Hi,
> I think BlazeDS donation happened in August?
But it's not in a repo yet.
Justin
Hi,
> Anything we can add to (or remove from) this list?
New user forums.
4500 odd installs in the last month.
What we need help with - currently mostly SDK bug fixes.
Wiki reorg.
Wiki work on how to install/build the sdk/what bugs to fine.
Thanks,
Justin
We need to talk process for a bit. Keeping the various Jenkins jobs in
good working order requires significant resources. I'm more than happy
to keep doing that, but if no-one is paying attention to the
information those jobs provide, what is the point?
The situation for the past month (!) is that
Hi,
From what I can see the tests are in error and the fixes ok, I've not had the
bandwidth to debug and fix. Debugging mustella tests isn't easy and sadly
generally no one wants to fix them.
Justin
Hi, in my personal opinion Repeaters support should be discontinued in
Falcon. It looks like an "intrusive" feature, don't know if it's worth the
effort to implement it, its mantainance costs and the related code
complexity growth (energy that could be put somewhere else).
And, old projects still
...and its great to see a thread with this title, good job! :)
2013/9/4 Cosma Colanicchia
> Hi, in my personal opinion Repeaters support should be discontinued in
> Falcon. It looks like an "intrusive" feature, don't know if it's worth the
> effort to implement it, its mantainance costs and the
On 04/09/2013 06:43, Avi Kessner wrote:
Not every project is large. Some projects don't even require dynamic
data.
No, but even the smallest Flex projects I worked on broke the design
view in Builder because we used CSS and/or a custom component.
Tom
Yeah! Congratulations for reach this important milestone! :)
2013/9/4 Cosma Colanicchia
> ...and its great to see a thread with this title, good job! :)
>
>
> 2013/9/4 Cosma Colanicchia
>
> > Hi, in my personal opinion Repeaters support should be discontinued in
> > Falcon. It looks like an "i
On 04/09/2013 00:32, Carlos Rovira wrote:
to say that Repeaters are everywhere. So I'm afraid that Falcon will need
that things to make it production ready.
But all new builds would I hope be using a List with an item renderer
instead...
Tom
So, what do you suggest? Should we just use Mustella for legacy tests,
and use something different going forward?
IMHO it is not wise to add features or fix bugs without a test case,
even if the fixes "look ok".
We cannot leave its as is, because getting 6 emails a day that
Mustella has failed wi
>
> IMO, a pain point in Flex was that styles had to be specified on the
> component when the style implementation was actually in the skin/theme.
> The skinning model is different in FlexJS anyway so I think that gives us
> license to change the styling model as well. If you ever set a style on a
I think the design view does have its place. True I moved on to projects
where the design view was never used but there were times it was
indispensable for rapid prototyping
aYo
www.ayobinitie.com
mrbinitie.blogspot.com
hello
air flex are a developer writing to the community, and recently my interest
on apache has given new life to the framework.
I have an issue to bring to your attention.
I'm currently using the 10.4 sdk for developing desktop and mobile
applications 4.
The question specifically relates to URLF
On 9/4/2013 3:31 PM, aYo ~ wrote:
I think the design view does have its place. True I moved on to projects
where the design view was never used but there were times it was
indispensable for rapid prototyping
it has its uses for initial layouts, small tweaks, etc. i, for one, miss it.
and flex
Hi,
> So, what do you suggest?
1. Have more contributors/committers that have more time to fix and test bugs?
2. Nicely ask the full time Adobe people to put a bit more resources onto this
as they know and understand it best?
3. Having a way to be easily able debug mustella tests in the debugger
Darrell,
Excellent, that did the trick. Now I can start playing with it, and
maybe even contribute something useful ;-)
EdB
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Darrell Loverin wrote:
> The below args almost work for me from eclipse. There are three undefined
> classes because "flash.filters.*" i
Hi,
Is it me again, or will any AIR project (even an empty one) not
compile with Falcon?
Just in case it isn't me, I've filed an issue in JIRA [1].
