On a side note;

I cannot imagine how long it would take to update the CMS with the FlashPlayer API in there as well.

You have to understand the time would be exponential because not only are you adding all the new files for the Flash API but you are also adding a monumental amount of text into each Apache Flex asdoc page as well with the inherited information.

But, I also understand this data would only be updated on each new release so I guess it really is a mute point in the end.

Mike


Quoting Harbs <harbs.li...@gmail.com>:

Neither am I, but it looks much better.

On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:58 PM, Michael Schmalle wrote:

I just updated the image, I'm definitely not a web designer.


Harbs

On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:

I like the https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc ASDOCs atm. It has less clutter than the adobe ones and load faster.



-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs

Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, we have
to have it in the SVN).  Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for my 8
different machines.  I asked infra on IRC to see about the possibility to
get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't run through the CMS or something
to that effect, and they didn't like the idea..

By the way, when anybody updates the ASdocs, the CMS will take about 2
hours to process it.  It also causes the buildbot process to crash ;S

-Nick

On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Michael Schmalle
<apa...@teotigraphix.com>wrote:


Having the asdoc in the site folder, is this a good idea?

The seems really wrong on a gut level to me but I don't have another
solution at the moment. I am sitting still waiting on a broadband
connection just to change my site info. This is also why I only selectively check out whiteboard folders so I don't get multiple copied branches of the
10000's of framework files and tests.

In reply to the Flash docs, IMHO me a re screwed and another reason to
keep running from Adobe. :) Since I have been working on a new ASDOc
tool/program I can see using the SWCs API to create the entries and links
in the docs but have links in them to the Adobe live docs.

This way you would get the api right in fornt of you all the way up to
Object but not the descriptions.

Mike

--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com








--
Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
http://www.teotigraphix.com
http://blog.teotigraphix.com

Reply via email to