No, but I didn't ask. I can ask in IRC tonight and see what their opinion
is on it.
-Nick
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Alex Harui wrote:
> Sorry, when I said SVN, I meant under a different folder than CMS currently
> watches, like a sibling of asjs, falcon, etc. SVN knows how to serve tho
Sorry, when I said SVN, I meant under a different folder than CMS currently
watches, like a sibling of asjs, falcon, etc. SVN knows how to serve those
files. Did Infra explicitly say we can't explode it on dist? That's
another server we have write access to.
On 1/14/13 10:02 AM, "Nicholas Kwia
When I say "CMS", I am pretty much talking about our SVN as the repository.
The CMS (buildbot) copies content from the SVN to its directories. While
it is coping, it checks each file for matches to the path strings we give
and if they match, it does magic to it.
I guess we could put it on people
What do you really mean by "on our website"? Couldn't we point to a copy on
people@a.o or even in our SVN?
On 1/14/13 5:08 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" wrote:
> Unfortunately, the only way to get stuff to our website is through the CMS.
> Infra hasn't given us any other options, and from a lega
Quoting Alex Harui :
On 1/14/13 6:18 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
On a side note;
I cannot imagine how long it would take to update the CMS with the
FlashPlayer API in there as well.
We do not have a license to copy the Flash and other Adobe ASDocs to Apache.
Someday, our ASDoc's shou
On 1/14/13 6:18 AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
> On a side note;
>
> I cannot imagine how long it would take to update the CMS with the
> FlashPlayer API in there as well.
>
We do not have a license to copy the Flash and other Adobe ASDocs to Apache.
Someday, our ASDoc's should point to the A
On 1/14/13 9 :02AM, "Michael Schmalle" wrote:
>Actually, I have to check into this but if adobe has publicly
>available SWCs that the new asdoc generator could load and parse the
>DITA with their documentation, adding Flash Player documentation is
>possible.
I'm pretty sure you don't have acce
gt;>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -Original Message-
>>>>> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
>>>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
>>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>>&
apache.org/v2/asdoc>ASDOCs
>> atm. It has less clutter than the adobe ones and load faster.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
>
ssage-
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and
therefore, we have
to have it in the SVN). Otherwise I have to download 8 copie
the https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc ASDOCs atm. It has less
>>> clutter than the adobe ones and load faster.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
>>> Sent: Monday, Janu
It would be nice.
-Original Message-
From: Michael Schmalle [mailto:apa...@teotigraphix.com]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:03 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
Actually, I have to check into this but if adobe has publicly available SWCs
that the new
n the adobe ones and load faster.
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, we h
Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, we have
to have it in the SVN). Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for my 8
different mach
;
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
>
> Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore,
Unfortunately, the only way to get stuff to our website is through the CMS.
Infra hasn't given us any other options, and from a legal standpoint, I
would rather keep them on our domain.
-Nick
On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Michael Schmalle
wrote:
> I wasn't debating the fact that asdocs need
I like the https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc ASDOCs atm. It has less clutter
than the adobe ones and load faster.
-Original Message-
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
I wasn't debating the fact that asdocs need to be public, I was
questioning if having them in the CMS is our only option.
As you said, republishing them kills the build and that proves there
must be some other option or hosting solution.
Mike
Quoting Nicholas Kwiatkowski :
Personally, I
Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, we have
to have it in the SVN). Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for my 8
different machines. I asked infra on IRC to see about the possibility to
get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't run through the CMS or something
to
19 matches
Mail list logo
