No, but I didn't ask.  I can ask in IRC tonight and see what their opinion
is on it.

-Nick

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:

> Sorry, when I said SVN, I meant under a different folder than CMS currently
> watches, like a sibling of asjs, falcon, etc.  SVN knows how to serve those
> files.  Did Infra explicitly say we can't explode it on dist?  That's
> another server we have write access to.
>
>
> On 1/14/13 10:02 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <nicho...@spoon.as> wrote:
>
> > When I say "CMS", I am pretty much talking about our SVN as the
> repository.
> >  The CMS (buildbot) copies content from the SVN to its directories.
>  While
> > it is coping, it checks each file for matches to the path strings we give
> > and if they match, it does magic to it.
> >
> > I guess we could put it on people, but I doubt that is kosher for
> something
> > that is for the project...
> >
> > -Nick
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >
> >> What do you really mean by "on our website"?  Couldn't we point to a
> copy
> >> on
> >> people@a.o or even in our SVN?
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/14/13 5:08 AM, "Nicholas Kwiatkowski" <nicho...@spoon.as> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Unfortunately, the only way to get stuff to our website is through the
> >> CMS.
> >>>  Infra hasn't given us any other options, and from a legal standpoint,
> I
> >>> would rather keep them on our domain.
> >>>
> >>> -Nick
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Michael Schmalle
> >>> <apa...@teotigraphix.com>wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> I wasn't debating the fact that asdocs need to be public, I was
> >>>> questioning if having them in the CMS is our only option.
> >>>>
> >>>> As you said, republishing them kills the build and that proves there
> >> must
> >>>> be some other option or hosting solution.
> >>>>
> >>>> Mike
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Quoting Nicholas Kwiatkowski <nicho...@spoon.as>:
> >>>>
> >>>>  Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore,
> we
> >>>>> have
> >>>>> to have it in the SVN).  Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for
> my 8
> >>>>> different machines.  I asked infra on IRC to see about the
> possibility
> >> to
> >>>>> get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't run through the CMS or
> >> something
> >>>>> to that effect, and they didn't like the idea..
> >>>>>
> >>>>> By the way, when anybody updates the ASdocs, the CMS will take about
> 2
> >>>>> hours to process it.  It also causes the buildbot process to crash ;S
> >>>>>
> >>>>> -Nick
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Michael Schmalle
> >>>>> <apa...@teotigraphix.com>**wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Having the asdoc in the site folder, is this a good idea?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> The seems really wrong on a gut level to me but I don't have another
> >>>>>> solution at the moment. I am sitting still waiting on a broadband
> >>>>>> connection just to change my site info. This is also why I only
> >>>>>> selectively
> >>>>>> check out whiteboard folders so I don't get multiple copied branches
> >> of
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>> 10000's of framework files and tests.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> In reply to the Flash docs, IMHO me a re screwed and another reason
> to
> >>>>>> keep running from Adobe. :) Since I have been working on a new ASDOc
> >>>>>> tool/program I can see using the SWCs API to create the entries and
> >> links
> >>>>>> in the docs but have links in them to the Adobe live docs.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> This way you would get the api right in fornt of you all the way up
> to
> >>>>>> Object but not the descriptions.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Mike
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
> >>>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
> >>>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
> >>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
> >>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alex Harui
> >> Flex SDK Team
> >> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> >> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
> >>
> >>
>
> --
> Alex Harui
> Flex SDK Team
> Adobe Systems, Inc.
> http://blogs.adobe.com/aharui
>
>

Reply via email to