not
compile with g++ but it compiles with CC so this is the
On 11/30/13 11:45 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 30-Nov-2013, at 16:06, Rob Weir wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Nov 30, 2013 at 12:44 PM, Hagar Delest
>> wrote:
Le 27/11/2013 20:23, Rob Weir a écrit :
> Yesterday we reach
On 02.12.2013 09:23, jan i wrote:
On 2 December 2013 09:14, Andre Fischer wrote:
On 01.12.2013 13:40, Efi wrote:
On 11/30/2013 04:54 PM, jan i wrote:
Hi.
It seems the latest changes in logger.pm leads to a buildbreaker in
instset_native.
svn tell that this file was updated today, but I
On 2 December 2013 09:14, Andre Fischer wrote:
> On 01.12.2013 13:40, Efi wrote:
>
>>
>> On 11/30/2013 04:54 PM, jan i wrote:
>>
>>> Hi.
>>>
>>>
>>> It seems the latest changes in logger.pm leads to a buildbreaker in
>>> instset_native.
>>>
>>> svn tell that this file was updated today, but I am
On 01.12.2013 13:40, Efi wrote:
On 11/30/2013 04:54 PM, jan i wrote:
Hi.
It seems the latest changes in logger.pm leads to a buildbreaker in
instset_native.
svn tell that this file was updated today, but I am not good at perl,
at I
cannot see what the problem is.
Output from build --all:
25 matches
Mail list logo