EdB
1: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33704
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.i
Hi, if I remember well, hiding the actual absolute path selected by the
user to the application is one of the goals of the URLFilePremise (for
security reasons)..
2013/9/4 antonio esposito
> hello
> air flex are a developer writing to the community, and recently my interest
> on apache has give
Thanks. That's what I figured.
Unfortunately I will not be able to move completely over to JSON for
everything. (XML document editing capabilities is pretty important for what I
do.)
When I'm forced to start moving over to JS (probably the beginning of 2014),
I'll look into this in more detail
Should we develop an Air app that can make doing minor testing Mustella easier.
Like being able to click on a specific test and have that run? While having
it be able to do one component and identify the failing tests or maybe just run
each item in the component test on its own so we can track
Thank you Cosma,
in practice it is not possible to know the absolute path of the file.
2013/9/4 Cosma Colanicchia
> Hi, if I remember well, hiding the actual absolute path selected by the
> user to the application is one of the goals of the URLFilePremise (for
> security reasons)..
>
>
> 2013/
I'm rolling out spark drag and drop into our application and noticed that
the DragProxy doesn't assign a column to the instantiated itemRenderer.
I've made a ticket including an example application and a patch
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33705
I think design view is a nice feature for the starting developers. For those
who know what there doing design view is not needed.
A design view would be a nice step 1 and for those hello worlds, but really
learning all the code is much better and efficient.
Before FB 4.7 was released I used the
@Om, would you be ok to work on implementing the graphic part ?
I already did a mockup [1] and can give you karma to change it.
I've still got 3 main phases to implement on my side:
- Maven detection
- Process user choice
- Error detection
-Fred
[1] https://moqups.com/DoubleFx/X9DUamMP/
An option could be to add a checkbox labeled "I am an Apache Flex SDK
developer" above the SDKs combobox and show the "Nightly build" option if
selected but please don't change the version pattern or whatever, I'm
already annoyed because the build number is no more set to 0 on the dev
branch.
It w
Sounds like a very cool idea to me too, before we received a newsletter from
Spoon every months, do you think it is whished and possible this monthly
blog post content be sent to members of either users, devs, spoon members or
users registered to receive it?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De :
Hi Om,
Is there a way to get back the working model too? There used to be a
working example for users to quickly see it just below the code snippet.
Right now it doesn't seem to be working for any of the flex examples. It
says, page not found.
Screenshot: http://snag.gy/QWp2N.jpg
I reckon its jus
Did you add the configname option. See the amxmlc script.
Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.
Erik de Bruin wrote:
Hi,
Is it me again, or will any AIR project (even an empty one) not
compile with Falcon?
Just in case it isn't me, I've filed an issue in JIRA [1].
EdB
Sounds like a conversation from 15 years ago about code completion in ides
On 4 Sep 2013 13:21, "Swen van Zanten" wrote:
> I think design view is a nice feature for the starting developers. For
> those who know what there doing design view is not needed.
> A design view would be a nice step 1 and
Why does it need maven 3.4? Currently intellij doesn't work nicely with
flex and maven greater than 3.05 and flashbuilder doesn't work well with
maven at all :-)
On 4 Sep 2013 14:16, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
> @Om, would you be ok to work on implementing the graphic part ?
>
> I already did a mo
Thanks for telling me, that's a typo, it need Maven 3.0.4 :-)
-Message d'origine-
De : Avi Kessner [mailto:akess...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 15:28
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Add Mavenizer functionality to Installer
Why does it need maven 3.4? Currently intel
Fixed "Needs Maven >= 3.0.4 in the system paths.", btw, this is not intended
run on any IDE, so, no worries :-)
Thanks,
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Avi Kessner [mailto:akess...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 15:28
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : RE: Add Mavenizer functi
Thanks for your prompt reply Alex, I will add JIRA items for defects
I did a little bit for deep digging into the CSS file generated & can see that
it would barely work.
I have a certain itch to make the sample application look beautiful so I will
try to make it work with the consensus from grou
Just a random comment for the IE8 issue.
