Maybe we could follow W3C rules, if any, in this case. Its the "custom" prefix that feels just too broad to me, and could lead to confusion..
2013/9/4 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > > > On 9/4/13 9:04 AM, "Cosma Colanicchia" <cosma...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >2013/9/4 Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> > > > >> Maybe we'll have an 'customStyles' object for styles that aren't in CSS > > > > > >+1 (I would prefer simply "styles" as for the name) > Maybe, but then folks might stuff all of their styles in there. Which > would work, but maybe we shouldn't invite them to do that? What wins if > you do: > <foo style="color:red" color="red" /> > > -Alex > >
