Re: [VOTE] Update row lineage spec ID assignment

+1 (non binding) Regards JB Le jeu. 17 avr. 2025 à 01:08, Ryan Blue a écrit : > Hi everyone, > > I’d like to start a vote to incorporate the spec changes in PR 12781 > . > > There are two main changes. First, the current language says that > upgradi

Re: [VOTE] Update row lineage spec ID assignment

+1 (non-binding) On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 7:38 AM huaxin gao wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 4:22 PM Denny Lee wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 5:14 PM Aihua Xu wrote: >> >>> + (non-binding). >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:22 AM Steven Wu wro

Re: [VOTE] Update row lineage spec ID assignment

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 4:22 PM Denny Lee wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 5:14 PM Aihua Xu wrote: > >> + (non-binding). >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:22 AM Steven Wu wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:09 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <

Re: [VOTE] Update row lineage spec ID assignment

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 5:14 PM Aihua Xu wrote: > + (non-binding). > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:22 AM Steven Wu wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:09 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11

Re: [VOTE] Update row lineage spec ID assignment

+ (non-binding). On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:22 AM Steven Wu wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:09 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:54 AM Szehon Ho >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) Seems cleaner to me. >>> >>> Than

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:36 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:22 AM Szehon Ho > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> Thanks >> Szehon >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:18 AM Daniel Weeks wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:22 AM Szehon Ho wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:18 AM Daniel Weeks wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM Russell Spitzer < >> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (Bind) >>> >>> On T

Re: [VOTE] Update row lineage spec ID assignment

+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:09 AM Amogh Jahagirdar <2am...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:54 AM Szehon Ho > wrote: > >> +1 (binding) Seems cleaner to me. >> >> Thanks >> Szehon >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:31 AM Russell Spitzer < >> russell.spit.

Re: [VOTE] Update row lineage spec ID assignment

+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 11:54 AM Szehon Ho wrote: > +1 (binding) Seems cleaner to me. > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:31 AM Russell Spitzer < > russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> +1 >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:30 PM Ryan Blue wrote: >> >>> Adding my own

Re: [VOTE] Update row lineage spec ID assignment

+1 (binding) Seems cleaner to me. Thanks Szehon On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:31 AM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:30 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> Adding my own +1. >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:19 AM Daniel Weeks wrote: >> >>> +1 (binding) >>> >>> I think this update

Re: [VOTE] Update row lineage spec ID assignment

Adding my own +1. On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:19 AM Daniel Weeks wrote: > +1 (binding) > > I think this update really helps ensure row ids will be present and > reliable for upgraded tables. Thanks Ryan! > > On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 4:09 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I’d like to st

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (binding) Thanks Szehon On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:18 AM Daniel Weeks wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM Russell Spitzer > wrote: > >> +1 (Bind) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non binding) (as said in the PR :)) >>> >>

Re: [VOTE] Update row lineage spec ID assignment

+1 On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 12:30 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Adding my own +1. > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:19 AM Daniel Weeks wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> I think this update really helps ensure row ids will be present and >> reliable for upgraded tables. Thanks Ryan! >> >> On Wed, Apr 16, 2025

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM Russell Spitzer wrote: > +1 (Bind) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré > wrote: > >> +1 (non binding) (as said in the PR :)) >> >> Thanks ! >> >> Regards >> JB >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 3:00 PM Fokko Driesprong >> wrote: >>

Re: [VOTE] Update row lineage spec ID assignment

+1 (binding) I think this update really helps ensure row ids will be present and reliable for upgraded tables. Thanks Ryan! On Wed, Apr 16, 2025 at 4:09 PM Ryan Blue wrote: > Hi everyone, > > I’d like to start a vote to incorporate the spec changes in PR 12781 >

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (non binding) (as said in the PR :)) Thanks ! Regards JB On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 3:00 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > A while ago, I sent out a DISCUSS around simplifying the encoding of the > source-id(s) in the partition-spec and sort-order in the case of a > multi-argume

Re: [VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

+1 (Bind) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote: > +1 (non binding) (as said in the PR :)) > > Thanks ! > > Regards > JB > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 3:00 PM Fokko Driesprong wrote: > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > A while ago, I sent out a DISCUSS around simplifying the encodin

Analytics Accelerator Library for Amazon S3

Hi everyone, We (Andy, Fuat, Michael and Sanjay) are from the Amazon S3 team. We recently released the Analytics Accelerator Library for Amazon S3 under the Apache 2.0 license (https://github.com/awslabs/analytics-accelerator-s3) that optimises access to S3 for Parquet data accessed by workload

[VOTE] Simplify multi-argument field-id(s) encoding

Hi everyone, A while ago, I sent out a DISCUSS around simplifying the encoding of the source-id(s) in the partition-spec and sort-order in the case of a multi-argument transform. In short, use source-id in the case of a single argu

[DISCUSS] PyIceberg 0.9.1

Hi everyone, After the 0.9.0 release, we've captured quite a few bugfixes , and it would be good to do a quick 0.9.1 patch release. I took the liberty of cherry-picking the fixes