We have IE8 here on our enterprise network. IE9 is approved already, but who
knows when they will actually setup a package for it and push it (they are
really slow about it, sometimes years). I would rather keeping using standard
flex web-apps than use
That's a bit harsh. I used design view all the time to do basic layout
before I did any coding. You could quickly prototype your app and get
things laid out correctly before you hooked it up and "broke design view."
Nothing frustrated me more than having to recompile my app every time I
have to
Hi,
Just turn back from twitter where Ive seen a tweet mentioning The Apache
Flex installer is really cool; but it is taking forever to download Apache
Flex SDK.
And thats true, it takes ages, worse than that, if you do another SDK
installation, it takes the same time.
I never playe
On 9/4/13 1:48 AM, "Justin Mclean" wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> So, what do you suggest?
>1. Have more contributors/committers that have more time to fix and test
>bugs?
>2. Nicely ask the full time Adobe people to put a bit more resources onto
>this as they know and understand it best?
I'm willing to spen
In my experience the download is pretty fast... It's the MD5 check
that's taking a long time. Can you check which step is taking the
longest?
EdB
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:16 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Just turn back from twitter where I’ve seen a tweet mentioning “The Apache
> Fl
Well the only way to get more love to Mustella is to make it easier to use /
understand. A large part of that is taking it out of the command line and into
a GUI. The heavy performance hits while it's running is a separate issue, but
could be import too. Anyway to add a minor delay(0) or (1)
> I'd be happy to help contribute posting again
Woud be great !
-Message d'origine-
De : Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 16:32
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [BLOG] Monthy blog post schedule - September 2013
I know people loved the
The install log doesn't give any info about the time, is there any other way
?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 17:26
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [Intaller] Speed up download
In my experience the download
While the "install" is happening, the progress bar tells you which
action is currently being executed.
EdB
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:33 PM, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> The install log doesn't give any info about the time, is there any other way
> ?
>
> -Fred
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De :
On 9/4/13 7:52 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote:
>Well the only way to get more love to Mustella is to make it easier to
>use / understand. A large part of that is taking it out of the command
>line and into a GUI. The heavy performance hits while it's running is a
>separate issue, but could be
We could change the build number back to 0 and only set the build number
in the release branches.
On 9/4/13 5:01 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>An option could be to add a checkbox labeled "I am an Apache Flex SDK
>developer" above the SDKs combobox and show the "Nightly build" option if
>selecte
2013/9/4 Nicholas Kwiatkowski
> That's a bit harsh. I used design view all the time to do basic layout
> before I did any coding. You could quickly prototype your app and get
> things laid out correctly before you hooked it up and "broke design view."
> Nothing frustrated me more than having t
2013/9/4 Alex Harui
> Maybe we'll have an 'customStyles' object for styles that aren't in CSS
+1 (I would prefer simply "styles" as for the name)
Ok I've got approximated numbers:
Sdk download: 10mn
sdk md5: 2 mn
air download: 12 mn
and the rest: about 3mn
Weird the Flex SDK has been faster to download then the AIR one, maybe it
has been cached somewhere as I downloaded it before.
I guess we can divide this almost 30mn by 2 using multi
Haha, I got it, I need to be sited in from of the installer with my chrono
#ILoveComputers.
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 17:43
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [Intaller] Speed up download
While the "insta
Should we allow people to pick a mirror closer to their geographical area?
-Mark
-Original Message-
From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of OmPrakash
Muppirala
Sent: Wednesday, September 04, 2013 12:10 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Intaller] Speed up
Is the test for [1] misspelled? "Sesision" vs "Session"?
[1] gumbo/components/DataGrid/Properties/DataGrid_Properties_editable
Editable_startItemEditorSesision_inValidParams Failed Timed out
-Original Message-
From: flex.muste...@gmail.com [mailto:flex.muste...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednes
On 9/4/13 9:04 AM, "Cosma Colanicchia" wrote:
>2013/9/4 Alex Harui
>
>> Maybe we'll have an 'customStyles' object for styles that aren't in CSS
>
>
>+1 (I would prefer simply "styles" as for the name)
Maybe, but then folks might stuff all of their styles in there. Which
would work, but maybe
I know people loved the Spoon updates -- the problem is that it came down
to just me writing them -- and depending on others to push it out (who
sometimes were busy enough to require it to wait weeks). I ended up just
getting frustrated and stopped. I'd be happy to help contribute posting
again.
