+1 (binding)

On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1 (Bind)
>
> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non binding) (as said in the PR :))
>>
>> Thanks !
>>
>> Regards
>> JB
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 3:00 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi everyone,
>> >
>> > A while ago, I sent out a DISCUSS around simplifying the encoding of
>> the source-id(s) in the partition-spec and sort-order in the case of a
>> multi-argument transform. In short, use source-id in the case of a single
>> argument transform, and use source-ids in the case of multi-argument
>> transforms. We've had some good discussions on the PR (thanks for jumping
>> in, everyone!), and I feel there is consensus. Therefore, I would like to
>> raise this vote to verify this across the mailing list. This vote will
>> remain open for at least 72 hours.
>> >
>> > Please consider this my +1
>> >
>> > Kind regards,
>> > Fokko
>>
>

Reply via email to