Maybe, but there is the issue of the missing core classes (which I mentioned in 
the other thread I started).

I've also used the filter in the Adobe ASDocs based on Flash/AIR version on 
occasion. For the classes where it matters, those filters are useful.

If we're picking the ASDocs apart, I'd add a padding to the Apache Flex logo at 
the top right and probably make it a bit smaller…

Harbs

On Jan 14, 2013, at 3:03 PM, Kessler CTR Mark J wrote:

> I like the https://flex.apache.org/v2/asdoc ASDOCs atm.  It has less clutter 
> than the adobe ones and load faster.
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nicholas Kwiatkowski [mailto:nicho...@spoon.as] 
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 7:55
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] website asdocs
> 
> Personally, I like having the ASDocs on the website (and therefore, we have
> to have it in the SVN).  Otherwise I have to download 8 copies for my 8
> different machines.  I asked infra on IRC to see about the possibility to
> get a "help.flex.apache.org" that wasn't run through the CMS or something
> to that effect, and they didn't like the idea..
> 
> By the way, when anybody updates the ASdocs, the CMS will take about 2
> hours to process it.  It also causes the buildbot process to crash ;S
> 
> -Nick
> 
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 5:12 AM, Michael Schmalle
> <apa...@teotigraphix.com>wrote:
> 
>> 
>> Having the asdoc in the site folder, is this a good idea?
>> 
>> The seems really wrong on a gut level to me but I don't have another
>> solution at the moment. I am sitting still waiting on a broadband
>> connection just to change my site info. This is also why I only selectively
>> check out whiteboard folders so I don't get multiple copied branches of the
>> 10000's of framework files and tests.
>> 
>> In reply to the Flash docs, IMHO me a re screwed and another reason to
>> keep running from Adobe. :) Since I have been working on a new ASDOc
>> tool/program I can see using the SWCs API to create the entries and links
>> in the docs but have links in them to the Adobe live docs.
>> 
>> This way you would get the api right in fornt of you all the way up to
>> Object but not the descriptions.
>> 
>> Mike
>> 
>> --
>> Michael Schmalle - Teoti Graphix, LLC
>> http://www.teotigraphix.com
>> http://blog.teotigraphix.com
>> 
>> 

Reply via email to