Code-completion is a strong argument, but it can be done in the styles
object as well, although FB doesn't know how to do that today.
Maybe we'll have an 'customStyles' object for styles that aren't in CSS
spec.
-Alex
On 9/4/13 7:14 AM, "Sharma, Pratyoosh"
wrote:
>Thanks for your prompt reply
The other benefit except it would make the maven converter working for
snapshots, would be that the flex-sdk-description.xml which is not git
ignored today would not hassles any more at commit time after a build.
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercr
It takes a long time for me. I'm on 1.5Mb DSL. The internet isn't fast
for everyone.
We are soon to be only the embedded font libraries away from not needing
the Adobe SDK download.
But I'm seriously considering trying to find out what it would take to
start a "company" that could be an Adobe d
@Nick, exactly the same for me.
@Eric, you can check
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=30749573 to
find what exists today as a "replacement".
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013
I didn't have a look at how it was done and I would rather prefer a Justin
agreement and eventually help than spending time for nothing.
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 18:16
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: Nighly builds
Hi Darrell,
Is that what you want to take on next? Or maybe pick off a few of the
bugs already filed under Falcon that Cyrill scrubbed last night?
Thanks,
-Alex
On 9/4/13 8:59 AM, "Darrell Loverin" wrote:
>I agree that an environment variable is a good way to break the flex sdk
>and compiler
You are a committer so you can make those changes and see if anyone vetoes
it. I won't.
On 9/4/13 9:11 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>The other benefit except it would make the maven converter working for
>snapshots, would be that the flex-sdk-description.xml which is not git
>ignored today woul
What means the "old" way ?
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 18:21
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [Intaller] Speed up download
It takes a long time for me. I'm on 1.5Mb DSL. The internet isn't fast for
everyone.
We ar
On 9/4/13 9:17 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" wrote:
>Is the test for [1] misspelled? "Sesision" vs "Session"?
There are lots of spelling mistakes in test names, but shouldn't affect
the test itself.
-Alex
On 9/4/13 9:23 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" wrote:
>What means the "old" way ?
With an AIR SDK packaged in so you don't need separate downloads unless
you don't like the default AIR SDK.
-Alex
I agree that an environment variable is a good way to break the flex sdk
and compiler location dependencies. I'd suggest something like
FLEX_COMPILER_HOME rather than a codename like "FALCON".
It would be pretty quick to see if this would work:
1. Command line - flex scripts defer to an alternate
Wouldn't this (start a "company") allowed us to distribute the other
artifacts we missed to create a maven repo ?
-Fred
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 18:26
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [Intaller] Speed up download
Maybe we could follow W3C rules, if any, in this case. Its the "custom"
prefix that feels just too broad to me, and could lead to confusion..
2013/9/4 Alex Harui
>
>
> On 9/4/13 9:04 AM, "Cosma Colanicchia" wrote:
>
> >2013/9/4 Alex Harui
> >
> >> Maybe we'll have an 'customStyles' object for
On Sep 4, 2013 2:55 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J"
wrote:
>
> Should we develop an Air app that can make doing minor testing Mustella
easier. Like being able to click on a specific test and have that run?
While having it be able to do one component and identify the failing tests
or maybe just run each
On 9/4/2013 11:25 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
In my experience the download is pretty fast... It's the MD5 check
that's taking a long time. Can you check which step is taking the
longest?
I'm the one who said that. I wasn't timing stuff. It took, roughly,
an hour to download the SDK.
The MD5
On Sep 4, 2013 9:05 AM, "Jeffry Houser" wrote:
>
> On 9/4/2013 11:25 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
>>
>> In my experience the download is pretty fast... It's the MD5 check
>> that's taking a long time. Can you check which step is taking the
>> longest?
