+1 (binding) On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:22 AM Szehon Ho <szehon.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding) > > Thanks > Szehon > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:18 AM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: > >> +1 (binding) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM Russell Spitzer < >> russell.spit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> +1 (Bind) >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> +1 (non binding) (as said in the PR :)) >>>> >>>> Thanks ! >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> JB >>>> >>>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 3:00 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >>>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Hi everyone, >>>> > >>>> > A while ago, I sent out a DISCUSS around simplifying the encoding of >>>> the source-id(s) in the partition-spec and sort-order in the case of a >>>> multi-argument transform. In short, use source-id in the case of a single >>>> argument transform, and use source-ids in the case of multi-argument >>>> transforms. We've had some good discussions on the PR (thanks for jumping >>>> in, everyone!), and I feel there is consensus. Therefore, I would like to >>>> raise this vote to verify this across the mailing list. This vote will >>>> remain open for at least 72 hours. >>>> > >>>> > Please consider this my +1 >>>> > >>>> > Kind regards, >>>> > Fokko >>>> >>>
