The other benefit except it would make the maven converter working for snapshots, would be that the flex-sdk-description.xml which is not git ignored today would not hassles any more at commit time after a build.
-----Message d'origine----- De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mercredi 4 septembre 2013 18:02 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Nighly builds and releases We could change the build number back to 0 and only set the build number in the release branches. On 9/4/13 5:01 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >An option could be to add a checkbox labeled "I am an Apache Flex SDK >developer" above the SDKs combobox and show the "Nightly build" option >if selected but please don't change the version pattern or whatever, >I'm already annoyed because the build number is no more set to 0 on the >dev branch. > >It won't be a problem with the installer as we know the user choose >"Nightly build" but it is one when out of the installer, when one >prepares the dev branch to work on an IDE and wants to run the maven >converter on it. >Before the converter was able to create a SNAPSHOT version based on the >build number set to "0", today is not, it creates a release instead >which is not convenient. >One have to remember another step replacing the build number to "0" >before >running it, it seems nothing but it is a waste of time when forgotten >and indeed it is not documented. > >Happily with the installer maven feature, there will be a way to make a >SNAPSHOT based on the user choice. > >-Fred > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] Envoyé : mercredi >4 septembre 2013 02:54 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Nighly >builds and releases > >HI, > >> The tracking is based on the Flex version. We dont make a >> distinction between the nightly vs. released sdk. We should probably >> bump up the version number in our develop branch to start tracking the nightlies. > >Were is it pickup up the version from? The develop branch should have >all versions at 4.11. > >Thanks, >Justin