>
>
> I'm the one who said that. I wasn't timing
> FLEX_COMPILER_HOME
I thought Alex wanted to start including Falcon as part of the SDK. If that's
the case, the Falcon JARs belong in the same lib directory as all the other
JARs, including those for the old compiler, and there wouldn't be different
"homes" for the two compilers. But there st
If I could choose, I'd have you look at those bugs Cyrill scrubbed. If
they involve ANTLR changes, you will have a better clue than me, even if
you haven't personally done that sort of thing yet, just because you've
heard the rest of your former team talk about it.
-Alex
On 9/4/13 9:39 AM, "Darr
I upgraded the VM, it now runs on 4 cores instead of 2 and has 7 GB of
memory. This shaved roughly an hour, hour and a half from the run
time. Not sure if my Azure account "free credits" will stretch to a
month with this config, if not, I'll go back to the 'old' config as
the improvement is not as
Thanks for trying. The compile should have distributed to the extra
cores, but the run phase doesn't. One reason is because the flashlog.txt
is captured so only one player instance should run at a time. In theory,
we don't need that any more since it was mainly used to catch uncaught
exceptions,
The artifacts are simple copies of the output files in the workspace.
If needed, we can add a copy and rename action to the 'release' job
and create artifacts that fit your needs...
EdB
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:01 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Justin Mclean w
> We are soon to be only the embedded font libraries away from not needing
> the Adobe SDK download.
>
We don't download the whole Adobe SDK. We get only the jars we need. I
doubt that shaving that download off would benefit us too much.
Thanks,
Om
On 9/4/13 10:14 AM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>> FLEX_COMPILER_HOME
>
>I thought Alex wanted to start including Falcon as part of the SDK.
Yes, true, but IMO, that includes getting Falcon to work from FB.
>If that's the case, the Falcon JARs belong in the same lib directory as
>all the other JARs,
OK, I'll assign a bug to myself.
On 9/4/13 12:47 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>If I could choose, I'd have you look at those bugs Cyrill scrubbed. If
>they involve ANTLR changes, you will have a better clue than me, even if
>you haven't personally done that sort of thing yet, just because you've
>he
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Thanks for trying. The compile should have distributed to the extra
> cores, but the run phase doesn't. One reason is because the flashlog.txt
> is captured so only one player instance should run at a time. In theory,
> we don't need that an
Good idea, you've got enough kudos to make it but it is not for a today
solution to our problems or it might ?
-Message d'origine-
De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 18:46
À : dev@flex.apache.org
Objet : Re: [Intaller] Speed up download
Yep. And
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Erik de Bruin wrote:
> The artifacts are simple copies of the output files in the workspace.
> If needed, we can add a copy and rename action to the 'release' job
> and create artifacts that fit your needs...
>
> EdB
>
Isn't the filename driven off of a propertie
> The current FB can't use Falcon
By making a new flex-compiler-oem.jar based on Falcon, you could make FB use
Falcon to compile. But I don't think you'd get memory-resident data structures,
which was one of the main points of Falcon... I think with the
flex-compiler-oem.jar approach you'd be s
Not today, but I might start the process soon. There are a number of
things that is difficult for Apache to do as a non-profit source-code
distributor.
First I have to find a suitable URL (most of the good ones are taken),
then get approval from Apache Trademarks, then get approval from Adobe
Leg
Well there has to be an order of override:
If there is a conflict the inline declared style property wins over something
buried inside a style attribute, but I am not a code usability expert :)
Also I am hopeful that tooling would mature eventually but I would avoid
counting on it if I can.
You
On 9/4/13 10:20 AM, "Gordon Smith" wrote:
>> The current FB can't use Falcon
>
>By making a new flex-compiler-oem.jar based on Falcon, you could make FB
>use Falcon to compile. But I don't think you'd get memory-resident data
>structures, which was one of the main points of Falcon... I think wi
Sorry for delay,
I've added some content on the IntelliJ IDEA page [1] and I have plans
to add more useful info there. Feel free to edit the page and fix
spelling or other mistakes there.
