+1 (binding) Thanks Szehon
On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 10:18 AM Daniel Weeks <dwe...@apache.org> wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:41 AM Russell Spitzer <russell.spit...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> +1 (Bind) >> >> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 8:14 AM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <j...@nanthrax.net> >> wrote: >> >>> +1 (non binding) (as said in the PR :)) >>> >>> Thanks ! >>> >>> Regards >>> JB >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 3:00 PM Fokko Driesprong <fo...@apache.org> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Hi everyone, >>> > >>> > A while ago, I sent out a DISCUSS around simplifying the encoding of >>> the source-id(s) in the partition-spec and sort-order in the case of a >>> multi-argument transform. In short, use source-id in the case of a single >>> argument transform, and use source-ids in the case of multi-argument >>> transforms. We've had some good discussions on the PR (thanks for jumping >>> in, everyone!), and I feel there is consensus. Therefore, I would like to >>> raise this vote to verify this across the mailing list. This vote will >>> remain open for at least 72 hours. >>> > >>> > Please consider this my +1 >>> > >>> > Kind regards, >>> > Fokko >>> >>
