It didn't seem to be the length of the files, rather the number of files. I have a a feeling that buildbot keeps an internal database of the files it needs to touch for certain updates. I ended up niceing the process to not break anything else on people.a.o
-Nick On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 9:18 AM, Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com>wrote: > On a side note; > > I cannot imagine how long it would take to update the CMS with the > FlashPlayer API in there as well. > > You have to understand the time would be exponential because not only are > you adding all the new files for the Flash API but you are also adding a > monumental amount of text into each Apache Flex asdoc page as well with the > inherited information. > > But, I also understand this data would only be updated on each new release > so I guess it really is a mute point in the end. > > Mike > > > > Quoting Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > > Neither am I, but it looks much better. >> >> On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote: >> >> I just updated the image, I'm definitely not a web designer. >>> >>> >>> Harbs >>>> >>>> On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote: >>>> >>>> I like the >>>> https://flex.apache.org/v2/**asdoc<https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc>ASDOCs >>>> atm. It has less clutter than the adobe ones and load faster. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as] >>>>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55 >>>>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>>>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs >>>>> >>>>> Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, we >>>>> have >>>>> to have it in the SVN). Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for my 8 >>>>> different machines. I asked infra on IRC to see about the possibility >>>>> to >>>>> get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't run through the CMS or >>>>> something >>>>> to that effect, and they didn't like the idea.. >>>>> >>>>> By the way, when anybody updates the ASdocs, the CMS will take about 2 >>>>> hours to process it. It also causes the buildbot process to crash ;S >>>>> >>>>> -Nick >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Michael Schmalle >>>>> <apa...@teotigraphix.com>**wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Having the asdoc in the site folder, is this a good idea? >>>>>> >>>>>> The seems really wrong on a gut level to me but I don't have another >>>>>> solution at the moment. I am sitting still waiting on a broadband >>>>>> connection just to change my site info. This is also why I only >>>>>> selectively >>>>>> check out whiteboard folders so I don't get multiple copied branches >>>>>> of the >>>>>> 10000's of framework files and tests. >>>>>> >>>>>> In reply to the Flash docs, IMHO me a re screwed and another reason to >>>>>> keep running from Adobe. :) Since I have been working on a new ASDOc >>>>>> tool/program I can see using the SWCs API to create the entries and >>>>>> links >>>>>> in the docs but have links in them to the Adobe live docs. >>>>>> >>>>>> This way you would get the api right in fornt of you all the way up to >>>>>> Object but not the descriptions. >>>>>> >>>>>> Mike >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC >>>>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com >>>>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> >> > -- > Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC > http://www.teotigraphix.com > http://blog.teotigraphix.com > >