I remember my promise to publish a blog post promoting Apache Flex SDK
at JetBrains site. I confirm that I'
I think it would be awesome if we can use Falcon in FB. It would help
enormously with getting more people involved in testing and debugging,
as well as create a sense of progress for the larger community. So, my
vote would be on "flex-compiler-oem.jar".
EdB
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Alex
It would be a separate compile as you noted but what other choice is there
if we don't have access to the FB sources?
>>You definitely wouldn't get Falcon-based code hinting, and the data
>>structures of the old Code Model would be taking up memory.
Not sure why we wouldn't get Falcon-based code
I wasn't really trying to start a discussion on the merits or use of DV,
but I don't mind.
I've heard this sentiment before and we'll just have to agree to
disagree. I've been a Flex dev since just before version 3, so I hope
I'm worth SOME salt. Everyone that I have worked with, although les
> It would be a separate compile as you noted but what other choice is there if
> we don't have access to the FB sources?
I don't see another choice. I vote for abandoning FB and trying to get another
IDE to do proper Falcon integration.
> FB uses Falcon for code hinting today.
FB uses the pre
On 9/4/13 10:32 AM, "Darrell Loverin" wrote:
>It would be a separate compile as you noted but what other choice is there
>if we don't have access to the FB sources?
We could try to get more FB code donated, but then we'd also need a way to
modify existing FB installs. That's why I'm wondering
Can someone assign this bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33322
to "Darrell Loverin"
Doesn't seem like I have the ability to edit bugs.
-Darrell
On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> HI,
>
> > The tracking is based on the Flex version. We dont make a distinction
> > between the nightly vs. released sdk. We should probably bump up the
> > version number in our develop branch to start tracking the nightlies.
>
> Were is it
I don't know anything about Jenkins, but how would you get multiple
instances of FP writing to separate flashlog.txt files? Are you saying
there'd be different Vms with different logins/usernames?
-Alex
On 9/4/13 10:24 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Alex Har
I tried, but JIRA doesn't know about a "Darrell Loverin". Do you have
a JIRA account?
EdB
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Darrell Loverin wrote:
> Can someone assign this bug https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLEX-33322
> to "Darrell Loverin"
>
> Doesn't seem like I have the ability to e
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:32 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
> I don't know anything about Jenkins, but how would you get multiple
> instances of FP writing to separate flashlog.txt files? Are you saying
> there'd be different Vms with different logins/usernames?
>
>
Yes, that is correct. Right now there
Which is more important to get done first? The script changes will be
simple but writing a replacement flex-compiler-oem.jar may become involved
and take a week.
-Darrell
On 9/4/13 12:08 PM, "Alex Harui" wrote:
>Hi Darrell,
>
>Is that what you want to take on next? Or maybe pick off a few o
Ok, I found a code that gives a rough idea on how to do multi part downloads
[1], I guess the size needs to be queried first, anyone wants to give a try
with the SDK in order to integrate it in the installer ?
-Fred
[1]
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2044649/pause-and-resume-download-in-flex
Might we be able to get someone on the Flash Builder team (if there is
such a thing) to join this conversation and maybe shed some light on
some of these issues?
EdB
On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
>
> On 9/4/13 10:32 AM, "Darrell Loverin" wrote:
>
>>It would be a separate
Yep. And host writeable databases for a better showcase.
But I'm really thinking more "me" than "us". It would be my personal
business. For-Profit, not a foundation or consortium. There are
for-profit businesses around Apache Subversion, for example. And if I
could figure out how to make enou
I've been able to create bugs.
On 9/4/13 1:39 PM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>I tried, but JIRA doesn't know about a "Darrell Loverin". Do you have
>a JIRA account?
>
>EdB
>
>
>
>On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 7:36 PM, Darrell Loverin
>wrote:
>> Can someone assign this bug
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira
On 9/4/13 10:43 AM, "Erik de Bruin" wrote:
>Might we be able to get someone on the Flash Builder team (if there is
>such a thing) to join this conversation and maybe shed some light on
>some of these issues?
I believe the original authors are no longer at Adobe.
It is interesting that folks us
1 - 100 of 170 matches
Mail list logo
