So, what do you suggest? Should we just use Mustella for legacy tests, and use something different going forward?
IMHO it is not wise to add features or fix bugs without a test case, even if the fixes "look ok". We cannot leave its as is, because getting 6 emails a day that Mustella has failed will cause people not to pay attention to them anymore and the framework and/or test suite will continue to degrade :-( EdB On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 9:57 AM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > Hi, > > From what I can see the tests are in error and the fixes ok, I've not had the > bandwidth to debug and fix. Debugging mustella tests isn't easy and sadly > generally no one wants to fix them. > > Justin -- Ix Multimedia Software Jan Luykenstraat 27 3521 VB Utrecht T. 06-51952295 I. www.ixsoftware.nl
