Michael, Can you update the source branch for ASdocs? This will fix future versions of the asdoc download we provide users as well...
-Nick On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 8:58 AM, Michael Schmalle <apa...@teotigraphix.com>wrote: > > Quoting Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>: > > Maybe, but there is the issue of the missing core classes (which I >> mentioned in the other thread I started). >> > > I answered this, the only way to get core classes is by creating a new > asdoc that parses and renders the API from SWCs which I know is possible, > this way you get the API. I see no real option of getting the descriptions > with those, only code generated links that point to the Adobe livedocs for > each member etc which would be really akward. > > > > I've also used the filter in the Adobe ASDocs based on Flash/AIR version >> on occasion. For the classes where it matters, those filters are useful. >> > > The current template for asdoc does not have all the JavaScript for > filtering. At the moment this is impossible. > > > If we're picking the ASDocs apart, I'd add a padding to the Apache Flex >> logo at the top right and probably make it a bit smaller? >> > > I just updated the image, I'm definitely not a web designer. > > > > Harbs >> >> On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote: >> >> I like the >> https://flex.apache.org/v2/**asdoc<https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc>ASDOCs >> atm. It has less clutter than the adobe ones and load faster. >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as] >>> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55 >>> To: dev@flex.apache.org >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs >>> >>> Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, we >>> have >>> to have it in the SVN). Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for my 8 >>> different machines. I asked infra on IRC to see about the possibility to >>> get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't run through the CMS or >>> something >>> to that effect, and they didn't like the idea.. >>> >>> By the way, when anybody updates the ASdocs, the CMS will take about 2 >>> hours to process it. It also causes the buildbot process to crash ;S >>> >>> -Nick >>> >>> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Michael Schmalle >>> <apa...@teotigraphix.com>**wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Having the asdoc in the site folder, is this a good idea? >>>> >>>> The seems really wrong on a gut level to me but I don't have another >>>> solution at the moment. I am sitting still waiting on a broadband >>>> connection just to change my site info. This is also why I only >>>> selectively >>>> check out whiteboard folders so I don't get multiple copied branches of >>>> the >>>> 10000's of framework files and tests. >>>> >>>> In reply to the Flash docs, IMHO me a re screwed and another reason to >>>> keep running from Adobe. :) Since I have been working on a new ASDOc >>>> tool/program I can see using the SWCs API to create the entries and >>>> links >>>> in the docs but have links in them to the Adobe live docs. >>>> >>>> This way you would get the api right in fornt of you all the way up to >>>> Object but not the descriptions. >>>> >>>> Mike >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC >>>> http://www.teotigraphix.com >>>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> > -- > Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC > http://www.teotigraphix.com > http://blog.teotigraphix.com > >
